Child safeguarding practices in light of the Deserving/Undeserving paradigm: A historical & contemporary analysis.
Adolescent
Attitude to Health
Child
Child Protective Services
/ history
Child Welfare
/ history
Child, Preschool
Delivery of Health Care
/ history
Family
Female
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Male
Mental Health
Parents
/ psychology
Social Work
/ history
United Kingdom
Child protection
Deservedness
Safeguarding
Journal
Child abuse & neglect
ISSN: 1873-7757
Titre abrégé: Child Abuse Negl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7801702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
13
10
2018
revised:
15
04
2019
accepted:
25
05
2019
pubmed:
10
6
2019
medline:
23
6
2020
entrez:
10
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Contemporary child protection systems in the UK need to be seen in light of the late nineteenth century child rescue movement, at a time of curbs in public spending, shifts in attitudes towards children's welfare and the development of social work. There are similarities in the social, institutional and legal contexts, between the nineteenth century and today, centralising 'deservedness', that determined and determines children's access to services. The current article compares historical data and practices of children in care in the UK, encompassing 1881-1918, with contemporary data and practices, through the lens of the deserving/undeserving paradigm, inherited from the Poor Law of 1834. Drawing on two data sets, namely historic children's case files (N = 108), 1881-1918 from the Children's Society (a philanthropic institution) highlighting the perception of custodians, doctors, professionals, as well as children and parents, and current data from interviews with young care leavers and safeguarding practitioners (N = 42), our research focuses on the most disadvantaged children with complex needs and damaging (pre)care experiences. Data is analysed using thematic content analysis, framed within critical realist ontology, taking account of stratified non-linear dynamics of processes at different levels. In both data sets the inability to support certain children is justified by referring to their complex needs and mental health and behavioural problems., Here, the child is held accountable and placed in the 'undeserving' category and consequently misses out on help and support, highlighting a need for awareness, and reflective and reflexive practice among practitioners/professionals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Contemporary child protection systems in the UK need to be seen in light of the late nineteenth century child rescue movement, at a time of curbs in public spending, shifts in attitudes towards children's welfare and the development of social work. There are similarities in the social, institutional and legal contexts, between the nineteenth century and today, centralising 'deservedness', that determined and determines children's access to services.
OBJECTIVE
The current article compares historical data and practices of children in care in the UK, encompassing 1881-1918, with contemporary data and practices, through the lens of the deserving/undeserving paradigm, inherited from the Poor Law of 1834.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING
Drawing on two data sets, namely historic children's case files (N = 108), 1881-1918 from the Children's Society (a philanthropic institution) highlighting the perception of custodians, doctors, professionals, as well as children and parents, and current data from interviews with young care leavers and safeguarding practitioners (N = 42), our research focuses on the most disadvantaged children with complex needs and damaging (pre)care experiences.
METHODS
Data is analysed using thematic content analysis, framed within critical realist ontology, taking account of stratified non-linear dynamics of processes at different levels.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
In both data sets the inability to support certain children is justified by referring to their complex needs and mental health and behavioural problems., Here, the child is held accountable and placed in the 'undeserving' category and consequently misses out on help and support, highlighting a need for awareness, and reflective and reflexive practice among practitioners/professionals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31177068
pii: S0145-2134(19)30187-5
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104025
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Historical Article
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104025Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205858/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.