Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate as a 1-day surgery.
BPH
HoLEP
Holmium
Prostate
Same day surgery
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
27
12
2018
accepted:
29
05
2019
pubmed:
15
6
2019
medline:
29
1
2021
entrez:
15
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the safety and feasibility of HoLEP as a day-case procedure. We reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution between February 2017 and March 2018. During this time, we began a prospective trial aimed at same-day discharge of specific patients. Baseline and demographic variables, and past medical, past urological, intra-operative and post-operative variables in addition to disposition and readmission data were collected. Bivariate analysis was conducted to compare patients based on the day of discharge and readmission. A multivariable model using multiple-regression analysis was used to assess predictors for early discharge or readmission. There were 179 total HoLEP procedures that were performed during the study period. Forty-seven patients were suitable candidates for same-day discharge. Among this group, 28 (59.5%) patients were successfully discharged home on the same day. Nineteen patients (40.4%) could not be discharged. The most common cause of not to discharge patients was the degree of hematuria without continuous bladder irrigation. Pre-operative prostate volume was different between the two groups (88.4 ± 30.7 cc for discharged patients vs 69.0 ± 30.7 cc for admitted patients, p = 0.033). No other pre-operative differences were identified. There were five readmissions (17.8%) following same-day discharge. Readmitted patients had higher rates of history of urinary tract infection (80% vs 26.2%, p = 0.0304). On multivariable analysis, no statistically significant predictors were identified for early discharge or readmission. Same-day discharge following HoLEP is safe and feasible in well-selected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31197524
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02831-6
pii: 10.1007/s00345-019-02831-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1017-1025Références
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):483-95
pubmed: 25647204
Ann Ital Chir. 2013 Nov-Dec;84(6):661-5
pubmed: 23165318
BJU Int. 2012 Feb;109(3):408-11
pubmed: 21883820
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1972-6
pubmed: 21944127
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):969-974
pubmed: 29784507
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(3):433-7
pubmed: 20804474
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):421-4
pubmed: 19969327
J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2431-5; discussion 2435
pubmed: 18930490
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096
pubmed: 24972732
J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1347-52
pubmed: 21745115
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2007 Dec;13(12):1091-3
pubmed: 18284057
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):805-9
pubmed: 27065437
CMAJ. 2010 Apr 6;182(6):551-7
pubmed: 20194559
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):216-21
pubmed: 22591968
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1056-1061
pubmed: 28830227
Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):1020-4
pubmed: 17095078
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):197-8
pubmed: 19638901
Prog Urol. 2015 Jan;25(1):34-9
pubmed: 25453354
Can J Urol. 2016 Dec;23(6):8557-8563
pubmed: 27995851
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):118-40
pubmed: 23541338
J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):604-11
pubmed: 23167266
J Urol. 2004 May;171(5):1773-81
pubmed: 15076275
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):563-8
pubmed: 16713070
BJU Int. 2003 Jan;91(1):61-4
pubmed: 12614252
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 26;8(1):6575
pubmed: 29700356