Reflecting on Behavioral Spillover in Context: How Do Behavioral Motivations and Awareness Catalyze Other Environmentally Responsible Actions in Brazil, China, and Denmark?
Brazil
China
Denmark
behavioral spillover
cross-cultural
pro-environmental behaviour
qualitative
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
06
09
2018
accepted:
22
03
2019
entrez:
20
6
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
20
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Responding to serious environmental problems, requires urgent and fundamental shifts in our day-to-day lifestyles. This paper employs a qualitative, cross-cultural approach to explore people's subjective self-reflections on their experiences of pro-environmental behavioral spillover in three countries; Brazil, China, and Denmark. Behavioral spillover is an appealing yet elusive phenomenon, but offers a potential way of encouraging wider, voluntary lifestyle shifts beyond the scope of single behavior change interventions. Behavioral spillover theory proposes that engaging in one pro-environmental action can catalyze the performance of others. To date, evidence for the phenomenon has been mixed, and the causal processes governing relationships between behaviors appear complex, inconsistent and only partly understood. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by investigating accounts of behavioral spillover in three diverse cultural settings using qualitative semi-structured interviews. The analysis shows that while around half of participants overall who were questioned recalled spillover effects, the other half had not consciously experienced spillover. There were few significant differences across cultures, though some forms of spillover effects were reported more in some cultures than others. More environmentally engaged participants across all three countries were significantly more likely to experience spillover than those who were less engaged. Accounts of within-domain spillovers were most commonly reported, mainly comprising waste, resource conservation and consumption-related actions. Accounts of between-domain spillover were very rare. Recollection of contextual and interpersonal spillover effects also emerged from the interviews. Our findings suggest that more conscious behavioral spillover pathways may be limited to those with pre-existing environmental values. Behavioral spillover may comprise multiple pathways incorporating conscious and unconscious processes. We conclude that targeting behavioral catalysts that generate more socially diffuse spillover effects could offer more potential than conventional spillover involving a single individual.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31214064
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00788
pmc: PMC6558077
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
788Références
Am J Community Psychol. 2000 Dec;28(6):773-91
pubmed: 11109478
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):617-30
pubmed: 12570978
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621
pubmed: 14744228
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Sep;93(3):478-90
pubmed: 17723061
Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):523-8
pubmed: 19320857
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18452-6
pubmed: 19858494
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):540-58
pubmed: 25716992
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222
pubmed: 27499705
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Aug 14;2:2333393615597674
pubmed: 28462313
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061