Deep brain stimulation has state-dependent effects on motor connectivity in Parkinson's disease.
Parkinson’s disease
basal ganglia
connectivity
deep brain stimulation
functional MRI
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2019
01 08 2019
Historique:
received:
11
12
2018
revised:
12
03
2019
accepted:
18
04
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
27
5
2020
entrez:
21
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease; however, its therapeutic mechanism is unclear. Previous modelling of functional MRI data has suggested that deep brain stimulation has modulatory effects on a number of basal ganglia pathways. This work uses an enhanced data collection protocol to collect rare functional MRI data in patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Eleven patients with Parkinson's disease and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation underwent functional MRI at rest and during a movement task; once with active deep brain stimulation, and once with deep brain stimulation switched off. Dynamic causal modelling and Bayesian model selection were first used to compare a series of plausible biophysical models of the cortico-basal ganglia circuit that could explain the functional MRI activity at rest in an attempt to reproduce and extend the findings from our previous work. General linear modelling of the movement task functional MRI data revealed deep brain stimulation-associated signal increases in the primary motor and cerebellar cortices. Given the significance of the cerebellum in voluntary movement, we then built a more complete model of the motor system by including cerebellar-basal ganglia interactions, and compared the modulatory effects deep brain stimulation had on different circuit components during the movement task and again using the resting state data. Consistent with previous results from our independent cohort, model comparison found that the rest data were best explained by deep brain stimulation-induced increased (effective) connectivity of the cortico-striatal, thalamo-cortical and direct pathway and reduced coupling of subthalamic nucleus afferent and efferent connections. No changes in cerebellar connectivity were identified at rest. In contrast, during the movement task, there was functional recruitment of subcortical-cerebellar pathways, which were additionally modulated by deep brain stimulation, as well as modulation of local (intrinsic) cortical and cerebellar circuits. This work provides in vivo evidence for the modulatory effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on effective connectivity within the cortico-basal ganglia loops at rest, as well as further modulations in the cortico-cerebellar motor system during voluntary movement. We propose that deep brain stimulation has both behaviour-independent effects on basal ganglia connectivity, as well as behaviour-dependent modulatory effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31219504
pii: 5521131
doi: 10.1093/brain/awz164
pmc: PMC7053573
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2417-2431Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M009106/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Trends Neurosci. 1990 Jul;13(7):281-5
pubmed: 1695404
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1273-302
pubmed: 12948688
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Mar 12;6(3):e1000709
pubmed: 20300649
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:229-57
pubmed: 16776585
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 4;107(18):8452-6
pubmed: 20404184
Trends Neurosci. 1989 Oct;12(10):366-75
pubmed: 2479133
Neurology. 2003 Sep 23;61(6):816-21
pubmed: 14504327
Ann Neurol. 1997 Sep;42(3):283-91
pubmed: 9307248
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;82(4):358-63
pubmed: 20571041
Neuromodulation. 2007 Jul;10(3):206-15
pubmed: 22150834
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;17(2):124-31, 115
pubmed: 21625231
J Neurol. 2010 Jan;257(1):72-8
pubmed: 19662326
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 May;82(5):569-73
pubmed: 20935326
J Nucl Med. 2002 Jun;43(6):725-32
pubmed: 12050315
Brain. 2006 Oct;129(Pt 10):2667-78
pubmed: 16844713
Arch Neurol. 1999 Aug;56(8):997-1003
pubmed: 10448806
J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 11;28(24):6165-73
pubmed: 18550758
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49056
pubmed: 23145068
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):750-7
pubmed: 12808459
Ann Neurol. 2010 Oct;68(4):521-34
pubmed: 20687206
World Neurosurg. 2011 Jul-Aug;76(1-2):164-72; discussion 69-73
pubmed: 21839969
Mov Disord. 2001 Nov;16(6):1126-32
pubmed: 11748747
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):269-81
pubmed: 21387372
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:542-9
pubmed: 23850463
Arch Neurol. 2004 Aug;61(8):1307-13
pubmed: 15313852
Mov Disord. 2011 Aug 15;26(10):1835-43
pubmed: 21674623
Neurobiol Dis. 2010 Jun;38(3):329-37
pubmed: 19804831
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Aug 21;9:264-74
pubmed: 26509113
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):89-96
pubmed: 14732625
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1004-17
pubmed: 19306932
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Jul;31(7):1612-22
pubmed: 21468092
Neuroimage. 1997 Oct;6(3):218-29
pubmed: 9344826
Brain. 2014 Apr;137(Pt 4):1130-44
pubmed: 24566670
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 22;9:670
pubmed: 26733846
Cereb Cortex. 2014 May;24(5):1165-77
pubmed: 23283687
Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):903-19
pubmed: 11304086
J Neurosci. 2016 May 11;36(19):5362-72
pubmed: 27170132
Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):39-46
pubmed: 19457380
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 May 29;14(5):e1006217
pubmed: 29813060
Brain. 2017 Mar 1;140(3):721-734
pubmed: 28073788
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 09;19:1025-1035
pubmed: 30035027
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Nov 27;9:164
pubmed: 26640432
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;85(4):1351-6
pubmed: 11287459
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):4780-5
pubmed: 23471992
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Oct;32(7):1080-91
pubmed: 21039947
Nat Neurosci. 2015 May;18(5):779-86
pubmed: 25867121
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2712-7
pubmed: 21325540
N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 15;339(16):1105-11
pubmed: 9770557
J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 29;23(30):9929-36
pubmed: 14586023
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:289-307
pubmed: 21692660
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):896-908
pubmed: 16943402
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):482-3
pubmed: 23363513
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):269-78
pubmed: 17936017
Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):605-15
pubmed: 22019080
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 6;33(10):4540-9
pubmed: 23467370
Brain. 2005 Oct;128(Pt 10):2372-82
pubmed: 16123144
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0129077
pubmed: 26061738
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 Feb;111(2):140-6
pubmed: 18995954
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50270
pubmed: 23300524
Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1192-9
pubmed: 16636237
Neuron. 2012 Dec 6;76(5):1030-41
pubmed: 23217750
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Dec;37(10 Pt 2):2676-88
pubmed: 24035740
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012 Jul;18(6):770-4
pubmed: 22591577
Neuroimage. 1999 Oct;10(4):385-96
pubmed: 10493897
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1244-53
pubmed: 20851193
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2009 Nov;49(11):507-13
pubmed: 19940398
Neuroimage. 2004 Jun;22(2):966-74
pubmed: 15193628
Neuroimage. 2019 Jun;193:103-114
pubmed: 30862535
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1491-3
pubmed: 16205719
Lancet. 1995 Jan 14;345(8942):91-5
pubmed: 7815888
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Mar;35(3):346-55
pubmed: 8699946
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:971-85
pubmed: 24018303
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:301-10
pubmed: 23153964
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):442-57
pubmed: 21310247
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997 Mar-Apr;7(2):365-70
pubmed: 9090592