Important At-Sea Areas of Colonial Breeding Marine Predators on the Southern Patagonian Shelf.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 06 2019
11 06 2019
Historique:
received:
08
03
2019
accepted:
22
05
2019
entrez:
13
6
2019
pubmed:
13
6
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Patagonian Shelf Large Marine Ecosystem supports high levels of biodiversity and endemism and is one of the most productive marine ecosystems in the world. Despite the important role marine predators play in structuring the ecosystems, areas of high diversity where multiple predators congregate remains poorly known on the Patagonian Shelf. Here, we used biotelemetry and biologging tags to track the movements of six seabird species and three pinniped species breeding at the Falkland Islands. Using Generalized Additive Models, we then modelled these animals' use of space as functions of dynamic and static environmental indices that described their habitat. Based on these models, we mapped the predicted distribution of animals from both sampled and unsampled colonies and thereby identified areas where multiple species were likely to overlap at sea. Maximum foraging trip distance ranged from 79 to 1,325 km. However, most of the 1,891 foraging trips by 686 animals were restricted to the Patagonian Shelf and shelf slope, which highlighted a preference for these habitats. Of the seven candidate explanatory covariates used to predict distribution, distance from the colony was retained in models for all species and negatively affected the probability of occurrence. Predicted overlap among species was highest on the Patagonian Shelf around the Falkland Islands and the Burdwood Bank. The predicted area of overlap is consistent with areas that are also important habitat for marine predators migrating from distant breeding locations. Our findings provide comprehensive multi-species predictions for some of the largest marine predator populations on the Patagonian Shelf, which will contribute to future marine spatial planning initiatives. Crucially, our findings highlight that spatially explicit conservation measures are likely to benefit multiple species, while threats are likely to impact multiple species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31186455
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44695-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-44695-1
pmc: PMC6560117
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8517Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Sherman, K. The Large Marine Ecosystem Concept: Research and Management Strategy for Living Marine Resources. Ecol. Appl. 1, 349–360 (1991).
pubmed: 27755673
doi: 10.2307/1941896
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1998).
doi: 10.1038/387253a0
Sherman, K., Sevilla, N. P. M., Álvarez Torres, P. & Peterson, B. Sustainable development of Latin American and the Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystems. Environ. Dev. 22, 1–8 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.04.001
Belkin, I. M. Rapid warming of Large Marine Ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 81, 207–213 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2009.04.011
Estes, J. A., Heithaus, M., McCauley, D. J., Rasher, D. B. & Worm, B. Megafaunal Impacts on Structure and Function of Ocean Ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 83–116 (2016).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085622
Reid, K. & Croxall, J. P. Environmental response of upper trophic-level predators reveals a system change in an Antarctic marine ecosystem. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 377–384 (2001).
pubmed: 11270434
pmcid: 1088617
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1371
Hunt, G. L. & McKinnell, S. Interplay between top-down, bottom-up, and wasp-waist control in marine ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 68, 115–124 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.02.008
Lynam, C. P. et al. Interaction between top-down and bottom-up control in marine food webs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 1952–1957 (2017).
pubmed: 28167770
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621037114
pmcid: 5338359
Hindell, M. A. et al. Foraging habitats of top predators, and Areas of Ecological Significance, on the Kerguelen Plateau. Kerguelen Plateau Mar. Ecosyst. Fish. 203–215, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003960050133 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s003960050133
Raymond, B. et al. Important marine habitat off east Antarctica revealed by two decades of multi-species predator tracking. Ecography (Cop.). 38, 121–129 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.01021
Lascelles, B. G. et al. Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation. Divers. Distrib. 22, 422–431 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/ddi.12411
Augé, A. A. et al. Framework for mapping key areas for marine megafauna to inform Marine Spatial Planning: The Falkland Islands case study. Mar. Policy 92, 61–72 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.017
Hart, K. M. & Hyrenbach, K. D. Satellite telemetry of marine megavertebrates: The coming of age of an experimental science. Endanger. Species Res. 10, 9–20 (2010).
doi: 10.3354/esr00238
Reisinger, R. R. et al. Habitat modelling of tracking data from multiple marine predators identifies important areas in the Southern Indian Ocean. Divers. Distrib. 1–16, 535–550, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12702 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ddi.12702
Dias, M. P. et al. Using globally threatened pelagic birds to identify priority sites for marine conservation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Biol. Conserv. 211, 76–84 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.009
Block, B. A. et al. Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475, 86–90 (2011).
pubmed: 21697831
doi: 10.1038/nature10082
Grecian, W. J. et al. Seabird diversity hotspot linked to ocean productivity in the Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160024 (2016).
pubmed: 27531154
pmcid: 5014014
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0024
Harrison, A. L. et al. The political biogeography of migratory marine predators. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1571–1578 (2018).
pubmed: 30177802
doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0646-8
Croxall, J. P. & Wood, A. G. The importance of the Patagonian Shelf for top predator species breeding at South Georgia. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 12, 101–118 (2002).
Osborne, M. J. & McIntyre, A. (eds). 2002. The south west Atlantic marine environment: research and management. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. Spec. Issue 12 (1): 1–164 (2002).
Falabella, V., Campagna, C. & Croxall, J. Atlas del Mar Patagónico. Especies y Espacios. Buenos Aires, Wildlife Conservation Society y BirdLife International (2009).
Campagna, C. et al. A species approach to marine ecosystem conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. S122–S147 doi:10.1002/aqc (2008).
Baylis, A. M. M., Crofts, S. & Wolfaardt, A. C. Population trends of gentoo penguins Pygoscelis papua breeding at the Falkland Islands. Mar. Ornithol. 41, 1–5 (2013).
Baylis, A. M. M., Wolfaardt, A. C., Crofts, S., Pistorius, P. A. & Ratcliffe, N. Increasing trend in the number of Southern Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes c. chrysocome) breeding at the Falkland Islands. Polar Biol. 36, 1007–1018 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-013-1324-6
Catry, P., Campos, A., Segurado, P. & Strange, I. Population census and nesting habitat selection of thin-billed prion Pachyptila belcheri on New Island, Falkland Islands. Polar Biol. 26, 202–207 (2003).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-002-0465-9
Wakefield, E. D., Phillips, R. A. & Matthiopoulos, J. Habitat-mediated population limitation in a colonial central-place forager: The sky is not the limit for the black-browed albatross. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20132883 (2014).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2883
Baylis, A. M. M. et al. Re-evaluating the population size of South American fur seals and conservation implications. Aquat. Conserv Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst (2019).
Baylis, A. M. M. et al. Disentangling the cause of a catastrophic population decline in a large marine mammal. Ecology 96, 2834–2847 (2015).
pubmed: 26649403
doi: 10.1890/14-1948.1
Ratcliffe, N. et al. Love thy neighbour or opposites attract? Patterns of spatial segregation and association among crested penguin populations during winter. J. Biogeogr. 41, 1183–1192 (2014).
pubmed: 25505357
pmcid: 4255236
doi: 10.1111/jbi.12279
Baylis, A. M. M., Tierney, M., Staniland, I. J. & Brickle, P. Habitat use of adult male South American fur seals and a preliminary assessment of spatial overlap with trawl fisheries in the South Atlantic. Mamm. Biol. 93, 76–81 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2018.07.007
Catry, P. et al. Predicting the distribution of a threatened albatross: The importance of competition, fisheries and annual variability. Prog. Oceanogr. 110, 1–10 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2013.01.005
Baylis, A. M. M. et al. Diving deeper into individual foraging specializations of a large marine predator, the southern sea lion. Oecologia 179, 1053–1065 (2015).
pubmed: 26323982
doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3421-4
Wakefield, E. D. et al. Habitat preference, accessibility and competiton limit the global distribution of breeding black-browed albatrosses. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 141–167 (2011).
doi: 10.1890/09-0763.1
Robson, B. W. et al. Separation of foraging habitat among breeding sites of a colonial marine predator, the northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus). Fish. Sci. 29, 20–29 (2004).
Masello, J. F., Kato, A., Sommerfeld, J., Mattern, T. & Quillfeldt, P. How animals distribute themselves in space: Variable energy landscapes. Front. Zool. 14, 1–14 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0219-8
Wakefield, E. D. et al. Space Partitioning Without Territoriality in Gannets. Science 341, 68–70 (2013).
pubmed: 23744776
doi: 10.1126/science.1236077
Warwick-Evans, V. et al. Using habitat models for chinstrap penguins Pygoscelis antarctica to advise krill fisheries management during the penguin breeding season. Divers. Distrib. 1–16, 1756–1771, https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12817 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ddi.12817
Cairns, A. D. K. The Regulation of Seabird Colony Size: A Hinterland Model. Am. Nat. 134, 141–146 (1989).
doi: 10.1086/284970
Wakefield, E. D. et al. Breeding density, fine-scale tracking, and large-scale modeling reveal the regional distribution of four seabird species. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2074–2091 (2017).
pubmed: 28653410
doi: 10.1002/eap.1591
Gonzalez Carman, V. et al. Distribution of megafaunal species in the Southwestern Atlantic: key ecological areas and opportunities for marine conservation. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73, 1579–1588 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsw019
Nicholls, D. G. et al. Foraging niches of three Diomedea albatrosses. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 231, 269–277 (2002).
doi: 10.3354/meps231269
Schejter, L. et al. Namuncura Marine Marine Protected Area: an oceanic hot spot Namuncura of benthic biodiversity at Burdwood Bank, Argentina. Polar Biol. 2373–2386, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-1913-2 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-016-1913-2
Clausen, A. P. & Pütz, K. Winter diet and foraging range of gentoo penguins (Pygoscelis papua) from Kidney Cove, Falkland Islands. Polar Biol. 26, 32–40 (2003).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-002-0443-2
McConnell, B. J., Chambers, C. & Fedak, M. A. Foraging ecology of southern elephant seals in relation to the bathyrnetry and productivity of the Southern Ocean. Antarct. Sci. 4, 393–398 (1992).
doi: 10.1017/S0954102092000580
Trathan, P. N. et al. Managing fishery development in sensitive ecosystems: identifying penguin habitat use to direct management in Antarctica. Ecosphere 9 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2392
Baylis, A. M. M., Tierney, M., Orben, R. A., Staniland, I. J. & Brickle, P. Geographic variation in the foraging behaviour of South American fur seals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 596, 233–245 (2018).
doi: 10.3354/meps12557
Masello, J. F. et al. Diving seabirds share foraging space and time within and among species. Ecosphere 1, 1–28 (2010).
doi: 10.1890/ES10-00103.1
Torres, L. G. et al. Poor transferability of species distribution models for a pelagic predator, the grey petrel, indicates contrasting habitat preferences across ocean basins. PLoS One 10, 1–18 (2015).
Paton, R. S. & Matthiopoulos, J. Defining the scale of habitat availability for models of habitat selection. Ecology 97, 1113–1122 (2016).
pubmed: 27349089
Phillips, R. A., Silk, J. R. D., Croxall, J. P. & Afanasyev, V. Year-round distribution of white-chinned petrels from South Georgia: Relationships with oceanography and fisheries. Biol. Conserv. 129, 336–347 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.046
Peterson, R. G. & Whitworth, T. III The subantarctic and polar fronts in relation to deep water masses through the southwestern Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 10817–10838 (1989).
doi: 10.1029/JC094iC08p10817
Thiers, L., Delord, K., Bost, C. A., Guinet, C. & Weimerskirch, H. Important marine sectors for the top predator community around Kerguelen Archipelago. Polar Biol. 40, 365–378 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-016-1964-4
Handley, J. M., Connan, M., Baylis, A. M. M., Brickle, P. & Pistorius, P. Jack of all prey, master of some: Influence of habitat on the feeding ecology of a diving marine predator. Mar. Biol. 164, 82 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00227-017-3113-1
Baylis, A. M. M., Arnould, J. & Staniland, I. J. Diet of South American fur seals at the Falkland Islands. Mar. Mammal Sci. 30, 1210–1219 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/mms.12090
Thompson, D., Duck, C. D., McConnell, B. J. & Garrett, J. Foraging behaviour and diet of lactating female southern sea lions (Otaria flavescens) in the Falkland Islands. J. Zool. 246, 135–146 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00142.x
Cherel, Y., Pütz, K. & Hobson, K. Summer diet of king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) at the Falkland Islands, southern Atlantic Ocean. Polar Biol. 25, 898–906 (2002).
doi: 10.1007/s00300-002-0419-2
Arkhipkin, A., Brickle, P. & Laptikhovsky, V. Links between marine fauna and oceanic fronts on the Patagonian Shelf and Slope. Arquipel. - Life Mar. Sci. 30, 19–37 (2013).
