Follow-up MRI in multiple sclerosis patients: automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces reading time.
Brain
Disease progression
Image processing, computer-assisted
Magnetic resonance imaging
Multiple sclerosis
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
16
02
2019
accepted:
13
05
2019
revised:
18
04
2019
pubmed:
16
6
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
16
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the heterogeneous and numerous appearances of lesions may impair diagnostic accuracy. This study investigates if a combined automated co-registration and lesion color-coding method (AC) improves assessment of MS follow-up MRI compared with conventional reading (CR). We retrospectively assessed 70 follow-up MRI of 53 patients. Heterogeneous datasets of diverse scanners and institutions were used. Two readers determined presence of (a) progression, (b) regression, (c) mixed change, or (d) stable disease between the two examinations using corresponding FLAIR sequences in CR and AC-assisted reading. Consensus reference reading was provided by two blinded radiologists. Kappa statistics tested interrater agreement, McNemar's test dichotomous variables, and Wilcoxon's test continuous variables (statistical significance p ≤ 0.05). The cohort comprised 41 female and 12 male patients with a mean age of 40 (± 14) years. Average rating time was reduced from 78 (± 36) to 44 (±22) s with the AC approach (p < 0.001). The time needed to start and match datasets with AC was 14 (± 1) s. Compared with CR, AC improved interrater agreement, both between raters (0.52 vs. 0.67) and between raters and consensus reference reading (0.47/0.5 vs. 0.83/0.78). Compared with CR, the diagnostic accuracy increased from 67 to 90% (reader 1, p < 0.01) and from 70 to 87% (reader 2, p < 0.05) in the AC-assisted reading. Compared with CR, automated co-registration and lesion color-coding of MS-associated FLAIR-lesions in follow-up MRI increased diagnostic accuracy and reduced the time required for follow-up evaluation significantly. The AC algorithm therefore appears to be helpful to improve MS follow-up assessments in clinical routine. • Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding increases diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis. • Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding reduces reading time of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis. • Automated co-registration and lesion color-coding improved interrater agreement in the assessment of MRI follow-up examinations in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31201526
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06273-x
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06273-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7047-7054Références
J Autoimmun. 2014 Feb-Mar;48-49:134-42
pubmed: 24524923
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 May 16;8:367-75
pubmed: 26106562
Acta Radiol. 2015 May;56(5):622-7
pubmed: 24867222
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):830-833
pubmed: 29519791
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):162-173
pubmed: 29275977
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jul;38(7):1323-1327
pubmed: 28473341
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):1465-71
pubmed: 26089318
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):68-73
pubmed: 22766673
Med Image Anal. 2013 Jan;17(1):1-18
pubmed: 23084503
Cancer Imaging. 2005 Aug 23;5:17-9
pubmed: 16154813
Neuroradiology. 2014 May;56(5):363-74
pubmed: 24590302
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):664-9
pubmed: 25972250
Neurology. 2016 Mar 15;86(11):1014-21
pubmed: 26888980
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Oct;37(10):1816-1823
pubmed: 27282863
J Neuroimaging. 2016 Jul;26(4):395-402
pubmed: 27019077
Neuroradiology. 2015 Oct;57(10):1031-43
pubmed: 26227167
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013 Aug;19(4 Multiple Sclerosis):922-43
pubmed: 23917094
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 20;17:607-615
pubmed: 29234597
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(6):1543-9
pubmed: 24987754
Neurol Clin. 2011 May;29(2):207-17
pubmed: 21439437
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):923-927
pubmed: 28364006
J Neurol. 2002 Jun;249(6):767-73
pubmed: 12111312
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):124-132
pubmed: 29943184
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1692-1700
pubmed: 29134354
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;82(10):1132-41
pubmed: 21478203
Neuroradiol J. 2012 Mar;25(1):17-21
pubmed: 24028871
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):1226-1232
pubmed: 29880479