Does community engaged Carnegie status matter for county health rankings in the United States?


Journal

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1741-3850
Titre abrégé: J Public Health (Oxf)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101188638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 04 2021
Historique:
received: 05 12 2018
revised: 23 04 2019
accepted: 21 05 2019
pubmed: 19 6 2019
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 19 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Community engagement is commonly used to address social inequities. The Carnegie Foundation offers an optional designation for which U.S. colleges and universities may apply to facilitate better educational outcomes through the institutionalization of community engagement. This study is the first to examine the relationship between Carnegie community engaged status and community health outcomes. Ordinal logistic regression was conducted to investigate the association between the presence of a community engaged institution and county health outcomes, including health behaviors, clinical care relating to access and quality, social and economic factors, and physical environment from the 2016 Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings and 2015 New England Resource Center for Higher Education Community engaged list. We examined 820 U.S. counties containing a university or college, 240 of which had a community engaged designation. Findings indicated that the presence of a community-engaged institution was positively associated with Clinical Care (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.64). Other county health factors were not similarly associated. Our findings suggest that community engagement status may be most relevant for achieving better access and quality of clinical care. More research is needed to explore this association in the U.S. and internationally.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Community engagement is commonly used to address social inequities. The Carnegie Foundation offers an optional designation for which U.S. colleges and universities may apply to facilitate better educational outcomes through the institutionalization of community engagement. This study is the first to examine the relationship between Carnegie community engaged status and community health outcomes.
METHODS
Ordinal logistic regression was conducted to investigate the association between the presence of a community engaged institution and county health outcomes, including health behaviors, clinical care relating to access and quality, social and economic factors, and physical environment from the 2016 Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings and 2015 New England Resource Center for Higher Education Community engaged list. We examined 820 U.S. counties containing a university or college, 240 of which had a community engaged designation.
RESULTS
Findings indicated that the presence of a community-engaged institution was positively associated with Clinical Care (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.09, 3.64). Other county health factors were not similarly associated.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that community engagement status may be most relevant for achieving better access and quality of clinical care. More research is needed to explore this association in the U.S. and internationally.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31211380
pii: 5520067
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz066
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

164-171

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Emma Apatu (E)

Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, USA.

Sericea Stallings-Smith (S)

Department of Public Health, Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Elizabeth Alvarez (E)

Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, USA.

Laura Anderson (L)

Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, USA.

Aaron Spaulding (A)

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern, Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH