Predictive value of genetic testing for inherited retinal diseases in patients with suspected atypical autoimmune retinopathy.
Autoimmune retinopathy
Cancer associated-retinopathy
Genetic testing
Inherited retinal degeneration
Journal
American journal of ophthalmology case reports
ISSN: 2451-9936
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101679941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
18
10
2018
revised:
23
03
2019
accepted:
06
05
2019
entrez:
14
6
2019
pubmed:
14
6
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The clinical features of autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) can resemble and be difficult to differentiate from inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs). Misdiagnosis of an IRD as AIR causes unnecessary treatment with immunosuppressive agents. The purpose of this study is to calculate the predictive value of genetic testing for IRDs in patients with suspected AIR and provide clinical examples where genetic testing has been useful. We identified patients seen at MEEI between April 2013 and January 2017 for whom the differentiation of AIR vs. IRDs was difficult based on clinical assessment alone. All patients had some atypical features for AIR, but tested positive for anti-retinal antibodies. Within this group, we identified six patients who had genetic testing for IRDs with the Genetic Eye Disease panel for retinal genes (GEDi-R). We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of genetic testing in a population with approximately equal numbers of IRD and AIR patients. Six patients had clinical features that made distinguishing between IRDs and AIR on a clinical basis difficult and were sent for genetic testing: four women and two men with a mean age of 59.5 years. In two of these six patients, genetic diagnoses were made based upon the identification of known pathogenic variants in the common IRD genes In patients for whom the differential diagnosis of AIR and IRDs is unclear based on clinical information, genetic testing can be a valuable tool when it identifies an IRD, sparing the patient unnecessary immunosuppressive treatment. However, the test has a low NPV so a negative genetic testing result does not confidently exclude IRD as the true diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31193260
doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2019.100461
pii: S2451-9936(18)30465-1
pii: 100461
pmc: PMC6523031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100461Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;127(5):565-73
pubmed: 10334350
Hear Res. 2002 Jan;163(1-2):1-11
pubmed: 11788194
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Sep 1;30(17):3894-900
pubmed: 12202775
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3812-4
pubmed: 12824425
Nat Genet. 1992 Jun;1(3):209-13
pubmed: 1303237
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;139(5):780-94
pubmed: 15860281
J Neuroophthalmol. 2008 Mar;28(1):5-11
pubmed: 18347451
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Dec;49(12):5532-9
pubmed: 18641288
Autoimmun Rev. 2009 Mar;8(5):410-4
pubmed: 19168157
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;127(4):390-7
pubmed: 19365013
N Engl J Med. 1990 Nov 8;323(19):1302-7
pubmed: 2215617
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;157(2):266-272.e1
pubmed: 24315290
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Oct 16;5(2):a017111
pubmed: 25324231
Genet Med. 2015 Apr;17(4):253-261
pubmed: 25412400
N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 7;321(23):1589-94
pubmed: 2555714
Clin Genet. 2016 Feb;89(2):173-81
pubmed: 25678066
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;168:183-190
pubmed: 27210277
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11
pubmed: 27683318
Retina. 2017 Mar;37(3):417-423
pubmed: 27753762
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1314-1331
pubmed: 28559085
Mol Vis. 2017 Oct 10;23:695-706
pubmed: 29062221
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;188:xiv-xv
pubmed: 29396036
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1074:193-201
pubmed: 29721944
Br J Ophthalmol. 1985 Oct;69(10):758-64
pubmed: 4052361
J Autoimmun. 1998 Oct;11(5):523-33
pubmed: 9802939