Differences in initial electrocardiographic findings between ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to left main trunk and left anterior descending artery lesions.
Electrocardiography
Left anterior descending artery
Left main trunk
ST-elevation myocardial infarction
ST-segment depression
ST-segment elevation
Journal
International journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1865-1372
Titre abrégé: Int J Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101469435
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Apr 2019
05 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
12
03
2019
entrez:
11
6
2019
pubmed:
11
6
2019
medline:
11
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early discrimination of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to a left main trunk (LMT) lesion provided by straightforward electrocardiographic criteria is useful for prompt treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate differences in electrocardiographic findings between STEMI due to lesions of LMT and those of left anterior descending artery (LAD). Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings of 435 patients with analyzable ECGs from a cohort of 940 consecutive STEMI patients were analyzed retrospectively for presence of LMT lesions (LMT, n = 39), proximal (pLAD, n = 224) and distal LAD lesions (dLAD, n = 172). ST-segment deviations in 12 leads were assessed among 3 groups without bundle branch block (n = 17 in LMT, n = 180 in pLAD, and n = 159 in dLAD). Magnitudes of ST-segment deviations showed significant differences in leads II, III, aVR aVL, aVF, and V2-V6 across the three groups. This difference suggested two possible characteristic findings in the LMT group, allowing it to be distinguished from the pLAD or dLAD group; (A) larger magnitude of ST-segment depression in lead II than that of ST-segment elevation in lead V2 (47.1% in LMT vs. 0.6% in pLAD vs. 1.3% in dLAD, P < 0.0001), and (B) ST-segment depression in lead V5 (58.8% in LMT vs. 6.7% in pLAD vs. 2.5% in dLAD, P < 0.0001). These findings exhibited superior negative predictive value over conventional ST-segment elevation in lead aVR. A large reciprocal ST-segment depression in inferior leads and ST-segment depression in lead V5 are useful ECG findings allowing determination of STEMI due to an LMT lesion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early discrimination of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to a left main trunk (LMT) lesion provided by straightforward electrocardiographic criteria is useful for prompt treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate differences in electrocardiographic findings between STEMI due to lesions of LMT and those of left anterior descending artery (LAD).
METHODS
METHODS
Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings of 435 patients with analyzable ECGs from a cohort of 940 consecutive STEMI patients were analyzed retrospectively for presence of LMT lesions (LMT, n = 39), proximal (pLAD, n = 224) and distal LAD lesions (dLAD, n = 172). ST-segment deviations in 12 leads were assessed among 3 groups without bundle branch block (n = 17 in LMT, n = 180 in pLAD, and n = 159 in dLAD).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Magnitudes of ST-segment deviations showed significant differences in leads II, III, aVR aVL, aVF, and V2-V6 across the three groups. This difference suggested two possible characteristic findings in the LMT group, allowing it to be distinguished from the pLAD or dLAD group; (A) larger magnitude of ST-segment depression in lead II than that of ST-segment elevation in lead V2 (47.1% in LMT vs. 0.6% in pLAD vs. 1.3% in dLAD, P < 0.0001), and (B) ST-segment depression in lead V5 (58.8% in LMT vs. 6.7% in pLAD vs. 2.5% in dLAD, P < 0.0001). These findings exhibited superior negative predictive value over conventional ST-segment elevation in lead aVR.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A large reciprocal ST-segment depression in inferior leads and ST-segment depression in lead V5 are useful ECG findings allowing determination of STEMI due to an LMT lesion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31179937
doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0227-x
pii: 10.1186/s12245-019-0227-x
pmc: PMC6451257
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
12Références
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jun 15;87(12):1340-5
pubmed: 11397350
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1348-54
pubmed: 11691506
J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):271-6
pubmed: 12861960
Circulation. 2003 Aug 19;108(7):814-9
pubmed: 12885742
Heart. 2004 Sep;90(9):1059-60
pubmed: 15310704
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 1;95(11):1366-9
pubmed: 15904646
J Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;38(4 Suppl):1-7
pubmed: 16226066
Circ J. 2006 May;70(5):525-9
pubmed: 16636484
Eur Heart J. 1991 Apr;12(4):495-502
pubmed: 2065683
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1945;15(4):315-26
pubmed: 21011762
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 15;107(6):827-32
pubmed: 21247545
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2012 Oct;13(10):676-84
pubmed: 23022972
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jun;10(6):883-90
pubmed: 23434620
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2012 Jan;27(1):1-7
pubmed: 24122633
Glob Heart. 2012 Dec;7(4):275-95
pubmed: 25689940
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Dec;32(12):1531-1541
pubmed: 27707525
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1875-1876
pubmed: 27918806
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:142-148
pubmed: 28438354
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2016 Oct;5(4):561-567
pubmed: 28582004
Clin Cardiol. 1988 Sep;11(9):614-8
pubmed: 2976330
Am Heart J. 1983 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1003-9
pubmed: 6637760
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Aug;2(2):251-7
pubmed: 6863761
Acta Clin Belg. 1995;50(3):158-62
pubmed: 7631531
Jpn Circ J. 1993 Sep;57(9):891-7
pubmed: 8371482