Tissue engineering of the urethra: where are we in 2019?


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 06 03 2019
accepted: 27 05 2019
pubmed: 14 6 2019
medline: 7 5 2021
entrez: 14 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this review is to assess the potential role of tissue engineering for urethral reconstruction. It is well- recognised that urethrotomy remains the first-line therapy in the treatment of urethral stricture. Following on from the randomised study which recommended no difference between urethrotomy and urethral dilation, Steenkamp et al. reported long-term success rates of only 20%. Patients with longer strictures, penile or distal urethral strictures, and extensive periurethral spongiofibrosis typically do not respond well to repeated incisions. This report reviews the potential role of tissue engineering as applied to augmentation urethroplasty, which is the treatment of choice following failed urethrotomy. A review of the literature was carried out. The principal emphasis was on tissue engineering as applied to augmentation urethroplasty, but an introductory section reviews the use of urethrotomy and the background to contemporary practise with augmentation urethroplasty using oral mucosa. It is evident that a cellular matrix which requires the ingrowth of cells is unlikely to be successful except for very short strictures. Other approaches such as injection of stem cells have not been adequately trialled in humans to date. Tissue-engineered substitute for autologous oral mucosa has been used and the results relating to this are reviewed. Tissue engineering of autologous tissue for urethroplasty is expensive. It is unnecessary for the majority of cases, but could be potentially useful for very lengthy strictures, for instance, relating to lichen sclerosis. Whilst tissue-engineered oral mucosa has been successfully used, a great deal more work would be necessary to develop an appropriate matrix. Another study has looked at a larger series using an alternative tissue-engineered substitute, but the results have been very disappointing. At present, it has to be concluded that there is no effective and validated tissue engineering solution for the management of urethral stricture disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31190151
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02826-3
pii: 10.1007/s00345-019-02826-3
pmc: PMC7423849
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2101-2105

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Sep;42(3):565-8
pubmed: 19949861
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):856-61
pubmed: 21803482
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):356-8
pubmed: 9679876
Eur Urol. 2012 Oct;62(4):624-7
pubmed: 22749735
Lancet. 2008 Dec 20;372(9656):2104
pubmed: 19101373
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:181-91
pubmed: 25446139
Eur Urol. 2008 Jun;53(6):1263-9
pubmed: 18262717
EBioMedicine. 2017 Sep;23:185-192
pubmed: 28827035
Lancet. 2011 Apr 2;377(9772):1175-82
pubmed: 21388673
World J Urol. 2008 Aug;26(4):323-6
pubmed: 18682960
Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Jul;45(7):1795-1806
pubmed: 28536786
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1702-8; discussion 1708
pubmed: 17306922
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):594-606
pubmed: 28385451
Asian J Urol. 2018 Apr;5(2):69-77
pubmed: 29736368
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):246-53
pubmed: 22014966
J Urol. 2001 Jun;165(6 Pt 1):2096-102
pubmed: 11371935
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):797-814
pubmed: 21353379
J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1432-6
pubmed: 18295282
BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):922-7
pubmed: 15476537
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016 Jul;241(13):1416-28
pubmed: 27022134
Eur Urol. 2007 Apr;51(4):1089-92; discussion 1092
pubmed: 17157434
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Mar;30(3):301-7
pubmed: 25729254
Cell Tissue Res. 2018 Nov;374(2):303-315
pubmed: 30066105
Urol J. 2011 Spring;8(2):132-6
pubmed: 21656472
Urology. 2014 Mar;83(3 Suppl):S31-47
pubmed: 24411214
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):790-1
pubmed: 25065526
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):607-609
pubmed: 28479204
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):917-8
pubmed: 26056069
Nat Rev Urol. 2018 Dec;15(12):717-718
pubmed: 30266941
Cytotherapy. 2014 Dec;16(12):1601-13
pubmed: 25457172
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2466-9
pubmed: 17937943
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1538-42
pubmed: 18710759
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:38-46
pubmed: 25477304
BMJ. 2018 Jul 12;362:k3100
pubmed: 30002056
J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):98-101
pubmed: 8976225
Transplant Proc. 2013 Mar;45(2):730-4
pubmed: 23498814
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0118653
pubmed: 25689740
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 2):1789-92; discussion 1792-3
pubmed: 12352360
World J Urol. 2006 Sep;24(4):429-37
pubmed: 16783573

Auteurs

Christopher Chapple (C)

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK. c.r.chapple@shef.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH