Patterns of peritoneal dialysis catheter practices and technique failure in peritoneal dialysis: A nationwide cohort study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Catheterization
/ adverse effects
Catheters, Indwelling
/ adverse effects
Cohort Studies
Equipment Failure
/ statistics & numerical data
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Peritoneal Dialysis
/ adverse effects
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Failure
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
19
02
2019
accepted:
06
06
2019
entrez:
21
6
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
20
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our objective was to assess whether clusters of centers with similar peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter related practices were associated with differences in the risk of technique failure. Patients on incident PD in French centers contributing to the French Language PD Registry from 2012 to 2016 were included in a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Centers with similar catheter cares practices were gathered in clusters in a hierarchical analysis. Clusters of centers associated with technique failure were evaluated using Cox and Fine and Gray models. A mixed effect Cox model was used to assess the influence of a center effect, as explained by the clusters. Data from 2727 catheters placed in 64 centers in France were analyzed. Five clusters of centers were identified. After adjustment for patient-level characteristics, the fourth cluster was associated with a lower risk of technique failure (cause specific-HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.54-0.90. The variance of the center effect decreased by 5% after adjusting for patient characteristics and by 26% after adjusting for patient characteristics and clusters of centers in the mixed effect Cox model. Favorable outcomes were observed in clusters with a greater proportion of community hospitals, where catheters were placed via open surgery, first dressing done 6 to 15 days after catheter placement, and local prophylactic antibiotics was applied on exit-site. Several patterns of PD catheter related practices have been identified in France, associated with differences in the risk of technique failure. Combinations of favorable practices are suggested in this study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31220171
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218677
pii: PONE-D-19-04954
pmc: PMC6586404
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0218677Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Nov;29(11):2127-35
pubmed: 24071660
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 Oct;44(4):591-603
pubmed: 15384009
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Sep 28;:
pubmed: 28970365
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 29;5(1):1676
pubmed: 27733978
Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Jul;21(7):535-46
pubmed: 26807739
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):913-915
pubmed: 28505351
Perit Dial Int. 2016 9-10;36(5):509-18
pubmed: 26764341
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1018-1023
pubmed: 28472525
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Jun;71(6):814-821
pubmed: 29289475
Perit Dial Int. 2016 11-12;36(6):640-646
pubmed: 27147289
Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 Nov;64(5):761-9
pubmed: 24927898
Perit Dial Int. 2016 9-10;36(5):519-25
pubmed: 27044794
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):1090-1099
pubmed: 28637862
Perit Dial Int. 2016 9-10;36(5):481-508
pubmed: 27282851
Kidney Int Suppl. 2006 Nov;(103):S12-20
pubmed: 17080102
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Jul 15;170(2):244-56
pubmed: 19494242
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Apr;31(4):619-27
pubmed: 25906780
Perit Dial Int. 2017 1-2;37(1):30-34
pubmed: 27605683
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):1032-1034
pubmed: 28637864
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):89-97
pubmed: 29162681
Perit Dial Int. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):297-302
pubmed: 19458302
Perit Dial Int. 2014 Sep-Oct;34(6):627-35
pubmed: 24497590
Perit Dial Int. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):614-30
pubmed: 21880990