[Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].
Objektive frequenzspezifische Hörschwellenbestimmung mittels schmalbandiger Chirp-Reize mit pegeladaptiver simultaner Maskierung.
Audiometry
Brainstem evoked response audiometry
Chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses
Confirmatory diagnostics
Hearing loss
Journal
HNO
ISSN: 1433-0458
Titre abrégé: HNO
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 2985099R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
15
6
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
entrez:
15
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the past, various simulation and measurement paradigms have been introduced and evaluated in order to improve frequency-specific measurement of the hearing threshold using early auditory evoked potentials (EAEP). A promising approach for improvement of detection of stimulus response is the usage of frequency-modulated chirp signals, which optimize the temporal synchrony of neuronal responses along a region of the basilar membrane. This study validated the performance of three generated narrow-band chirp stimuli in combination with a level-adaptive simultaneous masker on a collective of normally hearing subjects. In this study 25 normal hearing subjects took part after undergoing pure tone audiometry as well as an objective estimation of the auditory threshold using low, middle and high chirp stimuli. The characteristic EAEP parameters were visually identified before statistical analysis. The characteristic latency level function was conducted using measurements within a stimulus level range from 80 to 0 dB HL. Afterwards a comparison of objectively verified auditory threshold and subjective auditory threshold was conducted. All objectively determined thresholds of the frequency-specific evoked EAEP were on average below 10 dB HL: low chirp at 8.2 dB HL, middle chirp at 5.8 dB HL and high chirp at 5.4 dB HL. The mean difference compared to subjectively determined auditory thresholds at all frequencies was below 3 dB and was not significant. Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) using a band-limited and level-specific masked chirp stimulus is an efficient method for the determination of frequency-specific excitation thresholds in the clinical routine. The small, insignificant difference compared to the subjectively determined auditory thresholds makes usage of correction factors mostly redundant. Confirming the study results concerning low chirp stimuli so far, the low chirp BERA currently seems to be the method of choice for estimation of auditory threshold at low frequency ranges around 500 Hz.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the past, various simulation and measurement paradigms have been introduced and evaluated in order to improve frequency-specific measurement of the hearing threshold using early auditory evoked potentials (EAEP). A promising approach for improvement of detection of stimulus response is the usage of frequency-modulated chirp signals, which optimize the temporal synchrony of neuronal responses along a region of the basilar membrane.
AIM OF THE STUDY
OBJECTIVE
This study validated the performance of three generated narrow-band chirp stimuli in combination with a level-adaptive simultaneous masker on a collective of normally hearing subjects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
In this study 25 normal hearing subjects took part after undergoing pure tone audiometry as well as an objective estimation of the auditory threshold using low, middle and high chirp stimuli. The characteristic EAEP parameters were visually identified before statistical analysis. The characteristic latency level function was conducted using measurements within a stimulus level range from 80 to 0 dB HL. Afterwards a comparison of objectively verified auditory threshold and subjective auditory threshold was conducted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All objectively determined thresholds of the frequency-specific evoked EAEP were on average below 10 dB HL: low chirp at 8.2 dB HL, middle chirp at 5.8 dB HL and high chirp at 5.4 dB HL. The mean difference compared to subjectively determined auditory thresholds at all frequencies was below 3 dB and was not significant.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) using a band-limited and level-specific masked chirp stimulus is an efficient method for the determination of frequency-specific excitation thresholds in the clinical routine. The small, insignificant difference compared to the subjectively determined auditory thresholds makes usage of correction factors mostly redundant. Confirming the study results concerning low chirp stimuli so far, the low chirp BERA currently seems to be the method of choice for estimation of auditory threshold at low frequency ranges around 500 Hz.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31197424
doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-0676-9
pii: 10.1007/s00106-019-0676-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
843-854Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):215-23
pubmed: 20649217
HNO. 2008 Oct;56(10):1025-39
pubmed: 18836669
Int J Audiol. 2017 May;56(5):337-345
pubmed: 28599607
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):812-6
pubmed: 24630052
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;78(5):762-8
pubmed: 24613039
Audiology. 1992;31(5):272-83
pubmed: 1449430
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:192178
pubmed: 22619622
Audiology. 1990;29(2):107-12
pubmed: 2350303
Hear Res. 2014 Oct;316:65-72
pubmed: 25124151
J Otolaryngol. 1979 Aug;8(4):289-314
pubmed: 513178
Ear Hear. 1984 Mar-Apr;5(2):105-13
pubmed: 6724170
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):1896-907
pubmed: 20968361
Scand Audiol. 1983;12(2):109-15
pubmed: 6612212
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Jun;43(3):259-68
pubmed: 26526641
Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:16-20
pubmed: 17063006
Int J Audiol. 2002 Jul;41(5):271-8
pubmed: 12166686
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jun;42(4):177-219
pubmed: 12790346
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Aug;91(8):500-4
pubmed: 22135225
Audiology. 1984;23(1):59-74
pubmed: 6704060
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jan;141(1):197
pubmed: 28147572
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Nov;122(5):2772-85
pubmed: 18189568
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Mar;111(3):1318-29
pubmed: 11931309
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2213-22
pubmed: 15532653
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1530-40
pubmed: 10738807
Laryngorhinootologie. 2017 Apr;96(S 01):S4-S42
pubmed: 28499293
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Sep;96(5):420-32
pubmed: 7555916
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):235-46
pubmed: 20649219
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1985 Jul;64(7):368-74
pubmed: 2993769
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jun;87(6):2592-605
pubmed: 2373794