Is kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising at baseline associated with chronic pain and disability in whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review.


Journal

British journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1473-0480
Titre abrégé: Br J Sports Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0432520

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
accepted: 31 05 2019
pubmed: 21 6 2019
medline: 28 8 2020
entrez: 21 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising may be associated with patients' transition from having acute to chronic pain following a whiplash injury. To systematically review and critically appraise the literature to determine whether kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising are associated with greater likelihood of patients developing chronic pain and disability following a whiplash injury. A systematic review of the literature DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches of PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubPsych, and grey literature were undertaken from inception to September 2017. Study selection was based on longitudinal studies evaluating how kinesiophobia and/or pain catastrophising at baseline are associated with pain intensity, disability or both after a whiplash injury. We included 14 longitudinal studies that described 12 independent cohorts with a total sample of 2733 participants with whiplash-associated disorder. Kinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time (three studies). Whether kinesiophobia at baseline was associated with disability was unclear as results were conflicting (six studies). There were also conflicting results when we examined the association between pain catastrophising and both pain intensity (five studies) and disability (eight studies). Kinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time. There were conflicting results for the remaining analyses. The size of the associations was small. The overall quality of the evidence was very low. CRD42016053864.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising may be associated with patients' transition from having acute to chronic pain following a whiplash injury.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and critically appraise the literature to determine whether kinesiophobia and pain catastrophising are associated with greater likelihood of patients developing chronic pain and disability following a whiplash injury.
DESIGN METHODS
A systematic review of the literature DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches of PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubPsych, and grey literature were undertaken from inception to September 2017.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES METHODS
Study selection was based on longitudinal studies evaluating how kinesiophobia and/or pain catastrophising at baseline are associated with pain intensity, disability or both after a whiplash injury.
RESULTS RESULTS
We included 14 longitudinal studies that described 12 independent cohorts with a total sample of 2733 participants with whiplash-associated disorder. Kinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time (three studies). Whether kinesiophobia at baseline was associated with disability was unclear as results were conflicting (six studies). There were also conflicting results when we examined the association between pain catastrophising and both pain intensity (five studies) and disability (eight studies).
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Kinesiophobia at baseline was not associated with pain intensity over time. There were conflicting results for the remaining analyses. The size of the associations was small. The overall quality of the evidence was very low.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER BACKGROUND
CRD42016053864.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31217158
pii: bjsports-2018-099569
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099569
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

892-897

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Alejandro Luque-Suarez (A)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain aluques@uma.es.
Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain.

Deborah Falla (D)

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio (JM)

Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spains.

Javier Martinez-Calderon (J)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH