Time trends in prostate cancer screening in Swiss primary care (2010 to 2017) - A retrospective study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
01
2019
accepted:
20
05
2019
entrez:
14
6
2019
pubmed:
14
6
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Following years of controversy regarding screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen, evidence evolves towards a more restrained and preference-based use. This study reports the impact of landmark trials and updated recommendations on the incidence rate of prostate cancer screening by Swiss general practitioners. We performed a retrospective analysis of primary care data, separated in 3 time periods based on dates of publications of important prostate-specific antigen screening recommendations. 1: 2010-mid 2012 including 2 updates; 2: mid 2012-mid 2014 including a Smarter Medicine recommendation; 3: mid-2014-mid-2017 maintenance period. Period 2 including the Smarter Medicine recommendation was defined as reference period. We further assessed the influence of patient's age and the number of prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) tests, by the patient and within each time period, on the mean PSA concentration. Uni- and multivariable analyses were used as needed. 36,800 men aged 55 to 75 years were included. 14.6% had ≥ 2 chronic conditions, 11.7% had ≥ 1 prostate-specific antigen test, (mean 2.60 ng/ml [SD 12.3]). 113,921 patient-years were covered. Data derived from 221 general practitioners, 33.5% of GP were women, mean age was 49.4 years (SD 10.0), 67.9% used prostate-specific antigen testing. Adjusted incidence rate-ratio (95%-CI) dropped significantly over time periods: Reference Period 2: incidence rate-ratio 1.00; Period 1: incidence rate-ratio 1.74 (1.59-1.90); Period 3: incidence rate-ratio 0.61 (0.56-0.67). A higher number of chronic conditions and a patient age between 60-69 years were significantly associated with higher screening rate. Increasing numbers of PSA testing per patient, as well as increasing age, were independently and significantly associated with an increase in the PSA value. Swiss general practitioners adapted screening behavior as early as evidence of a limited health benefit evolved, while using a risk-adapted approach whenever performing multiple testing. Updated recommendations might have helped to maintain this decrease. Further recommendations and campaigns should aimed at older patients with multimorbidity, to sustain a further decline in prostate-specific antigen screening practices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31194773
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217879
pii: PONE-D-19-01886
pmc: PMC6565361
doi:
Substances chimiques
KLK3 protein, human
EC 3.4.21.-
Kallikreins
EC 3.4.21.-
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0217879Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Biostatistics. 2010 Oct;11(4):707-19
pubmed: 20530126
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):41.e23-30
pubmed: 23911680
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8
pubmed: 19297566
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):181-90
pubmed: 17625132
Cancer. 2016 Dec 15;122(24):3785-3793
pubmed: 27658175
J Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;42(9):1702-7
pubmed: 26233513
Health Policy. 2004 Apr;68(1):113-21
pubmed: 15033558
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Apr;62(597):e297-307
pubmed: 22520918
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 May;27(3):205-209
pubmed: 28221220
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):640-2
pubmed: 25706997
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74
pubmed: 25552584
Prev Med. 2017 Jan;94:31-39
pubmed: 27894911
BMJ. 2004 Oct 30;329(7473):1013
pubmed: 15514347
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jun 26;142:w13611
pubmed: 22736075
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):419-25
pubmed: 23083803
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 03;13:429
pubmed: 23641775
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9
pubmed: 19297565
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):381-6
pubmed: 15249526
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e845-51
pubmed: 26541183
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Dec 1;2(12):1657-1660
pubmed: 27541955
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 21;166(6):451-452
pubmed: 28320011
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):18-24
pubmed: 22653380
Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):85-9
pubmed: 25440819
J Urban Health. 2014 Jun;91(3):510-25
pubmed: 24474611
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Sep 10;172(16):1267-8
pubmed: 22826149
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Nov 24;13:113
pubmed: 23181753
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 1;33(22):2416-23
pubmed: 26056181
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Jun 10;15:47
pubmed: 26058350
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 10;13(7):e0200409
pubmed: 29990335
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 28;10(7):e0134134
pubmed: 26218594
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2011 Jan;20 Suppl 1:S39-41
pubmed: 21245680
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153299
pubmed: 27100402
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 May 29;145:w14140
pubmed: 26024476
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 07;14:1157
pubmed: 25377723
Rev Urol. 2015;17(3):171-7
pubmed: 26543432
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65
pubmed: 10535437
Cancer Med. 2015 Feb;4(2):212-23
pubmed: 25430885
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Jun;26(6):949-52
pubmed: 25822574
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):748-57
pubmed: 18381468
Gerontology. 2014;60(3):263-73
pubmed: 24603324
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Jan 28;140:w13142
pubmed: 21279858
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:58-74
pubmed: 28843410
Med J Aust. 2011 Mar 21;194(6):293-6
pubmed: 21426283
PLoS One. 2017 May 16;12(5):e0177687
pubmed: 28520820
Cancer Biol Med. 2014 Mar;11(1):56-63
pubmed: 24738039
J Urol. 2014 Jun;191(6):1737-42
pubmed: 24342148
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1839-41
pubmed: 25179266
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):120-34
pubmed: 22801674
CMAJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;4(4):E698-E705
pubmed: 28018884
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:83-91
pubmed: 26582208
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264
pubmed: 28139034