Outcome measurement instruments for erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis: Systematic review.
core outcome set
dermatology
erythema
incontinence-associated dermatitis
irritant contact dermatitis
literature review
measurement properties
nursing
outcome measurement instruments
systematic review
Journal
Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
19
12
2018
revised:
21
03
2019
accepted:
02
04
2019
pubmed:
15
6
2019
medline:
1
8
2020
entrez:
15
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To: (a) examine which outcome measurement instruments for erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) with supporting evidence about measurement properties are available; (b) evaluate the methodological quality of the studies and the quality of the measurement properties; and (c) identify eligible instruments to measure erythema in incontinence-associated dermatitis research. Systematic review. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL were systematically searched until July 2018 (update December 2018). Additional input was gathered from 151 incontinence-associated dermatitis experts. Cited and citing references of included studies were screened. The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Reported measurement properties were rated against criteria for good measurement properties. Fourteen studies, describing 10 measurement instruments, were included. In five instruments, erythema was captured as a separate concept, two studies provided empirical evidence about the measurement properties. The most studied measurement properties were reliability (9 studies), measurement error (4 studies) and criterion validity (4 studies). In one study, internal consistency was examined. No instrument measuring exclusively erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis exists. There is no single composite incontinence-associated dermatitis measurement instrument that outperforms others. Development or adaption of an instrument to measure erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis is one option to solve this challenge. The evidence about measurement properties of instruments measuring erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis has not been summarized to date. The lack of an instrument should trigger activities to measure this domain accurately in future clinical trials. 目的: 在于:(a)检查与失禁性皮炎(简称为IAD)类红斑结果测量仪器以及测量属性有力证据的可用性;(b)评估研究的方法学质量和测量属性的质量;和(c)在失禁性皮炎研究中确定测量红斑的合格仪器。 设计: 系统综述。 资料来源: 在2018年7月(2018年12月更新)之前,系统性地搜索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和CENTRAL。从151名失禁性皮炎专家那里收集了其他信息。筛选了纳入研究的以往引用文献和现有引用文献。 综述方法: 使用了COSMIN 偏倚风险检查清单来评估研究的方法学质量。根据良好测量属性准则评级了报告的测量属性。 结果: 纳入了14项描述10种测量仪器的研究。在五种仪器中,捕获了作为单独理念的红斑,两项研究提供了关于测量属性的实验性证据。投入大多数研究的测量属性是信度(9项研究)、测量误差(4项研究)和标准效度(4项研究)。在一项研究中,检查了内部一致性。 结论: 不存在专门用来测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器。没有单一的复合失禁性皮炎测量仪器比其他仪器还要好。开发或改造测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器是解决这一挑战的选择之一。 影响: 迄今为止,尚未总结关于测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器测量属性的证据。在未来的临床试验中,如果缺少一种仪器,则会开始准确测量该领域。.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(chi)
目的: 在于:(a)检查与失禁性皮炎(简称为IAD)类红斑结果测量仪器以及测量属性有力证据的可用性;(b)评估研究的方法学质量和测量属性的质量;和(c)在失禁性皮炎研究中确定测量红斑的合格仪器。 设计: 系统综述。 资料来源: 在2018年7月(2018年12月更新)之前,系统性地搜索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和CENTRAL。从151名失禁性皮炎专家那里收集了其他信息。筛选了纳入研究的以往引用文献和现有引用文献。 综述方法: 使用了COSMIN 偏倚风险检查清单来评估研究的方法学质量。根据良好测量属性准则评级了报告的测量属性。 结果: 纳入了14项描述10种测量仪器的研究。在五种仪器中,捕获了作为单独理念的红斑,两项研究提供了关于测量属性的实验性证据。投入大多数研究的测量属性是信度(9项研究)、测量误差(4项研究)和标准效度(4项研究)。在一项研究中,检查了内部一致性。 结论: 不存在专门用来测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器。没有单一的复合失禁性皮炎测量仪器比其他仪器还要好。开发或改造测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器是解决这一挑战的选择之一。 影响: 迄今为止,尚未总结关于测量失禁性皮炎类红斑的仪器测量属性的证据。在未来的临床试验中,如果缺少一种仪器,则会开始准确测量该领域。.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2393-2417Subventions
Organisme : Ghent University
Informations de copyright
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Beeckman, D., Van Damme, N., Schoonhoven, L., Van Lancker, A., Kottner, J., Beele, H., … Verhaeghe, S. (2016). Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults. Cochrane Database Systematic Review, 11, Cd011627. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011627.pub2
Beeckman, D., Van den Bussche, K., Alves, P., Arnold Long, M. C., Beele, H., Ciprandi, G., … Kottner, J. (2018). Towards an international language for incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): Design and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Ghent Global IAD Categorization Tool (GLOBIAD) in 30 countries. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(6), 1331-1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16327
Beeckman, D., Van Lancker, A., Van Hecke, A., & Verhaeghe, S. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis of incontinence-associated dermatitis, incontinence and moisture as risk factors for pressure ulcer development. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(3), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21593
Bliss, D. Z., Gurvich, O. V., Hurlow, J., Cefalu, J. E., Gannon, A., Wilhems, A., … Trammel, S. H. (2018). Evaluation of validity and reliability of a revised incontinence-associated skin damage severity instrument (IASD. D. 2) by 3 groups of nursing staff. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 45(5), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000466
Bliss, D. Z., Hurlow, J., Cefalu, J., Mahlum, L., Borchert, K., & Savik, K. (2014). Refinement of an instrument for assessing incontinent-associated dermatitis and its severity for use with darker-toned skin. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 41(4), 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000034
Borchert, K., Bliss, D. Z., Savik, K., & Radosevich, D. M. (2010). The incontinence-associated dermatitis and its severity instrument: Development and validation. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 37(5), 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181edac3e
Brandão, A. C. M. A. G., Gambin, C. C., Majado, C. A., Kunitake, N., Alexandre, N. M. C., & Dantas, S. R. P. E. (2018). Adaptation of “Perineal Assessment Tool” for Brazilian culture. Revista Estima, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.30886/estima.v16.397
Braunschmidt, B., Muller, G., Jukic-Puntigam, M., & Steininger, A. (2013). The inter-rater reliability of the incontinence-associated dermatitis intervention tool-D (IADIT-D) between two independent registered nurses of nursing home residents in long-term care facilities. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 21(2), 284-295. 0.1891/1061-3749.21.2.284
Brettle, A. J., Long, A. F., Grant, M. J., & Greenhalgh, J. (1998). Searching for information on outcomes: Do you need to be comprehensive? BMJ Quality & Safety, 7(3), 163-167. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.7.3.163
Brown, D. (1993). Perineal dermatitis: Can we measure it? Ostomy/Wound Management, 39(7), 28-30, 31.
Brown, W. M. (2006). A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of two marketed zinc oxidebaseddiaper rash ointments in children with diaper dermatitis. Clinical Dermatology Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
Buckley, B. S., Mantaring, J. B., Dofitas, R. B., Lapitan, M. C., & Monteagudo, A. (2016). A new scale for assessing the severity of uncomplicated diaper dermatitis in infants: Development and validation. Pediatric Dermatology, 33(6), 632-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12988
Clarke-O'Neill, S., Farbrot, A., Lagerstedt, M.-L., Cottenden, A., & Fader, M. (2015). Is it Feasible to Use Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis Assessment Tools in Routine Clinical Practice in the Long-term Care Setting? Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 42(4), 379-388.
Coyer, F., & Campbell, J. (2018). Incontinence-associated dermatitis in the critically ill patient: An intensive care perspective. Nursing in Critical Care, 23(4), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12331
De Meyer, D., Gabriel, S., Kottner, J., & Beeckman, D. (2018). Outcome measurement instruments for erythema associated with incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): systematic review. PROSPERO CRD42018104396. Retrieved from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018104396
Demarre, L., Verhaeghe, S., Van Hecke, A., Clays, E., Grypdonck, M., & Beeckman, D. (2015). Factors predicting the development of pressure ulcers in an at-risk population who receive standardized preventive care: Secondary analyses of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12497
Dorland, W. A. N. (2011). Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary32: Dorland's illustrated medical dictionary. Elsevier Health Sciences.
García Hernández, M. N., García Moreno, V., Mahtani Chugani, V., & García Andrés, M. C. (2017). Construcción de un instrumento de valoración del riesgo y gravedad de las lesiones del área del pañal en lactantes RDIC-lac. Revista Rol De Enfermería, 40(4), 20-31.
Garcia Molina, P. (2018). Diaper dermatitis scale_Spanish. Unpublished work.