Jennings, S. et al. Global-scale predictions of community and ecosystem properties from simple ecological theory. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275, 1375–1383 (2008).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0192
Agnew, D. J. Critical aspects of the Falkland Islands pelagic ecosystem: distribution, spawning and migration of pelagic animals in relation to oil exploration. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 12, 39–50 (2002).
doi: 10.1002/aqc.474
Orians, G. & Pearson, N. On the theory of central place foraging. In Analysis of Ecological Systems, eds D. J. Horn, R. D. Mitchell, and G. R. Stairs (Ohio Univ Press, Athens, OH), 155–177 (1979).
Arkhipkin, A. I., Brickle, P., Laptikhovsky, V. & Winter, A. Dining hall at sea: feeding migrations of nektonic predators to the eastern Patagonian Shelf. J. Fish Biol. 81, 882–902 (2012).
pubmed: 22803740
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03359.x
Scales, K. L. et al. Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat models for wide-ranging marine predators to the resolution of environmental data. Ecography (Cop.). 40, 210–220 (2017).
doi: 10.1111/ecog.02272
Blockley, D. & Tierney, M. Addressing priority gaps in understanding ecosystem functioning for the developing Falkland Islands offshore hydrocarbon industry – the ‘Gap Project’. Phase I Final Report, September 2016. Report prepared for the Falkland Islands Offshore Hydrocarbons Env. (2017).
Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science. 314, 787–790 (2006).
pubmed: 17082450
doi: 10.1126/science.1132294
Combes, V. & Matano, R. P. The Patagonian shelf circulation: Drivers and variability. Prog. Oceanogr. 167, 24–43 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2018.07.003
Freitas, C., Lydersen, C., Fedak, M. A. & Kovacs, K. M. A simple new algorithm to filter marine mammal Argos locations. Mar. Mammal Sci. 24, 315–325 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00180.x
Johnson, D., London, J., Lea, M. & Durban, J. Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology 89, 1208–1215 (2008).
pubmed: 18543615
doi: 10.1890/07-1032.1
Costa, D. P. et al. Accuracy of ARGOS locations of Pinnipeds at-sea estimated using Fastloc GPS. PLoS One 5, e8677 (2010).
pubmed: 20090942
pmcid: 2806907
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008677
Calenge, C., Dray, S. & Royer-Carenzi, M. The concept of animals’ trajectories from a data analysis perspective. Ecol. Inform. 4, 34–41 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.10.002
Aarts, G., MacKenzie, M., McConnell, B., Fedak, M. & Matthiopoulos, J. Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography (Cop.). 31, 140–160 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05236.x
Matthiopoulos, J. The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. Ecol. Modell. 159, 239–268 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00293-4
Huin, N. Foraging distribution of the black-browed albatross,Thalassarche melanophris, breeding in the Falkland Islands. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 12, 89–99 (2002).
doi: 10.1002/aqc.479
Baylis, A. M. M. et al. Habitat use and spatial fidelity of male South American sea lions during the nonbreeding period. Ecol. Evol. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2972 (2017).
pubmed: 28616194
pmcid: 5468127
doi: 10.1002/ece3.2972
Pistorius, P. A., Baylis, A. M. M., Crofts, S. & Pütz, K. Population development and historical occurrence of king penguins at the Falkland Islands. Antarct. Sci. 6, 1–6 (2012).
Galimberti, F., Sanvito, S., Boitani, L. & Fabiani, A. Viability of the southern elephant seal population of the Falkland Islands. Anim. Conserv. 81–88 (2001).
Manly, B., McDonald, L., Thomas, D., McDonald, T. & Erickson, W. Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004).