The development of a globally acceptable national model for occupational hygiene in Turkey: a modified Delphi study.

Industrial hygiene Modified Delphi Occupational health Occupational hygiene Policy development Professional practice

Journal

Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 06 2019
Historique:
received: 31 01 2019
accepted: 14 05 2019
entrez: 15 6 2019
pubmed: 15 6 2019
medline: 4 7 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although various organizations working in developed countries established the standards and approaches used in occupational hygiene, occupational hygiene professional interests and needs continue to develop in a global context. There is thus an urgent need for expanded occupational hygiene models. For successful field implementation, these models should be based on several sets of criteria, including those related to international standards, various national requirements, and multidisciplinary approaches. This is particularly important for countries in which no occupational hygiene model has been developed. This study thus examined the consensus on occupational hygiene standards among stakeholders in Turkey regarding the development of a national model. A modified Delphi study was conducted among key occupational health experts in Turkey who could aid in the relevant implementation, policy-making, and educational processes for such a model. Participants were selected from various governmental institutions, non-governmental organizations, trade unions, universities, and occupational health practices. The first-round findings were obtained from open-ended questions. The results revealed several requirements, including the adoption of an international hygiene definition, the official recognition of professional and practical areas in Turkish occupational hygiene, hygienist training methods, priorities, and competent institutions. Second-round findings indicated a consensus rate of over 80% regarding the need for implementation standards, training and education standards, requirements and priorities, and competent institutions for professionals working in the field of occupational hygiene. A third-round and SWOT analysis was also conducted among the group to confirm the consensus issues. The search for solutions and developmental expectations increases when awareness of internationalization and the need for common global standards increase. This developmental process may provide the basis for an appropriate model in developing countries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although various organizations working in developed countries established the standards and approaches used in occupational hygiene, occupational hygiene professional interests and needs continue to develop in a global context. There is thus an urgent need for expanded occupational hygiene models. For successful field implementation, these models should be based on several sets of criteria, including those related to international standards, various national requirements, and multidisciplinary approaches. This is particularly important for countries in which no occupational hygiene model has been developed. This study thus examined the consensus on occupational hygiene standards among stakeholders in Turkey regarding the development of a national model. A modified Delphi study was conducted among key occupational health experts in Turkey who could aid in the relevant implementation, policy-making, and educational processes for such a model. Participants were selected from various governmental institutions, non-governmental organizations, trade unions, universities, and occupational health practices.
RESULTS
The first-round findings were obtained from open-ended questions. The results revealed several requirements, including the adoption of an international hygiene definition, the official recognition of professional and practical areas in Turkish occupational hygiene, hygienist training methods, priorities, and competent institutions. Second-round findings indicated a consensus rate of over 80% regarding the need for implementation standards, training and education standards, requirements and priorities, and competent institutions for professionals working in the field of occupational hygiene. A third-round and SWOT analysis was also conducted among the group to confirm the consensus issues.
CONCLUSIONS
The search for solutions and developmental expectations increases when awareness of internationalization and the need for common global standards increase. This developmental process may provide the basis for an appropriate model in developing countries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31196092
doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0480-z
pii: 10.1186/s12992-019-0480-z
pmc: PMC6567611
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

39

Références

Occup Med (Lond). 1999 Jan;49(1):27-35
pubmed: 10451584
Ann Occup Hyg. 1999 Nov;43(8):501-3
pubmed: 10787382
J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2001 Nov;20(6):311-9
pubmed: 11840682
Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Oct;48(7):583-94
pubmed: 15388513
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 Jan;2(1):1-7
pubmed: 15764518
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005 Jan-Mar;11(1):18-22
pubmed: 15859186
Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Jun;55(4):312-8
pubmed: 15982981
Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Nov;49(8):649-59
pubmed: 16126759
Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Oct;50(7):645-9
pubmed: 16998232
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Oct;3(10):D102-9
pubmed: 16998981
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008 Mar;5(3):D43-7
pubmed: 18158648
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009 May;6(5):257-66
pubmed: 19204864
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1990 Dec;19(2):129-44
pubmed: 2130087
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(9):D172-4
pubmed: 22816609
Ind Health. 2012;50(4):261-6
pubmed: 22878267
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Mar 1;39(2):212-6
pubmed: 22903148
J Safety Res. 2012 Dec;43(5-6):339-50
pubmed: 23206506
Ann Occup Hyg. 2014 Mar;58(2):140-51
pubmed: 24375869
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Dec;65(9):722-4
pubmed: 26276757
Palliat Med. 2017 Sep;31(8):684-706
pubmed: 28190381
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Mar;24(1):160-163
pubmed: 28335689
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Jan 1;61(1):3-15
pubmed: 28395315
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Oct 10;84(3):538-540
pubmed: 30835376
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Aug 31;84(3):436-441
pubmed: 30835392

Auteurs

Sibel Kiran (S)

Hacettepe University, Institute of Public Health, Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Sihhiye-Ankara, Turkey. sibelkiran@gmail.com.

Alp Ergor (A)

Dokuz Eylul University, Department of Public Health, Izmir, Turkey.

Ceyda Sahan (C)

Dokuz Eylul University, Department of Public Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Esra Emerce (E)

Gazi University, Pharmacy Faculty, Department of Toxicology, Ankara, Turkey.

Sergio Luzzi (S)

University of Florence, National Secretary of AIDII (Italian Industrial Hygienists Association), Florence, Italy.

Yucel Demiral (Y)

Dokuz Eylul University, Department of Public Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH