Microvascular invasion is a major prognostic factor after pancreatico-duodenectomy for adenocarcinoma.
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal
/ blood supply
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Deoxycytidine
/ analogs & derivatives
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Irinotecan
/ administration & dosage
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Male
Microvessels
Neovascularization, Pathologic
/ pathology
Oxaliplatin
/ administration & dosage
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ blood supply
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Gemcitabine
ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma
long-term outcomes
microvascular invasion
pancreatico-duodenectomy
prognostic factor
Journal
Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
23
01
2019
revised:
03
04
2019
accepted:
18
05
2019
pubmed:
15
6
2019
medline:
20
8
2019
entrez:
15
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microvascular invasion (MVI) has been proved to be poor prognostic factor in many cancers. To date, only one study published highlights the relationship between this factor and the natural history of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of MVI, on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), after pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Secondarily, we aim to demonstrate that MVI is the most important factor to predict OS after surgery compared with resection margin (RM) and lymph node (LN) status. Between January 2015 and December 2017, 158 PD were performed in two hepato-bilio-pancreatic (HBP) centers. Among these, only 79 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study. Clinical-pathological data and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Of the 79 patients in the cohort, MVI was identified in 35 (44.3%). In univariate analysis, MVI (P = .012 and P < .0001), RM (P = .023 and P = .021), and LN status (P < .0001 and P = .0001) were significantly associated with DFS and OS. A less than 1 mm margin clearance did not influence relapse (P = .72) or long-term survival (P = .48). LN ratio > 0.226 had a negative impact on OS (P = .044). In multivariate analysis, MVI and RM persisted as independent prognostic factors of DFS (P = .0075 and P = .0098, respectively) and OS (P < .0001 and P = .0194, respectively). Using the likelihood ratio test, MVI was identified as the best fit to predict OS after PD for ductal adenocarcinomas compared with the margin status model (R0 vs R1) (P = .0014). The MVI represents another major prognostic factor determining long-term outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Microvascular invasion (MVI) has been proved to be poor prognostic factor in many cancers. To date, only one study published highlights the relationship between this factor and the natural history of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of MVI, on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), after pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Secondarily, we aim to demonstrate that MVI is the most important factor to predict OS after surgery compared with resection margin (RM) and lymph node (LN) status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Between January 2015 and December 2017, 158 PD were performed in two hepato-bilio-pancreatic (HBP) centers. Among these, only 79 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study. Clinical-pathological data and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 79 patients in the cohort, MVI was identified in 35 (44.3%). In univariate analysis, MVI (P = .012 and P < .0001), RM (P = .023 and P = .021), and LN status (P < .0001 and P = .0001) were significantly associated with DFS and OS. A less than 1 mm margin clearance did not influence relapse (P = .72) or long-term survival (P = .48). LN ratio > 0.226 had a negative impact on OS (P = .044). In multivariate analysis, MVI and RM persisted as independent prognostic factors of DFS (P = .0075 and P = .0098, respectively) and OS (P < .0001 and P = .0194, respectively). Using the likelihood ratio test, MVI was identified as the best fit to predict OS after PD for ductal adenocarcinomas compared with the margin status model (R0 vs R1) (P = .0014).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The MVI represents another major prognostic factor determining long-term outcomes.
Substances chimiques
folfirinox
0
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Irinotecan
7673326042
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Gemcitabine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
483-493Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.