Single-Arm Phases 1 and 2 Trial of Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Carcinoma.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2019
01 Aug 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
14
6
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
entrez:
14
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma frequently develop resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy, at which time treatment options become limited. To evaluate the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor niraparib combined with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma. The TOPACIO/KEYNOTE-162 (Niraparib in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer) trial, an open-label, single-arm phases 1 and 2 study enrolled women with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or recurrent ovarian carcinoma, irrespective of BRCA mutation status. Median follow-up was 12.4 months (range, 1.2 to ≥23.0 months). Data were collected from April 15, 2016, through September 4, 2018, with September 4, 2018, as a data cutoff, and analyzed from September 4, 2018, through January 30, 2019. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 200 mg of oral niraparib once daily and 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary objectives of phase 1 were to evaluate dose-limiting toxic effects and establish the RP2D and dosing schedule. The primary objective of phase 2 was to assess objective response rate (ORR; complete plus partial responses). Results from the phase 1 ovarian carcinoma and TNBC cohorts and phase 2 ovarian carcinoma cohort are reported. Because of the similarity in the phase 1 and 2 ovarian carcinoma populations, the data were pooled to perform an integrated efficacy analysis. Fourteen patients (9 with ovarian carcinoma and 5 with TNBC) in phase 1 and 53 patients with ovarian carcinoma in phase 2 were enrolled, for a pooled ovarian carcinoma cohort of 62 patients (median age, 60 years [range, 46-83 years]). In the integrated efficacy phases 1 and 2 ovarian carcinoma population (60 of 62 evaluable patients), ORR was 18% (90% CI, 11%-29%), with a disease control rate of 65% (90% CI, 54%-75%), including 3 (5%) with confirmed complete responses, 8 (13%) with confirmed partial responses, 28 (47%) with stable disease, and 20 (33%) with progressive disease. The ORRs were consistent across subgroups based on platinum-based chemotherapy sensitivity, previous bevacizumab treatment, or tumor BRCA or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker status. Median duration of response was not reached (range, 4.2 to ≥14.5 months). At data cutoff, 2 patients with a response and 1 patient with stable disease continued to receive treatment. Niraparib in combination with pembrolizumab is tolerable, with promising antitumor activity for patients with ovarian carcinoma who have limited treatment options regardless of platinum status, biomarker status, or prior treatment with bevacizumab. Responses in patients without tumor BRCA mutations or non-HRD cancers were higher than expected with either agent as monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02657889.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31194228
pii: 2735889
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1048
pmc: PMC6567832
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02657889']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1141-1149Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA013148
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Jun;97(3):862-9
pubmed: 15894355
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec;375(22):2154-2164
pubmed: 27717299
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 9;361(2):123-34
pubmed: 19553641
Invest New Drugs. 2017 Dec;35(6):751-765
pubmed: 28303528
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 12;9(1):1853
pubmed: 30755715
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):852-61
pubmed: 21862407
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 20;28(15):2512-9
pubmed: 20406929
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2375-91
pubmed: 26371282
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jan;166(1):94-8
pubmed: 23088893
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jun;137(3):386-91
pubmed: 25818403
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 24;8(1):1751
pubmed: 29170499
Cancer Res. 2019 Jan 15;79(2):311-319
pubmed: 30482774
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Aug;14(9):882-92
pubmed: 23810788
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1080-1087
pubmed: 31046082
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8
pubmed: 24637997
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;23(14):3711-3720
pubmed: 28167507
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):267-275
pubmed: 28882436
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3592-9
pubmed: 24002522
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):199-203
pubmed: 26723501
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1784-1792
pubmed: 29767688