Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS) utility and validation for triaging patients with obstetric sepsis in the emergency department: Evidence from a low income health care setting.

Illness severity scores Sepsis in Obstetrics Score sepsis

Journal

Obstetric medicine
ISSN: 1753-495X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101464191

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez: 21 6 2019
pubmed: 21 6 2019
medline: 21 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Illness severity scores commonly used in critical care settings are not considered appropriate in obstetric practice as they do not account for pregnancy physiology. A new illness severity score called the 'Sepsis in Obstetrics Score' (SOS) was introduced by Albright et al. for triaging patients with sepsis in pregnancy in an emergency department setting. We aimed to determine whether this score could predict the need for critical care support using the presence of organ failure as the identification criteria. Severity and culture positivity in pregnancy-associated sepsis was also assessed. All pregnant, postabortal and postpartum women with suspected sepsis were enrolled (as per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria) were enrolled. Severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was defined as dysfunction of one or more organs due to sepsis. The severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis was graded according to the number of organ failures. A SOS cut off of 6 was taken for statistical analysis. Out of 100 women with pregnancy-associated sepsis, 'severe sepsis' was present in 58%. When the SOS test performance was compared with the severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis, it had sensitivity of 68.9% and specificity of 80.9%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value 65% to predict severe sepsis. The area under curve for the SOS detecting severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was 0.810. SOS predicted organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis and this was statistically significant for all organs involved. Culture positivity did not correlate with the SOS in our study. Sepsis in Obstetrics Score correlated well with organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis. It had a high positive predictive value (83%) for severe sepsis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Illness severity scores commonly used in critical care settings are not considered appropriate in obstetric practice as they do not account for pregnancy physiology. A new illness severity score called the 'Sepsis in Obstetrics Score' (SOS) was introduced by Albright et al. for triaging patients with sepsis in pregnancy in an emergency department setting.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
We aimed to determine whether this score could predict the need for critical care support using the presence of organ failure as the identification criteria. Severity and culture positivity in pregnancy-associated sepsis was also assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
All pregnant, postabortal and postpartum women with suspected sepsis were enrolled (as per systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria) were enrolled. Severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was defined as dysfunction of one or more organs due to sepsis. The severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis was graded according to the number of organ failures. A SOS cut off of 6 was taken for statistical analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 100 women with pregnancy-associated sepsis, 'severe sepsis' was present in 58%. When the SOS test performance was compared with the severity of pregnancy-associated sepsis, it had sensitivity of 68.9% and specificity of 80.9%, positive predictive value of 83% and negative predictive value 65% to predict severe sepsis. The area under curve for the SOS detecting severe pregnancy-associated sepsis was 0.810. SOS predicted organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis and this was statistically significant for all organs involved. Culture positivity did not correlate with the SOS in our study.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Sepsis in Obstetrics Score correlated well with organ failure in pregnancy-associated sepsis. It had a high positive predictive value (83%) for severe sepsis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31217814
doi: 10.1177/1753495X18761522
pii: 10.1177_1753495X18761522
pmc: PMC6560845
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

90-96

Références

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Oct;90(4 Pt 1):553-61
pubmed: 9380315
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6
pubmed: 12682500
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Apr-Jun;30(2):95-105
pubmed: 26825620
BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1089-93; discussion 1093-4
pubmed: 11337436
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;28(2):73-8
pubmed: 26825182
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;25(2):140-2
pubmed: 15814392
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377
pubmed: 28101605
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118 Suppl 1:1-203
pubmed: 21356004
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):39.e1-8
pubmed: 24613756
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):e49-e57
pubmed: 27618276

Auteurs

Rachna Agarwal (R)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.

Rajesh Kumar Yadav (RK)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.

Medha Mohta (M)

Department of Anaesthesia, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.

Meera Sikka (M)

Department of Pathology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.

Gita Radhakrishnan (G)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur, Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH