Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO.
Health personnel
Health policy
Organization and administration
Journal
Human resources for health
ISSN: 1478-4491
Titre abrégé: Hum Resour Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 06 2019
18 06 2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
accepted:
07
06
2019
entrez:
20
6
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In order to analyse the institutional capacity for health workforce policy development and implementation in countries in the South-East Asia region, the WHO facilitated a cross-sectional analysis of functions performed, structure, personnel, management and information systems of human resources for health (HRH) units in Ministries of Health. A self-assessment survey on the characteristics and roles of HRH units was administered to relevant Government officials; the responses were validated through face-to-face workshops and by the WHO staff. Findings were tabulated to produce frequency distributions of the variables examined, and qualitative elements categorized according to a framework for capacity building in the health sector. Ten countries out of the 11 in the region responded to the survey. Seven out of 10 reported having an HRH unit, though their scope, roles, capacity and size displayed considerable variability. Some functions (such as planning and health workforce data management) were reportedly carried out in all countries, while others (inter-sectoral coordination, research, labour relations) were only performed in few. The strengthening of the HRH governance capacity in countries should follow a logical hierarchy, identifying first and foremost the essential functions that the public sector is expected to perform to optimize HRH governance. The definition of expected roles and functions will in turn allow identifying the upstream system-wide factors and the downstream capacity requirements for the strengthening of the HRH units. The focus should ultimately be on ensuring that all the key strategic functions are performed to quality standards, irrespective of institutional arrangements.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In order to analyse the institutional capacity for health workforce policy development and implementation in countries in the South-East Asia region, the WHO facilitated a cross-sectional analysis of functions performed, structure, personnel, management and information systems of human resources for health (HRH) units in Ministries of Health.
CASE PRESENTATION
A self-assessment survey on the characteristics and roles of HRH units was administered to relevant Government officials; the responses were validated through face-to-face workshops and by the WHO staff. Findings were tabulated to produce frequency distributions of the variables examined, and qualitative elements categorized according to a framework for capacity building in the health sector. Ten countries out of the 11 in the region responded to the survey. Seven out of 10 reported having an HRH unit, though their scope, roles, capacity and size displayed considerable variability. Some functions (such as planning and health workforce data management) were reportedly carried out in all countries, while others (inter-sectoral coordination, research, labour relations) were only performed in few.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
The strengthening of the HRH governance capacity in countries should follow a logical hierarchy, identifying first and foremost the essential functions that the public sector is expected to perform to optimize HRH governance. The definition of expected roles and functions will in turn allow identifying the upstream system-wide factors and the downstream capacity requirements for the strengthening of the HRH units. The focus should ultimately be on ensuring that all the key strategic functions are performed to quality standards, irrespective of institutional arrangements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31215442
doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0385-1
pii: 10.1186/s12960-019-0385-1
pmc: PMC6582590
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Références
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 03;7:6
pubmed: 19192269
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Mar/Apr;24 Suppl 2:S74-S81
pubmed: 29369260
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1836-45
pubmed: 16808993
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 25;7:16
pubmed: 19239716
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):868-73
pubmed: 24347712
Public Health. 2015 Sep;129(9):1138-49
pubmed: 26032194
Reprod Health Matters. 2006 May;14(27):27-39
pubmed: 16713877
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Jun 30;7:53
pubmed: 19566926
Hum Resour Health. 2011 Nov 24;9:29
pubmed: 22115191
Hum Resour Health. 2011 May 17;9:12
pubmed: 21586156
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006 Nov;19(3):385-7
pubmed: 17178522
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1163-e1175
pubmed: 30309799
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):864-7
pubmed: 24347711
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):336-45
pubmed: 15310668
Hum Resour Health. 2011 Apr 12;9:10
pubmed: 21486438
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 10;7:8
pubmed: 19208253
Health Econ. 2014 Feb;23(2):129-40
pubmed: 24327240
Hum Resour Health. 2007 Oct 19;5:25
pubmed: 17949496
Hum Resour Health. 2011 May 12;9:11
pubmed: 21569435
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Mar;23(2):137-49
pubmed: 18234704