A Dual Approach for the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities: Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy and Posterior Decompression with Fusion.
Axis
Basilar invagination
CT, Computed tomography
CVJ, Craniovertebral junction
CXA, Clivoaxial angle
Chiari
EEA, Endoscopic endonasal approach
Endonasal
Endoscopic
MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging
Odontoidectomy
POD, Postoperative day
Pediatric
VBSC, Ventral brainstem compression
WCMC, Weill Cornell Medical College
Journal
World neurosurgery: X
ISSN: 2590-1397
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg X
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101747743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
29
08
2018
accepted:
02
01
2019
entrez:
21
6
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
21
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ventral brainstem compression secondary to complex craniovertebral junction abnormality is an infrequent cause of neurologic deterioration in pediatric patients. However, in cases of symptomatic, irreducible ventral compression, 360° decompression of the brainstem supported by posterior stabilization may provide the best opportunity for improvement in symptoms. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal corridor has been proposed as an alternative method of odontoidectomy associated with less morbidity. We report the largest single case series of pediatric patients using this dual-intervention surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent posterior occipitocervical decompression and instrumentation followed by endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy performed to relieve neurologic impingement involving the ventral brainstem and craniocervical junction. Between January 2011 and February 2017, 7 patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion followed by endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy at our unit. Standardized clinical and radiological parameters were assessed before and after surgery. A univariate analysis was performed to assess clinical and radiologic improvement after surgery. A total of 14 operations were performed on 7 pediatric patients. One patient had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 1 patient had a Chiari 1 malformation, and the remaining 5 patients had Chiari 1.5 malformations. Average extubation day was postoperative day 0.9. Average day of initiation of postoperative feeds was postoperative day 1.0. The combined endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy and posterior decompression and fusion for complex craniovertebral compression is a safe and effective procedure that appears to be well tolerated in the pediatric population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Ventral brainstem compression secondary to complex craniovertebral junction abnormality is an infrequent cause of neurologic deterioration in pediatric patients. However, in cases of symptomatic, irreducible ventral compression, 360° decompression of the brainstem supported by posterior stabilization may provide the best opportunity for improvement in symptoms. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal corridor has been proposed as an alternative method of odontoidectomy associated with less morbidity. We report the largest single case series of pediatric patients using this dual-intervention surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent posterior occipitocervical decompression and instrumentation followed by endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy performed to relieve neurologic impingement involving the ventral brainstem and craniocervical junction.
METHODS
METHODS
Between January 2011 and February 2017, 7 patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion followed by endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy at our unit. Standardized clinical and radiological parameters were assessed before and after surgery. A univariate analysis was performed to assess clinical and radiologic improvement after surgery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 14 operations were performed on 7 pediatric patients. One patient had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 1 patient had a Chiari 1 malformation, and the remaining 5 patients had Chiari 1.5 malformations. Average extubation day was postoperative day 0.9. Average day of initiation of postoperative feeds was postoperative day 1.0.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The combined endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy and posterior decompression and fusion for complex craniovertebral compression is a safe and effective procedure that appears to be well tolerated in the pediatric population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31218285
doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100010
pii: S2590-1397(19)30004-3
pii: 100010
pmc: PMC6580888
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100010Références
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Mar;5(3):285-91
pubmed: 20192647
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):E139-43
pubmed: 19214083
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2013 Mar-Apr;23(2):123-6
pubmed: 23611328
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Aug;10(2):134-41
pubmed: 22725652
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1486-1491
pubmed: 28621629
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):189-95
pubmed: 15835107
Skull Base. 2010 May;20(3):199-205
pubmed: 21318039
J Neurosurg. 2003 Jan;98(1 Suppl):43-9
pubmed: 12546387
Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1127-36
pubmed: 23224062
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):846-53
pubmed: 24525988
Neurosurgery. 2008 Aug;63(2):E373-4; discussion E374
pubmed: 18797319
J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):179-83
pubmed: 15835105
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Mar;69(3):429-36
pubmed: 3818705
J Neurosurg. 2006 Jul;105(1 Suppl):55-61
pubmed: 16871871
J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1 Suppl):36-42
pubmed: 17644919
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov;271(11):3101-5
pubmed: 24986428
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;33(4):169-81
pubmed: 11124633
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Aug;5(8):754-60
pubmed: 25946171
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E14
pubmed: 23905952
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Apr;8(4):376-80
pubmed: 18377323
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 Mar;144(3):219-25; discussion 225
pubmed: 11956934
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jul;57(1 Suppl):E213; discussion E213
pubmed: 15987596
B-ENT. 2011;7(3):209-13
pubmed: 22026144
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;26(4):487-9
pubmed: 22348299
Neurosurgery. 2013 Aug;73(2):296-303; discussion 303-4
pubmed: 23632764
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):566-72; discussion 572
pubmed: 12642763
J Neurosurg. 2003 Aug;99(2):291-6
pubmed: 12924703
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Jun;16(3):248-53
pubmed: 12792338
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Apr;38(4):E16
pubmed: 25828492
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Apr;38(4):E8
pubmed: 25828502
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):e4
pubmed: 15933301
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):923-931
pubmed: 28498058
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Nov;17(5):397-409
pubmed: 22998404
Neurosurgery. 2009 Apr;64(4):734-9; discussion 739
pubmed: 19349831
Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Nov;28(11):1971-5
pubmed: 22763656
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Apr;38(4):E12
pubmed: 25828488
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jun 1;22(11):1209-14
pubmed: 9201857
J Neurosurg. 1980 Oct;53(4):444-55
pubmed: 7420164
Int J Stroke. 2009 Jun;4(3):200-5
pubmed: 19659822
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Aug;15(4):284-9
pubmed: 12177543
Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Oct;28(10):1795-9
pubmed: 22585452
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jun;5(6):549-53
pubmed: 20515325
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Oct;24(10):1209-24
pubmed: 18389260
J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):511-8
pubmed: 25361480
Neurosurgery. 1999 Mar;44(3):520-7; discussion 527-8
pubmed: 10069589
Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):351-9; discussion 359-60
pubmed: 21826033