Honeybees use absolute rather than relative numerosity in number discrimination.

honeybees insect cognition number discrimination numerical rule numerosity

Journal

Biology letters
ISSN: 1744-957X
Titre abrégé: Biol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101247722

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 06 2019
Historique:
entrez: 20 6 2019
pubmed: 20 6 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Various vertebrate species use relative numerosity judgements in comparative assessments of quantities for which they use larger/smaller relationships rather than absolute number. The numerical ability of honeybees shares basic properties with that of vertebrates but their use of absolute or relative numerosity has not been explored. We trained free-flying bees to choose variable images containing three dots; one group ('larger') was trained to discriminate 3 from 2, while another group ('smaller') was trained to discriminate 3 from 4. In both cases, numbers were kept constant but stimulus characteristics and position were varied from trial to trial. Bees were then tested with novel stimuli displaying the previously trained numerosity (3) versus a novel numerosity (4 for 'larger' and 2 for 'smaller'). Both groups preferred the three-item stimulus, consistent with absolute numerosity. They also exhibited ratio-dependent discrimination of numbers, a property shared by vertebrates, as performance after 2 versus 3 was better than after 3 versus 4 training. Thus, bees differ from vertebrates in their use of absolute rather than of relative numerosity but they also have some numeric properties in common.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31213140
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0138
pmc: PMC6597503
doi:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.7rv4ct1']
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4526894']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20190138

Références

J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Aug 30;234:82-91
pubmed: 24793399
Behav Brain Res. 2012 May 1;230(2):343-8
pubmed: 22387428
Science. 2018 Jun 08;360(6393):1124-1126
pubmed: 29880690
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):198-203
pubmed: 12744974
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 29;6:1649
pubmed: 26579032
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 09;280(1772):20131907
pubmed: 24107530
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2007 Aug;193(8):801-24
pubmed: 17639413
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):683-9
pubmed: 18504627
Cognition. 2000 Jan 10;74(1):B1-B11
pubmed: 10594312
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Aug;188(7):503-12
pubmed: 12209339
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 30;283(1827):20160083
pubmed: 27009227
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 15;5(10):e15370
pubmed: 20976170
Anim Cogn. 2006 Jul;9(3):159-72
pubmed: 16575587
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 22;282(1799):20142384
pubmed: 25473017
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31923
pubmed: 22355405
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):409-424
pubmed: 28526128
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740):
pubmed: 29292361
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4263
pubmed: 19173008
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014 Jun;200(6):449-61
pubmed: 24788332
Biol Lett. 2019 Jun 28;15(6):20190138
pubmed: 31213140
Sci Adv. 2019 Feb 06;5(2):eaav0961
pubmed: 30775440
Annu Rev Entomol. 2014;59:165-84
pubmed: 24160424
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):6-10
pubmed: 15639434
Anim Cogn. 2015 Sep;18(5):1007-17
pubmed: 25846961
Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:423-43
pubmed: 20868283
Curr Biol. 2018 Apr 2;28(7):1090-1094.e4
pubmed: 29551415
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740):
pubmed: 29292356
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):403-404
pubmed: 28526126
Neuron. 2018 Nov 7;100(3):753-761.e4
pubmed: 30244883
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Nov;130(4):380-390
pubmed: 27736107

Auteurs

Maria Bortot (M)

1 Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento , 38068 Rovereto , Italy.
2 Research Centre on Animal Cognition, Center for Integrative Biology, CNRS, University of Toulouse , 31062 Toulouse Cedex 09 , France.

Christian Agrillo (C)

3 Department of General Psychology, University of Padova , 35131 Padova , Italy.

Aurore Avarguès-Weber (A)

2 Research Centre on Animal Cognition, Center for Integrative Biology, CNRS, University of Toulouse , 31062 Toulouse Cedex 09 , France.

Angelo Bisazza (A)

3 Department of General Psychology, University of Padova , 35131 Padova , Italy.

Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini (ME)

4 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London , London E1 4NS , UK.

Martin Giurfa (M)

2 Research Centre on Animal Cognition, Center for Integrative Biology, CNRS, University of Toulouse , 31062 Toulouse Cedex 09 , France.
5 College of Bee Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University , Fuzhou 350002 , People's Republic of China.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH