Acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: protocol of a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Acceptance and commitment therapy
Chronic pain
Individual participant data meta-analysis
Subgroups
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 06 2019
14 06 2019
Historique:
received:
14
01
2019
accepted:
13
05
2019
entrez:
16
6
2019
pubmed:
16
6
2019
medline:
28
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) can be effective in treating chronic pain. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of ACT, uncertainties remain regarding which subgroups in the chronic pain population are likely to benefit most and least. This protocol describes the application for two meta-analytic approaches, one at the level of individual participant data and the other at the level of aggregated data, from randomized controlled trials of ACT for chronic pain (ACT-CP-MA). We will systematically conduct literature searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and trial registers. Two reviewers will independently select studies for inclusion and data extraction. ACT-CP-MA will include randomized controlled trials with ACT for chronic pain compared to control conditions for adults (≥ 18 years) with chronic pain (> 3 months). We will invite the authors of all eligible trials to share individual participant data. Outcomes will include standardized measures of pain interference, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, participants' rating of overall improvement, and ACT-related process variables. Using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and GRADE, reviewers will independently check for risk of bias, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendations. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, we will use a one-step approach where participants are clustered with studies and data from all studies are modeled simultaneously. For analyses, we will use mixed-effects models. Additionally, we will employ a meta-analysis with aggregate data and compare the results of both meta-analyses. This collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized controlled trials of ACT for chronic pain versus control conditions will demonstrate how the known benefits of ACT for chronic pain vary across different subtypes of the chronic pain population. The results of the meta-analyses will be based on a comprehensive search of multiple databases and will help to inform future clinical trials and decision-making on the use of ACT in chronic pain and improve the quality, design, and reporting of future trials in this field. PROSPERO CRD42019120901.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) can be effective in treating chronic pain. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of ACT, uncertainties remain regarding which subgroups in the chronic pain population are likely to benefit most and least. This protocol describes the application for two meta-analytic approaches, one at the level of individual participant data and the other at the level of aggregated data, from randomized controlled trials of ACT for chronic pain (ACT-CP-MA).
METHODS
We will systematically conduct literature searches in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and trial registers. Two reviewers will independently select studies for inclusion and data extraction. ACT-CP-MA will include randomized controlled trials with ACT for chronic pain compared to control conditions for adults (≥ 18 years) with chronic pain (> 3 months). We will invite the authors of all eligible trials to share individual participant data. Outcomes will include standardized measures of pain interference, pain intensity, depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life, participants' rating of overall improvement, and ACT-related process variables. Using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and GRADE, reviewers will independently check for risk of bias, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendations. In the individual participant data meta-analysis, we will use a one-step approach where participants are clustered with studies and data from all studies are modeled simultaneously. For analyses, we will use mixed-effects models. Additionally, we will employ a meta-analysis with aggregate data and compare the results of both meta-analyses.
DISCUSSION
This collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized controlled trials of ACT for chronic pain versus control conditions will demonstrate how the known benefits of ACT for chronic pain vary across different subtypes of the chronic pain population. The results of the meta-analyses will be based on a comprehensive search of multiple databases and will help to inform future clinical trials and decision-making on the use of ACT in chronic pain and improve the quality, design, and reporting of future trials in this field.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019120901.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31200768
doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1044-2
pii: 10.1186/s13643-019-1044-2
pmc: PMC6570828
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
140Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PDF-2015-08-059
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(1):5-31
pubmed: 26818413
J Pain. 2017 Feb;18(2):200-211
pubmed: 27838498
Behav Res Ther. 2013 Jun;51(6):307-15
pubmed: 23548250
J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1398-406
pubmed: 24035351
