Single Varietal Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Pastas: Nutritional Profile and Consumer Acceptability.
Dry bean flour
Pastas
Phaseolus vulgaris
Resistant starch
Sensory evaluation
Journal
Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1573-9104
Titre abrégé: Plant Foods Hum Nutr
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8803554
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
10
6
2019
medline:
23
8
2019
entrez:
10
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are a nutrient dense food rich in protein, dietary fiber, minerals, and folate. Consumption of dry beans is relatively low in the United States and this may be due in part to the lack of diversity in bean products beyond whole seeds. Products that incorporate beans in new forms, such as flours, offer the potential to increase dry bean utilization. In this study whole dry beans were milled into flour and used to make gluten free fresh pastas. Six bean varieties each from a different market class (white kidney, navy, otebo, cranberry, dark red kidney and black) were made into pasta. Their consumer appeal was compared to fresh wheat pasta and their nutritional value was compared to fresh wheat pasta and whole boiled beans. The dry bean pastas were nutritionally superior to wheat pasta with higher protein, ash, resistant starch and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) as well as lower total starch content. While consumers preferred the flavor, texture and appearance of the wheat pasta to the dry bean pasta, 36% of participants said they would definitely or probably purchase the dry bean pastas from the light colored beans. There was some loss of nutritional value of bean pasta vs. whole boiled beans but this can mostly be attributed to the bean pasta being 90% bean. These results suggest that single variety fresh dry bean pastas have commercial potential in the U.S. as healthy gluten free pasta options.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31177359
doi: 10.1007/s11130-019-00732-y
pii: 10.1007/s11130-019-00732-y
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dietary Fiber
0
Starch
9005-25-8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
342-349Subventions
Organisme : Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
ID : N/A
Organisme : Agricultural Research Service
ID : N/A
Organisme : Agricultural Research Service
ID : N/A
Références
Diabetologia. 2001 Jul;44(7):805-17
pubmed: 11508264
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):5-56
pubmed: 12081815
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992 Oct;46 Suppl 2:S33-50
pubmed: 1330528
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):932-9
pubmed: 20164321
Food Chem. 2014 Jan 15;143:175-84
pubmed: 24054228
Food Funct. 2014 Mar;5(3):564-72
pubmed: 24492829
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan 24;7:25-37
pubmed: 24493932
Br J Nutr. 2014 Dec 28;112(12):1966-73
pubmed: 25327223
Appetite. 2016 Nov 1;106:92-100
pubmed: 26952560
Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jun 20;5(4):896-903
pubmed: 28748078
Food Funct. 2017 Sep 20;8(9):3139-3144
pubmed: 28771262
Food Res Int. 2017 Oct;100(Pt 2):69-77
pubmed: 28888460
Nutrients. 2018 May 25;10(6):null
pubmed: 29799474
Food Res Int. 2018 Aug;110:22-32
pubmed: 30029702