Gray, M., Beeckman, D., Bliss, D. Z., Fader, M., Logan, S., Junkin, J., … Kurz, P. (2012). Incontinence-associated dermatitis: A comprehensive review and update. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 39(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e31823fe246
Gray, M., Bliss, D. Z., Doughty, D. B., Ermer-Seltun, J., Kennedy-Evans, K. L., & Palmer, M. H. (2007). Incontinence-associated Dermatitis: A Consensus. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 34(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00152192-200701000-00008
Gray, M., & Giuliano, K. (2017). Incontinence-associated dermatitis and immobility as pressure injury risk factors: A multisite epidemiologic analysis. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000390
Jukic-Puntigam, M., Steininger, A., Urban, W., & Müller, G. (2011). The inter-rater reliability of the German version of the Perineal Assessment Tool (PAT-D). A tool for nurses to assess the risk of Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD). Pflegewissenschaft, 13(11), 590-596. https://doi.org/10.3936/1115
Junkin, J., & Selekof, J. L. (2008). Beyond “diaper rash”: Incontinence-associated dermatitis Does it have you seeing RED? Nursing, 38(11), 56hn51-56hn10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000341725.55531.e2
Kennedy, K., & Lutz, L. (1996). Comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of three skin protectants in the management of incontinent dermatitis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Advances in Wound Management
Kottner, J., Audige, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajewski, B. J., Hróbjartsson, A., … Streiner, D. L. (2011). Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(6), 661-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.01.016
Kottner, J., & Beeckman, D. (2017). Core Outcome Sets (cos) for clinical trials in health-and nursing science: The case of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (iad). Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(10), 2268-2269. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13144
Kottner, J., Jacobi, L., Hahnel, E., Alam, M., Balzer, K., Beeckman, D., … Schmitt, J. (2018). Core outcome sets in dermatology: Report from the second meeting of the International Cochrane Skin Group Core Outcome Set Initiative. British Journal of Dermatology, 178(4), e279-e285. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16324
Mokkink, L. B., De Vet, H. C., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Bouter, L. M., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 20(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
Nix, D. H. (2002). Validity and reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool. Ostomy Wound Manage, 48(2), 43-46, 48-49.
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Prinsen, C., Mokkink, L., Bouter, L., Alonso, J., Patrick, D., de Vet, H., & Terwee, C. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Prinsen, C. A. C., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., … Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set”-a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 449. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
Steininger, A. (2012). As Delphi-study to validate the German incontinence associated dermatitis intervention tool (IADIT-D). Pflegewissenschaft, 14(2), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.3936/1135
Steininger, A., Jukic-Puntigam, M., Urban, W., & Müller, G. (2011). Übersetzung, Anpassung und Prüfung der Inhaltsvalidität des Instruments" Perineales Assessment Tool"(PAT). ProCare, 16(4), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00735-011-0472-6
Streiner, D. L., & Kottner, J. (2014). Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(9), 1970-1979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12402
Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9528-5
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C., Chiarotto, A., de Vet, H., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Mokkink, L. B.(2018). COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs-user manual. Retrieved December 18, 2018, from https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf
Tunis, S. R., Clarke, M., Gorst, S. L., Gargon, E., Blazeby, J. M., Altman, D. G., & Williamson, P. R. (2016). Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 5(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2015-0007
Van den Bussche, K., De Meyer, D., Van Damme, N., Kottner, J., & Beeckman, D. (2017). CONSIDER - Core Outcome Set in IAD Research: Study protocol for establishing a core set of outcomes and measurements in incontinence-associated dermatitis research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(10), 2473-2483. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13165
Van den Bussche, K., Kottner, J., Beele, H., De Meyer, D., Dunk, A. M., Ersser, S., … Beeckman, D. (2018). Core outcome domains in incontinence-associated dermatitis research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1605-1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13562
Van den Bussche, K., Verhaeghe, S., Van Hecke, A., & Beeckman, D. (2018). The Ghent Global IAD Monitoring Tool (GLOBIAD-M) to monitor the healing of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD): Design and reliability study. International Wound Journal, 15(4), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12898
Williamson, P. R., Altman, D. G., Bagley, H., Barnes, K. L., Blazeby, J. M., Brookes, S. T., … Young, B. (2017). The COMET handbook: Version 1.0. Trials, 18(3), 280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4
Williamson, P. R., Altman, D. G., Blazeby, J. M., Clarke, M., Devane, D., Gargon, E., & Tugwell, P. (2012). Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials, 13(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132