Molecular Characterization of 87 Functional Genes in Wheat Diversity Panel and Their Association With Phenotypes Under Well-Watered and Water-Limited Conditions.
drought tolerance
functional markers
kompetitive allele-specific PCR markers
marker-trait association
synthetic-derivatives
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
01
2019
accepted:
15
05
2019
entrez:
20
6
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
20
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Modern breeding imposed selection for improved productivity that largely influenced the frequency of superior alleles underpinning traits of breeding interest. Therefore, molecular diagnosis for the allelic variations of such genes is important to manipulate beneficial alleles in wheat molecular breeding. We analyzed a diversity panel largely consisted of advanced lines derived from synthetic hexaploid wheats for allelic variation at 87 functional genes or loci of breeding importance using 124 high-throughput KASP markers. We also developed two KASP markers for water-soluble carbohydrate genes (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31214230
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00717
pmc: PMC6558208
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
717Références
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Mar;106(5):923-30
pubmed: 12647068
Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 1;23(19):2633-5
pubmed: 17586829
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Jan;116(2):213-21
pubmed: 17943267
Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Feb;118(4):695-702
pubmed: 19034409
New Phytol. 2009 Mar;181(4):843-50
pubmed: 19140945
Hereditas. 2009 Oct;146(5):208-56
pubmed: 19891741
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Jun;33(6):926-42
pubmed: 20199626
Funct Integr Genomics. 2011 Mar;11(1):49-61
pubmed: 20821031
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Jan;122(1):211-23
pubmed: 20838758
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Jun;125(1):1-10
pubmed: 22366867
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33234
pubmed: 22457747
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Sep;125(5):1057-68
pubmed: 22643902
New Phytol. 2012 Aug;195(3):574-84
pubmed: 22670578
Planta. 2013 Jun;237(6):1495-508
pubmed: 23462884
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr;164(4):1918-29
pubmed: 24402050
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Apr 25;14:107
pubmed: 24766773
Mol Breed. 2014;34:297-310
pubmed: 25076837
New Phytol. 2015 Jan;205(1):293-305
pubmed: 25250511
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Dec;127(12):2695-709
pubmed: 25322723
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 May;14(5):1269-80
pubmed: 26480952
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 08;11(4):e0152852
pubmed: 27058239
Nat Plants. 2015 Jan 26;1:14016
pubmed: 27246757
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Oct;129(10):1843-60
pubmed: 27306516
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 01;7:772
pubmed: 27313595
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Feb;130(2):309-318
pubmed: 27744491
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0164293
pubmed: 27802269
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Mar;130(3):515-528
pubmed: 27872942
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Jun;130(6):1081-1098
pubmed: 28314933
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Sep;130(9):1819-1835
pubmed: 28577083
Mol Plant. 2017 Aug 7;10(8):1047-1064
pubmed: 28669791
Protoplasma. 2018 Jul;255(4):1039-1052
pubmed: 29380071
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Mar;23(3):184-186
pubmed: 29426713
New Phytol. 2018 May;218(3):1247-1259
pubmed: 29528492
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Jul;131(7):1433-1442
pubmed: 29556941
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):767-784
pubmed: 30673804
Plant Dis. 2013 Mar;97(3):379-386
pubmed: 30722363
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Jun 5;9(6):1957-1973
pubmed: 31018942