A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors for remission in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma.


Journal

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 28 12 2018
revised: 19 04 2019
accepted: 12 06 2019
pubmed: 15 6 2019
medline: 16 10 2019
entrez: 15 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia are rare in young women but create a dilemma between desire for pregnancy and oncologic outcomes. To identify remission rates and associated prognostic factors in patients undergoing fertility-sparing management for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia. MEDLINE was searched for studies published between January 1, 1950 and July 31, 2017 using various search terms. Studies evaluating fertility-sparing management in patients aged between 19 and 44 years with atypical hyperplasia or stage I endometrial cancer. Use of PRISMA guidelines to conduct a meta-analysis of the proportion of patients in remission and meta-regression analysis to test the effect of possible prognostic factors for remission. A total of 3673 studies were screened; 65 studies including 1604 patients met the inclusion criteria. The remission rate was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.77). Operative hysteroscopy for endometrial sampling was associated with higher remission rates (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10-4.84; P=0.03). Studies with higher ratios of infertile women were associated with higher remission rates (OR 4.21; 95% CI, 1.44-12.33; P<0.01). Operative hysteroscopy is the preferred endometrial sampling method for patients with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer undergoing fertility-sparing management.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia are rare in young women but create a dilemma between desire for pregnancy and oncologic outcomes.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To identify remission rates and associated prognostic factors in patients undergoing fertility-sparing management for endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia.
SEARCH STRATEGY METHODS
MEDLINE was searched for studies published between January 1, 1950 and July 31, 2017 using various search terms.
SELECTION CRITERIA METHODS
Studies evaluating fertility-sparing management in patients aged between 19 and 44 years with atypical hyperplasia or stage I endometrial cancer.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
Use of PRISMA guidelines to conduct a meta-analysis of the proportion of patients in remission and meta-regression analysis to test the effect of possible prognostic factors for remission.
MAIN RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 3673 studies were screened; 65 studies including 1604 patients met the inclusion criteria. The remission rate was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.77). Operative hysteroscopy for endometrial sampling was associated with higher remission rates (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.10-4.84; P=0.03). Studies with higher ratios of infertile women were associated with higher remission rates (OR 4.21; 95% CI, 1.44-12.33; P<0.01).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Operative hysteroscopy is the preferred endometrial sampling method for patients with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer undergoing fertility-sparing management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31197826
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12882
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

277-288

Informations de copyright

© 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Auteurs

Sarah Guillon (S)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.

Nathalie Popescu (N)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.

Juliette Phelippeau (J)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.

Martin Koskas (M)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Bichat University Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH