Effective recruitment for practice-based research: Lessons from the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study.
Complex behavioral intervention
Lifestyle intervention
Population health registries
Practice-based clinical trial
Practice-based research
Primary care
Recruitment strategies
Weight loss interventions
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
26
10
2018
revised:
20
03
2019
accepted:
30
04
2019
entrez:
14
6
2019
pubmed:
14
6
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aims: The REAL HEALTH Diabetes Study is a practice-based randomized clinical trial that compares the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention aimed at weight reduction to medical nutrition therapy in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper describes a tiered approach to recruitment, the resultant enrollment rates of sequentially more intensive recruitment strategies, and identifies barriers to participation. Potential participants were identified using patient health registries and classified by recruitment site. Four recruitment strategies were used to achieve target enrollment: (1) mail/telephone outreach; (2) direct referral from providers; (3) orientation sessions; and (4) media/advertising. Reasons for ineligibility and non-participation were tracked. Fifteen thousand two hundred sixty-nine (15,269) potential participants were identified from all sources, with the clear majority coming from patient registries. Mail/telephone outreach alone had the lowest enrollment rate (1.2%). Direct referral and orientation sessions superimposed on mail/telephone outreach was used for fewer participants but had greater enrollment rates (27% and 52%.) Media/advertising was ineffective. The most commonly reported reasons for non-participation were not wanting to be in a research (30%) or a weight loss program (22%); time commitment (20%); and distance/transportation (14%). The use of population registries to identify potential participants coupled with successively more intensive recruitment strategies, executed in a tiered approach moving toward personal engagement to establish trust and credibility, maximized recruitment enrollment rates. Our findings regarding facilitators and barriers to recruitment could be used to inform other practice-based research or to engage patients in group interventions in usual care settings. NCT02320253.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aims: The REAL HEALTH Diabetes Study is a practice-based randomized clinical trial that compares the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention aimed at weight reduction to medical nutrition therapy in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper describes a tiered approach to recruitment, the resultant enrollment rates of sequentially more intensive recruitment strategies, and identifies barriers to participation.
METHODS
METHODS
Potential participants were identified using patient health registries and classified by recruitment site. Four recruitment strategies were used to achieve target enrollment: (1) mail/telephone outreach; (2) direct referral from providers; (3) orientation sessions; and (4) media/advertising. Reasons for ineligibility and non-participation were tracked.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fifteen thousand two hundred sixty-nine (15,269) potential participants were identified from all sources, with the clear majority coming from patient registries. Mail/telephone outreach alone had the lowest enrollment rate (1.2%). Direct referral and orientation sessions superimposed on mail/telephone outreach was used for fewer participants but had greater enrollment rates (27% and 52%.) Media/advertising was ineffective. The most commonly reported reasons for non-participation were not wanting to be in a research (30%) or a weight loss program (22%); time commitment (20%); and distance/transportation (14%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of population registries to identify potential participants coupled with successively more intensive recruitment strategies, executed in a tiered approach moving toward personal engagement to establish trust and credibility, maximized recruitment enrollment rates. Our findings regarding facilitators and barriers to recruitment could be used to inform other practice-based research or to engage patients in group interventions in usual care settings.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT02320253.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31193095
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100374
pii: S2451-8654(18)30166-2
pii: 100374
pmc: PMC6517530
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02320253']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100374Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R18 DK102737
Pays : United States
Références
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Aug;15(8):591-9
pubmed: 10940152
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1374-83
pubmed: 17363746
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):853-7
pubmed: 17606183
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Apr;108(4 Suppl 1):S66-72
pubmed: 18358260
Fam Pract. 2008 Apr;25(2):105-12
pubmed: 18417465
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1069-74
pubmed: 19167143
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1153-8
pubmed: 20332353
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1088-94
pubmed: 23359362
Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 16;108(7):1402-7
pubmed: 23511558
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Dec;68(12):1549-58
pubmed: 23716501
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):5-13
pubmed: 24307184
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:31-8
pubmed: 25545027
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Sep;23(9):1792-9
pubmed: 26260043
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):99-105
pubmed: 28949839
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:9-17
pubmed: 29803816