Safety and efficacy of intracranial aneurysm embolization using the "combined remodeling technique": low-profile stents delivered through double lumen balloons: a multicenter experience.
Double-lumen balloon
Intracranial aneurysm
Low-profile stent
Journal
Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
03
11
2018
accepted:
04
06
2019
pubmed:
17
6
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
17
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since appearance of the balloon-remodeling technique and stent-assisted coiling, complex aneurysms have been treated successfully by endovascular means worldwide. Although these two techniques have been widely proven, the combination of both traditionally made the procedures more complicated technically. The aim of our study was to determine the technical success, safety, and efficacy of the low-profile stents delivered through double lumen balloons. Clinical, procedural, and angiographic data were analyzed. Eighty-four patients (55 women; age range 20-81 years) harboring 86 aneurysms were included in this study. Aneurysm maximal diameter ranged from 2 to 26 mm, with mean 7.5 mm. There were 62 unruptured, 15 recanalized, and 9 acutely ruptured aneurysms. Aneurysm locations were ACoA (31), MCA (36), supraclinoid ICA (4), carotid bifurcation (2), basilar (7), PCA (3), PICA (2), and VA (1). Ninety-three devices were implanted (63 LVIS jr, 15 LEO Baby, 14 ACCLINO Flex and 1 Neuroform Atlas) through the double lumen balloons (Scepter C or XC and Eclipse 2 L). We found 2 minor clinical events (2.4%) and 1 major event (1.2%). Total intra-procedural technical complication rate was 11.6%. Follow-up was available for 71 patients with an average follow-up of 7 months. Complete and near complete occlusion was 90.1%. Residual aneurysms were seen in 9.9%. The "combined remodeling technique" with low-profile stents delivered through double-lumen balloons is technically feasible, safe, and effective for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. This technique allows the operator to avoid extra maneuvers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31203413
doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02240-x
pii: 10.1007/s00234-019-02240-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1067-1072Références
Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3):460-8; discussion 468-9
pubmed: 17881956
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Oct;29(9):1777-81
pubmed: 18719039
J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan;110(1):35-9
pubmed: 18976057
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 May;30(5):1028-34
pubmed: 19193745
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):e523-9
pubmed: 19520984
Stroke. 2010 Jan;41(1):110-5
pubmed: 19959540
Interv Neuroradiol. 1997 Mar 30;3(1):21-35
pubmed: 20678369
Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):546-53
pubmed: 21131582
Interv Neuroradiol. 2011 Mar;17(1):27-35
pubmed: 21561556
J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov;5 Suppl 3:iii79-iii82
pubmed: 23172541
J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;40(1):50-3
pubmed: 23419713
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):1987-92
pubmed: 23639562
Front Neurol. 2014 Apr 08;5:41
pubmed: 24782817
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jan;8(1):52-7
pubmed: 25428449
Neurosurgery. 2015 Apr;76(4):441-5; discussion 445
pubmed: 25621980
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1934-41
pubmed: 26021624
J Neurol Sci. 2016 May 15;364:160-6
pubmed: 27084238
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Aug;158(8):1545-53
pubmed: 27250849
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Sep;9(9):849-853
pubmed: 27543629
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 May;10(5):446-450
pubmed: 28821627
Interv Neurol. 2017 Oct;6(3-4):170-182
pubmed: 29118794
Interv Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;24(3):263-269
pubmed: 29350091