Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Posterior Parietal Cortex Modulates Line-Length Estimation but Not Illusory Depth Perception.
landmark task
necker cube
posterior parietal cortex
rTMS
visuospatial attention
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
15
12
2018
accepted:
03
05
2019
entrez:
14
6
2019
pubmed:
14
6
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) may affect attentional processing when applied to the right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) of healthy participants in line with neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence on the neural bases of this cognitive function. Specifically, the application of TMS to right PPC induces a rightward attentional bias on line length estimation in healthy participants (i.e., neglect-like bias), mimicking the rightward bias shown by patients with unilateral spatial neglect after damage of the right PPC. With the present study, we investigated whether right PPC might play a crucial role in attentional processing of illusory depth perception, given the evidence that a rightward bias may be observed in patients with neglect during perception of the Necker Cube (NC). To this end, we investigated the effects of low-frequency rTMS applied to the right or left PPC on attentional disambiguation of the NC in two groups of healthy participants. To control for the effectiveness of TMS on visuospatial attention, rTMS effects were also assessed on a frequently used line length estimation (i.e., the Landmark Task or LT). Both groups also received sham stimulation. RTMS of the right or left PPC did not affect NC perception. On the other hand, rTMS of the right PPC (but not left PPC) induces neglect-like bias on the LT, in line with previous studies. These findings confirm that right PPC is involved in deployment of spatial attention on line length estimation. Interestingly, they suggest that this brain region does not critically contribute to deployment of visuospatial attention during attentional disambiguation of the Necker Cube. Future investigations, targeting different areas of fronto-parietal circuits, are necessary to further explore the neuro-functional bases of attentional contribution to illusory depth perception.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31191393
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01169
pmc: PMC6540782
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1169Références
Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):131-40
pubmed: 10050901
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Mar 24;282(3):145-8
pubmed: 10717412
Neuroreport. 2000 May 15;11(7):1519-21
pubmed: 10841369
Cortex. 2000 Dec;36(5):671-7
pubmed: 11195913
Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S52-8
pubmed: 11373133
Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):950-3
pubmed: 11418859
Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 8;12(11):2605-7
pubmed: 11496157
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(11):1138-43
pubmed: 11527550
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Oct;23(5):599-607
pubmed: 11778637
Cortex. 2002 Apr;38(2):253-7; discussion 258-60
pubmed: 12056693
Neuroreport. 2002 Dec 20;13(18):2571-5
pubmed: 12499870
Brain. 2003 Sep;126(Pt 9):1986-97
pubmed: 12821519
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Sep;18(5):1206-12
pubmed: 12956719
Am J Psychol. 1954 Jun;67(2):341-2
pubmed: 13158652
Am J Psychol. 1955 Sep;68(3):358-71
pubmed: 13248970
Percept Mot Skills. 1962 Dec;15:611-25
pubmed: 13990202
Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Oct;17:539-46
pubmed: 14057273
Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Oct;17:571-82
pubmed: 14057281
Nature. 1992 Nov 5;360(6399):73-5
pubmed: 1436078
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(2):226-37
pubmed: 14557915
Cortex. 1992 Dec;28(4):525-35
pubmed: 1478083
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Oct;14(10):1164-72
pubmed: 15142954
Brain. 2004 Oct;127(Pt 10):2307-15
pubmed: 15292055
Neuroscientist. 2006 Apr;12(2):153-63
pubmed: 16514012
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Sep 25;247(2):144-8
pubmed: 16730028
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):247-57
pubmed: 17119302
Brain. 2007 Aug;130(Pt 8):2070-84
pubmed: 17584772
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):55-65
pubmed: 18424780
J Neuropsychol. 2009 Mar;3(Pt 1):31-43
pubmed: 19338715
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039
pubmed: 19833552
Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):697-702
pubmed: 2027485
Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2010 Jun 03;4 Suppl 1:S7
pubmed: 20522268
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Dec 17;6:326
pubmed: 23251130
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1702-12
pubmed: 23827785
Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-Dec;7(6):912-4
pubmed: 25178660
Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 31;5:1238
pubmed: 25400612
Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):795-800
pubmed: 25732371
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jun;72:12-21
pubmed: 25865584
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138379
pubmed: 26378925
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Feb;11(1):17-29
pubmed: 26781482
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:158-166
pubmed: 27154625
Front Neurol. 2017 Mar 03;8:66
pubmed: 28316586
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Jan;24(1):22-32
pubmed: 28791940
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Sep;54:113-115
pubmed: 29628330
J Adv Res. 2019 Jan 26;18:95-100
pubmed: 30828479
Vision Res. 1987;27(9):1513-26
pubmed: 3445485
Perception. 1986;15(5):563-72
pubmed: 3588216
Scand J Psychol. 1972;13(1):61-5
pubmed: 5048025
Br J Physiol Opt. 1966;23(4):242-8
pubmed: 5982447
Vision Res. 1978;18(7):853-4
pubmed: 676094
Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1993 Aug;2(2):389-413
pubmed: 8137006
Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Jun;44(3 Pt 1):1015-9
pubmed: 876774
Neuroreport. 1997 Nov 10;8(16):3537-40
pubmed: 9427322
Brain Cogn. 1998 Aug;37(3):369-86
pubmed: 9733555