Evolution of Ovipositor Length in Drosophila suzukii Is Driven by Enhanced Cell Size Expansion and Anisotropic Tissue Reorganization.
Drosophila suzukii
cell apical area
morphological scaling
ovipositor
tissue anisotropy
Journal
Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 06 2019
17 06 2019
Historique:
received:
14
11
2018
revised:
02
04
2019
accepted:
08
05
2019
pubmed:
11
6
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
11
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Morphological diversity is dominated by variation in body proportion [1], which can be described with scaling relationships and mathematical equations, following the pioneering work of D'Arcy Thompson [2] and Julian Huxley [3]. Yet, the cellular processes underlying divergence in size and shape of morphological traits between species remain largely unknown [4-8]. Here, we compare the ovipositors of two related species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. suzukii. D. suzukii has switched its egg-laying niche from rotting to ripe fruit [9]. Along with this shift, the D. suzukii ovipositor has undergone a significant change in size and shape [10]. Using an allometric approach, we find that, while adult ovipositor width has hardly changed between the species, D. suzukii ovipositor length is almost double that of D. melanogaster. We show that this difference mostly arises in a 6-h time window during pupal development. We observe that the developing ovipositors of the two species comprise an almost identical number of cells, with a similar profile of cell shapes and orientations. After cell division stops, we find that the ovipositor area continues to grow in both species through the isotropic expansion of cell apical area and the anisotropic cellular reorganization of the tissue. Remarkably, we find that the lengthening of the D. suzukii ovipositor compared to that of D. melanogaster results from the combination of the accelerated expansion of apical cell size and the enhanced anisotropic rearrangement of cells in the tissue. Therefore, the quantitative fine-tuning of morphogenetic processes can drive evolutionary changes in organ size and shape.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31178315
pii: S0960-9822(19)30555-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.020
pmc: PMC6584362
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2075-2082.e6Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Development. 2000 Jan;127(1):97-107
pubmed: 10654604
Cell. 2000 Aug 4;102(3):349-62
pubmed: 10975525
Science. 2004 Sep 3;305(5689):1462-5
pubmed: 15353802
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 22;275(1645):1875-85
pubmed: 18460425
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;420:265-75
pubmed: 18641953
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 19;106(20):8284-9
pubmed: 19429710
Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):583-6
pubmed: 20220757
Cell. 2010 Sep 3;142(5):773-86
pubmed: 20813263
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2855-60
pubmed: 21282633
J Vis Exp. 2011 Oct 01;(56):null
pubmed: 21989026
PLoS Genet. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002373
pubmed: 22102829
Science. 2012 Feb 24;335(6071):943-7
pubmed: 22363002
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Cell Rep. 2012 Oct 25;2(4):1014-24
pubmed: 23063361
G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Dec 09;3(12):2257-71
pubmed: 24142924
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 26;281(1781):20132840
pubmed: 24573846
Evol Dev. 2014 Mar;16(2):68-77
pubmed: 24617986
J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):2963-75
pubmed: 2512303
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 30;111(39):E4103-9
pubmed: 25197080
Trends Genet. 2015 Jun;31(6):307-15
pubmed: 25921783
Elife. 2015 Jun 23;4:e07090
pubmed: 26102528
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Aug 10;7(12):null
pubmed: 26261282
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 25;6(16):5893-906
pubmed: 27547363
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1478:227-239
pubmed: 27730585
Curr Biol. 2017 Mar 20;27(6):847-853
pubmed: 28285999
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Jul;67:103-112
pubmed: 28454767
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018 Feb;25:9-19
pubmed: 29602367
Dev Cell. 2018 Jul 2;46(1):23-39.e5
pubmed: 29974861
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Nov;41(4):587-640
pubmed: 5342162
Development. 1993 Feb;117(2):509-23
pubmed: 8330522