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Oct;75(10):1082-6
pubmed: 7944912
JAMA. 1998 Jul 8;280(2):147-51
pubmed: 9669787
J Behav Med. 2015 Feb;38(1):66-80
pubmed: 24923259
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88
pubmed: 22035996
Pain. 1986 Mar;24(3):343-353
pubmed: 3960575
J Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr 6;49(4):354-361
pubmed: 28352937
Clin J Pain. 2010 Jun;26(5):393-402
pubmed: 20473046
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
J Psychosom Res. 1984;28(6):441-8
pubmed: 6520800
Eur J Pain. 2010 Nov;14(10):1059.e1-1059.e11
pubmed: 20538493
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):581-624
pubmed: 17592957
BMJ. 2012 Jan 03;344:d7762
pubmed: 22214758
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Oct 13;114(41):681-688
pubmed: 29082858
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 25;8(1):
pubmed: 30585216
Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-55; discussion 69-72
pubmed: 15599131
Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):663-672
pubmed: 29320375
Eur J Pain. 2015 May;19(5):677-85
pubmed: 25181605
Pain. 2003 Dec;106(3):337-345
pubmed: 14659516
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19
pubmed: 15621359
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2226-35
pubmed: 21704872
Pain. 2016 Apr;157(4):791-796
pubmed: 26670465
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;174(3):683-7
pubmed: 24804902
J Contemp Psychother. 2016;46:139-148
pubmed: 27397934
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 24;13:1229
pubmed: 24365383
Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:6916915
pubmed: 28326196
Pain. 2008 Nov 30;140(2):284-291
pubmed: 18824301
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):30-8
pubmed: 26135404
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21
pubmed: 18055266
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
J Affect Disord. 2004 Jul;81(1):61-6
pubmed: 15183601
Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):28-37
pubmed: 30586068
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858
pubmed: 30496104
Clin J Pain. 2014 Oct;30(10):894-901
pubmed: 24300218
Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):209-17
pubmed: 16279144
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(6):550-5
pubmed: 21317771
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46042
pubmed: 23056232
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Pain. 2007 Feb;127(3):276-286
pubmed: 17071000
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:141-68
pubmed: 21219193
Physiotherapy. 2015 Sep;101(3):243-51
pubmed: 25769189
J Pain. 2017 Oct;18(10):1153-1164
pubmed: 28455249
Clin J Pain. 2017 Jun;33(6):552-568
pubmed: 27479642
Pain. 1985 Dec;23(4):345-356
pubmed: 4088697
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;26(4):310-25
pubmed: 23216170
Patient. 2014;7(1):85-96
pubmed: 24271592
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;23(1):21-9
pubmed: 26041582
Clin J Pain. 2015 Nov;31(11):1004-16
pubmed: 25585272
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38
pubmed: 8080219
Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2658-78
pubmed: 24614254
J Pain. 2013 Aug;14(8):828-35
pubmed: 23651881
Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74
pubmed: 18388841
Behav Ther. 2016 Nov;47(6):869-885
pubmed: 27993338
Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):693-702
pubmed: 24378880
J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 02;11:2145-2159
pubmed: 30323649
Eur J Pain. 2009 Aug;13(7):760-8
pubmed: 18926744
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25
pubmed: 16300724
Headache. 2012 Jul-Aug;52(7):1106-19
pubmed: 22712503
Pain. 2016 Nov;157(11):2393-2394
pubmed: 27548048
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:50-9
pubmed: 26409158
Pain Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):264-77
pubmed: 26304771
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Apr 10;7:115-24
pubmed: 24748826
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65
pubmed: 25919529
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 11;14:133
pubmed: 23577981
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
BMJ. 2010 Feb 05;340:c221
pubmed: 20139215
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Apr;50(2):285-96
pubmed: 26608280
BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):1007-10
pubmed: 7950694
Eur J Pain. 2018 Apr 28;:
pubmed: 29704880
Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2792-2801
pubmed: 21995881
Eur J Pain. 2011 Sep;15(8):775.e1-11
pubmed: 21354838
J Pain. 2017 Jun;18(6):664-672
pubmed: 28131700
Eur J Pain. 2013 Apr;17(4):599-611
pubmed: 23090719
J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):101-13
pubmed: 24373572
Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):1-8
pubmed: 15599126
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jun 16;16:147
pubmed: 26076755
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 13;2:75
pubmed: 24034173
Pain. 2011 Sep;152(9):2098-2107
pubmed: 21683527
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15):1739-45
pubmed: 12897502
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1211-9
pubmed: 17907147
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94
pubmed: 21195583
Clin J Pain. 2011 Oct;27(8):716-23
pubmed: 21540740
Behav Ther. 2014 May;45(3):390-401
pubmed: 24680233
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2564-73
pubmed: 12435995
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15
pubmed: 21247734