In vitro osteodifferentiation of intact human amniotic membrane is not beneficial in the context of bone repair.
Amnion
/ metabolism
Bone Regeneration
Bone Transplantation
/ methods
Bone and Bones
/ pathology
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell Differentiation
Epithelial Cells
/ cytology
Humans
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
/ cytology
Orthopedics
Osteoblasts
/ cytology
Osteocytes
/ cytology
Osteogenesis
Phenotype
Regenerative Medicine
Tissue Banks
Tissue Engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
/ chemistry
Bone
Epithelial cells
Hydroxyapatite
Mineralization
Osteogenic potential
Tissue culture
Journal
Cell and tissue banking
ISSN: 1573-6814
Titre abrégé: Cell Tissue Bank
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100965121
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
21
03
2019
accepted:
14
06
2019
pubmed:
19
6
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
19
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The human amniotic membrane (hAM) is an attractive biomaterial for regenerative medicine, as it contains amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSC), epithelial cells (hAEC) and growth factors. We examined the potential use of hAM in orthopaedic and maxillofacial bone surgery, integrating the requirements of current regulations regarding advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) in the European Union. Previous studies have described the potential osteodifferentiation of intact hAM during whole-tissue culture in osteogenic conditions. The present study aims to determine whether in vitro osteodifferentiation of hAM is needed in the context bone repair, and the influence of this process on tissue structure, cell phenotype and cell function. Different conditions (fresh or cultured hAM; intact or hAM-derived cells) were tested. Phenotypic and functional analyses were performed with standard approaches (cell culture and staining, histological and immunolabelling) as well as original approaches (tissue staining, energy dispersive X-ray and X-ray diffraction). In our study, non-osteodifferentiated hAM (i.e., fresh or native hAM) exhibited innate pre-osteoblastic potential. Osteodifferentiation of fresh hAM induced a change in tissue structure, cell phenotype and function. Therefore, we hypothesize that pre-osteodifferentiation may not be necessary, especially if it induces unwanted changes. To our surprise, in these osteogenic conditions, hAEC had a mesenchymal phenotype with osteocyte function, and even native synthesis of hydroxyapatite, focusing osteogenic potential mainly in this epithelial layer. In conclusion, in vitro osteodifferentiation by tissue culture does not appear to be necessary for hAM to be used as an innovative ATMP for bone repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31209623
doi: 10.1007/s10561-019-09778-3
pii: 10.1007/s10561-019-09778-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
435-446Subventions
Organisme : Région of Franche-Comté, France
ID : N°2013 C-5501
Organisme : Foundation of Transplantation (FDTSFV), Saint Apollinaire, France
ID : CHU-CIC/FT 2010