Influence of commissioned provider type and deprivation score on uptake of the childhood flu immunization.


Journal

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1741-3850
Titre abrégé: J Public Health (Oxf)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101188638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 08 2020
Historique:
received: 27 12 2018
revised: 10 04 2019
pubmed: 13 6 2019
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 13 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since 2015/16 the UK seasonal influenza immunization programme has included children aged 5 and 6 years. In the South West of England school-based providers, GPs or community pharmacies were commissioned to deliver the vaccine depending on the locality. We aimed to assess variation in vaccine uptake in relation to the type of commissioned provider, and levels of socioeconomic deprivation. Data from the South West of England (2015-16 season) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression to assess variation in vaccine uptake by type of commissioned provider, allowing for clustering of children within delivery sites. Overall uptake in 5 and 6 year olds was 34.3% (37 555/109 404). Vaccine uptake was highest when commissioned through school-based programmes 50.2% (9983/19 867) and lowest when commissioned through pharmacies, 23.1% (4269/18 479). Delivery through schools resulted in less variation by site and equal uptake across age groups, in contrast to GP and pharmacy delivery for which uptake was lower among 6 year olds. Vaccine uptake decreased with increasing levels of deprivation across all types of commissioned provider. School-based programmes achieve the highest and most consistent rates of childhood influenza vaccination. Interventions are still needed to promote more equitable uptake of the childhood influenza vaccine.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Since 2015/16 the UK seasonal influenza immunization programme has included children aged 5 and 6 years. In the South West of England school-based providers, GPs or community pharmacies were commissioned to deliver the vaccine depending on the locality. We aimed to assess variation in vaccine uptake in relation to the type of commissioned provider, and levels of socioeconomic deprivation.
METHODS
Data from the South West of England (2015-16 season) were analysed using multilevel logistic regression to assess variation in vaccine uptake by type of commissioned provider, allowing for clustering of children within delivery sites.
RESULTS
Overall uptake in 5 and 6 year olds was 34.3% (37 555/109 404). Vaccine uptake was highest when commissioned through school-based programmes 50.2% (9983/19 867) and lowest when commissioned through pharmacies, 23.1% (4269/18 479). Delivery through schools resulted in less variation by site and equal uptake across age groups, in contrast to GP and pharmacy delivery for which uptake was lower among 6 year olds. Vaccine uptake decreased with increasing levels of deprivation across all types of commissioned provider.
CONCLUSION
School-based programmes achieve the highest and most consistent rates of childhood influenza vaccination. Interventions are still needed to promote more equitable uptake of the childhood influenza vaccine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31188441
pii: 5514183
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz060
doi:

Substances chimiques

Influenza Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

618-624

Informations de copyright

© Crown copyright 2019.

Auteurs

Hannah Christensen (H)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.

Rosy Reynolds (R)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK.

Rachel Kwiatkowska (R)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK.
Field Services, National Infection Service, Public Health England South West, 2 Rivergate Bristol, UK.

Ellen Brooks-Pollock (E)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.
Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK.

Matthew Dominey (M)

Screening and Immunisation Team, Public Health England South West, 2 Rivergate Bristol, UK.
NHS England-South (South West), South Plaza, Marlborough Street, Bristol, UK.

Adam Finn (A)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.
Department of Paediatric Immunology, Bristol Children's Hospital, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol, UK.

Ardiana Gjini (A)

Screening and Immunisation Team, Public Health England South West, 2 Rivergate Bristol, UK.
NHS England-South (South West), South Plaza, Marlborough Street, Bristol, UK.

Matthew Hickman (M)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road Bristol, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK.

Marion Roderick (M)

NHS England-South (South West), South Plaza, Marlborough Street, Bristol, UK.

Julie Yates (J)

Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Bristol, UK.
Screening and Immunisation Team, Public Health England South West, 2 Rivergate Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH