Optimization of tube voltage in X-ray dark-field chest radiography.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 06 2019
18 06 2019
Historique:
received:
22
11
2018
accepted:
04
06
2019
entrez:
20
6
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
20
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Grating-based X-ray dark-field imaging is a novel imaging modality which has been refined during the last decade. It exploits the wave-like behaviour of X-radiation and can nowadays be implemented with existing X-ray tubes used in clinical applications. The method is based on the detection of small-angle X-ray scattering, which occurs e.g. at air-tissue-interfaces in the lung or bone-fat interfaces in spongy bone. In contrast to attenuation-based chest X-ray imaging, the optimal tube voltage for dark-field imaging of the thorax has not yet been examined. In this work, dark-field scans with tube voltages ranging from 60 to 120 kVp were performed on a deceased human body. We analyzed the resulting images with respect to subjective and objective image quality, and found that the optimum tube voltage for dark-field thorax imaging at the used setup is at rather low energies of around 60 to 70 kVp. Furthermore, we found that at these tube voltages, the transmission radiographs still exhibit sufficient image quality to correlate dark-field information. Therefore, this study may serve as an important guideline for the development of clinical dark-field chest X-ray imaging devices for future routine use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31213645
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45256-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-45256-2
pmc: PMC6582156
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8699Références
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Mar-Apr;39(2):286-9
pubmed: 25786094
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2602
pubmed: 29422512
Invest Radiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):653-8
pubmed: 24853070
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204565
pubmed: 30261038
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 13;3:3209
pubmed: 24220606
Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):2774-2779
pubmed: 27277024
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17880-5
pubmed: 23074250
Rev Sci Instrum. 2007 Apr;78(4):043710
pubmed: 17477673
Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007 Apr;3(2):e18
pubmed: 21614270
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 01;5:17492
pubmed: 26619958
Nat Mater. 2008 Feb;7(2):134-7
pubmed: 18204454
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4807
pubmed: 28684858
Appl Opt. 2011 Aug 1;50(22):4310-9
pubmed: 21833104
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7(1):402
pubmed: 28341830
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):1959-65
pubmed: 25832086
Rev Sci Instrum. 2017 Jan;88(1):015104
pubmed: 28147659
Invest Radiol. 2016 Oct;51(10):597-601
pubmed: 27603110
Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):553-61
pubmed: 25531388
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 13;6:24269
pubmed: 27072871
Opt Express. 2010 Aug 2;18(16):16890-901
pubmed: 20721081
Radiology. 2013 Nov;269(2):427-33
pubmed: 23696682
Invest Radiol. 2015 Jul;50(7):430-5
pubmed: 25761095
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):W4-10
pubmed: 25539272
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571