Properties of neurons in the superficial laminae of trigeminal nucleus caudalis.
Action Potentials
/ physiology
Afferent Pathways
/ physiology
Animals
Cluster Analysis
Electrophysiological Phenomena
Evoked Potentials
/ physiology
Female
Male
Membrane Potentials
/ physiology
Mice, Knockout
Neurons
/ physiology
Neurons, Afferent
/ physiology
Nuclear Lamina
/ physiology
Optogenetics
/ methods
Patch-Clamp Techniques
Photic Stimulation
/ methods
Synapses
/ physiology
TRPV Cation Channels
/ physiology
Trigeminal Nuclei
/ cytology
Craniofacial
electrophysiological properties
neuronal classification
trigeminal
waveform
Journal
Physiological reports
ISSN: 2051-817X
Titre abrégé: Physiol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101607800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
22
04
2019
accepted:
24
04
2019
entrez:
20
6
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNc) receives extensive afferent innervation from peripheral sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglion (TG), and is the first central relay in the circuitry underpinning orofacial pain. Despite the initial characterization of the neurons in the superficial laminae, many questions remain. Here we report on electrophysiological properties of 535 superficial lamina I/II TNc neurons. Based on their firing pattern, we assigned these cells to five main groups, including (1) tonic, (2) phasic, (3) delayed, (4) H-current, and (5) tonic-phasic neurons, groups that exhibit distinct intrinsic properties and share some similarity with groups identified in the spinal dorsal horn. Driving predominantly nociceptive TG primary afferents using optogenetic stimulation in TRPV1/ChR2 animals, we found that tonic and H-current cells are most likely to receive pure monosynaptic input, whereas delayed neurons are more likely to exhibit inputs that appear polysynaptic. Finally, for the first time in TNc neurons, we used unsupervised clustering analysis methods and found that the kinetics of the action potentials and other intrinsic properties of these groups differ significantly from one another. Unsupervised spectral clustering based solely on a single voltage response to rheobase current was sufficient to group cells with shared properties independent of action potential discharge pattern, indicating that this approach can be effectively applied to identify functional neuronal subclasses. Together, our data illustrate that cells in the TNc with distinct patterns of TRPV1/ChR2 afferent innervation are physiologically diverse, but can be understood as a few major groups of cells having shared functional properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31215180
doi: 10.14814/phy2.14112
pmc: PMC6581829
doi:
Substances chimiques
TRPV Cation Channels
0
TRPV1 protein, mouse
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14112Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : NS088453
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.
Références
Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1714-28
pubmed: 25961142
Pain. 2009 Nov;146(1-2):214-21
pubmed: 19703729
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jun;20(6):804-814
pubmed: 28436981
Brain Res Brain Res Protoc. 1998 Sep;3(1):7-13
pubmed: 9767080
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;79(3):1583-6
pubmed: 9497435
Neuron. 2018 Mar 7;97(5):1004-1021
pubmed: 29518355
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e73022
pubmed: 23951340
J Physiol. 2004 Oct 1;560(Pt 1):249-66
pubmed: 15284347
Science. 1998 Dec 4;282(5395):1890-3
pubmed: 9836639
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82
pubmed: 23997866
Pain. 2019 Feb;160(2):442-462
pubmed: 30247267
Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):797-812
pubmed: 26291162
Physiol Rep. 2019 Jul;7(12):e14112
pubmed: 31215180
J Physiol. 2002 May 15;541(Pt 1):231-44
pubmed: 12015432
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 17;32(42):14519-31
pubmed: 23077037
J Neurosci. 2014 Nov 26;34(48):15898-911
pubmed: 25429132
Brain Res. 1999 Jun 26;833(1):71-80
pubmed: 10375678
Nat Commun. 2012 May 08;3:816
pubmed: 22569364
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1137-51
pubmed: 27334950
J Gen Physiol. 1998 Oct;112(4):503-22
pubmed: 9758867
J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8827-40
pubmed: 23678125
Eur J Neurosci. 1994 Jun 1;6(6):998-1007
pubmed: 7952286
Pain. 2010 Nov;151(2):475-88
pubmed: 20817353
Neuron. 1998 Jul;21(1):9-12
pubmed: 9697847
Neuron. 2016 Oct 5;92(1):84-92
pubmed: 27710792
Cardiovasc Res. 2008 Jun 1;78(3):466-75
pubmed: 18252758
Neuron. 2010 Mar 11;65(5):657-69
pubmed: 20223201
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):8263-8
pubmed: 24830427
Cell. 2014 Dec 4;159(6):1417-1432
pubmed: 25467445
Neuron. 2018 Sep 5;99(5):941-955.e4
pubmed: 30122375
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Dec 3;446(2-3):65-9
pubmed: 18817844
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):181-90
pubmed: 11257906
Neuroscience. 2007 Jun 29;147(2):325-33
pubmed: 17543462
J Physiol. 2002 Apr 1;540(Pt 1):189-207
pubmed: 11927679
Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3 Suppl):S25-32
pubmed: 21292394
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 22;38(34):7529-7540
pubmed: 30054391
J Physiol. 2018 Sep;596(17):4219-4235
pubmed: 29917235
Neuron. 2018 Apr 4;98(1):90-108.e5
pubmed: 29576387
Neuron. 2018 Oct 24;100(2):349-360
pubmed: 30359601
J Physiol. 2014 Feb 15;592(4):759-76
pubmed: 24324003
J Physiol. 2004 Mar 1;555(Pt 2):527-43
pubmed: 14694142
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 28;6:24904
pubmed: 27121468
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Jul;62(1):109-18
pubmed: 2754464
J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 27;30(43):14420-9
pubmed: 20980599
J Comp Neurol. 1978 Jul 15;180(2):395-413
pubmed: 659668
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Dec 30;238:43-53
pubmed: 25256647
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jun 1;27(6):3186-3207
pubmed: 27269961