The sentinel stent? A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteric stenting prior to colorectal resections.
Colorectal
Iatrogenic injury
Resection
Stent
Ureter
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
accepted:
02
05
2019
pubmed:
9
6
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
9
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
'Prophylactic' ureteric stents potentially reduce rates, and facilitate intraoperative recognition, of iatrogenic ureteric injury (IUI) during colorectal resections. A lack of consensus surrounds the risk-benefit equation of this practice, and we aimed to assess the evidence base. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched using terms 'ureteric/ureteral/JJ/Double J stent' or 'ureteric/ureteral catheter' and 'colorectal/prophylactic/resection/diverticular disease/diverticulitis/iatrogenic injury'. Primary outcomes were rates of ureteric injuries and their intraoperative identification. Secondary outcomes included stent complication rates. We identified 987 publications; 22 papers met the inclusion criteria. No randomised controlled trials were found. The total number of patients pooled for evaluation was 869,603 (102,370 with ureteric stents/catheters, 767,233 controls). The most frequent indications for prophylactic stents were diverticular disease (45.38%), neoplasia (33.45%) and inflammatory bowel disease (9.37%). Pooled results saw IUI in 1521/102,370 (1.49%) with, and in 1333/767,233 (0.17%) without, prophylactic ureteric stents. Intraoperative recognition of IUIs occurred in 10/16 injuries (62.5%) with prophylactic stents, versus 9/17 (52.94%) without stents (p = 0.579). The most serious complications of prophylactic stent use were ureteric injury (2/1716, 0.12%) and transient ureteric obstruction following stent removal (13/666, 1.95%). Placement of prophylactic ureteric stents has a low complication rate. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that stents decrease ureteric injury or increase intraoperative detection of IUIs. Apparently higher rates of IUI in stented patients likely reflect use in higher risk resections. A prospective registry with harmonised data collection points and stratification of intraoperative risk is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31175421
doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03314-1
pii: 10.1007/s00384-019-03314-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1161-1178Références
JSLS. 2002 Jan-Mar;6(1):49-52
pubmed: 12002296
J Korean Med Sci. 2002 Oct;17(5):633-5
pubmed: 12378014
Dis Colon Rectum. 1959 Jul-Aug;2(4):340-9
pubmed: 13672087
BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):277-89
pubmed: 15291852
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jun;22(6):683-7
pubmed: 17031654
Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Mar;12(1):45-50
pubmed: 18512012
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(5):422-7
pubmed: 18609278
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):79-85
pubmed: 20013934
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010 Jun;23(2):104-12
pubmed: 21629628
World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):2143-8
pubmed: 21732208
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):267-71
pubmed: 22430909
Med J Malaysia. 2012 Apr;67(2):169-72
pubmed: 22822637
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Feb;10(2):108-15
pubmed: 23318355
Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Jun;33(6):508-10
pubmed: 2351005
Colorectal Dis. 1999 Nov;1(6):334-7
pubmed: 23574597
Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):87-9
pubmed: 23820682
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jan;57(1):91-7
pubmed: 24316951
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Feb;57(2):179-86
pubmed: 24401879
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):284-94
pubmed: 24509449
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):98-103
pubmed: 24656474
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2730-3
pubmed: 24737531
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1406-12
pubmed: 25154890
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):930-6
pubmed: 25578621
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(5):799-806
pubmed: 25796218
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul;26(7):935-942.e1
pubmed: 25840836
Am J Surg. 2016 Jan;211(1):31-9
pubmed: 26298687
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Dec;25(12):966-70
pubmed: 26583763
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):521-530
pubmed: 26602784
Arab J Urol. 2015 Dec;13(4):250-7
pubmed: 26609443
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):e1-2
pubmed: 26672509
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Jun;29(2):145-51
pubmed: 27247540
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):870-875
pubmed: 27575463
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Feb;5(3):44
pubmed: 28251123
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):87-90
pubmed: 28973647
J Surg Res. 2018 Feb;222:203-211.e3
pubmed: 29100586
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jan;61(1):84-88
pubmed: 29215477
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3342-3348
pubmed: 29340810
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Mar;59(2):119-125
pubmed: 29520388
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Jun 1;32:119-124
pubmed: 29791695
J Surg Res. 2019 Feb;234:161-166
pubmed: 30527469
Dis Colon Rectum. 1982 Jul-Aug;25(5):457-60
pubmed: 7094783
J Urol. 1980 Feb;123(2):265-6
pubmed: 7354536
J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec;4(6):399-403
pubmed: 7881143
Am Surg. 1994 Mar;60(3):212-6
pubmed: 8116985
Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Apr;37(4):330-4
pubmed: 8168411
J Urol. 1996 Mar;155(3):878-81
pubmed: 8583597
Tech Urol. 1997 Winter;3(4):213-5
pubmed: 9531105
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jun;52(6):377-84
pubmed: 9764259