Development and Implementation of a Three-dimensional Printed Knee Joint Simulation Model Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Addressing Local Simulation Needs.

3d printing simulation

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez: 14 6 2019
pubmed: 14 6 2019
medline: 14 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Knee joint injections and aspirations are essential procedures for medical students, residents, and primary care physicians to master. Simulation-based training has been shown to improve learner confidence and performance scores in knee joint injections. Current knee joint simulators are expensive, ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars. Using three-dimensional (3D) printing and gel layering technology, we designed and manufactured an inexpensive simulator. The aim of this implementation study was to gather the opinions of local simulation specialists and administrators regarding the simulator's curricular implementation. Methods Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we developed a 31-item implementation survey. It was administered to local simulation specialists and administrators. The purpose of the survey was to identify the aspects of the simulator that they deemed important to the implementation process, as well as obtain their qualitative feedback about the design. Results In total, three participants completed the survey. There were 16 survey items that were rated as very important, including local manufacturing, appropriate planning, internal development, evidence-based development, and reasonable costs. Another nine items were deemed important, including the adaptability of the product and ability to test the product. The simulation specialists also expressed some concerns they had with the design of the simulator and made suggestions about how we could address these concerns. Conclusions Local development and manufacturing, coupled with appropriate pre-implementation planning and efficacy evidence, were selected as factors that would potentially contribute to the success of the implementation of the simulator in the local curriculum.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31192069
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4364
pmc: PMC6550513
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4364

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):524-8
pubmed: 23541545
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 May;41(5):503-8
pubmed: 12011372
Can Fam Physician. 2005 Oct;51:1364-5
pubmed: 16926970
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2664-9
pubmed: 17182991
CJEM. 2018 Jan;20(1):132-141
pubmed: 28511730
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;46(8):1390-1394
pubmed: 29884316
Dermatol Surg. 2013 Jan;39(1 Pt 1):76-81
pubmed: 23205759
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Cureus. 2018 Dec 20;10(12):e3754
pubmed: 30820374
Cureus. 2018 Dec 21;10(12):e3764
pubmed: 30868000
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jun;17(6):441-5
pubmed: 12133158
J Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;34(7):1576-9
pubmed: 17516616
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):219-32
pubmed: 23728476

Auteurs

Eugene Krustev (E)

Medical Education and Simulation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.

Adam Dubrowski (A)

Emergency Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN.

Classifications MeSH