Metabolic Phenotyping of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Reveals a Unique Signature and Intrinsic Differences between Fat Pads.
Journal
Stem cells international
ISSN: 1687-966X
Titre abrégé: Stem Cells Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535822
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
02
11
2018
revised:
11
01
2019
accepted:
03
02
2019
entrez:
22
6
2019
pubmed:
22
6
2019
medline:
22
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
White adipose tissues are functionally heterogeneous and differently manage the excess of energy supply. While the expansion of subcutaneous adipose tissues (SAT) is protective in obesity, that of visceral adipose tissues (VAT) correlates with the emergence of metabolic diseases. Maintained in fat pads throughout life, adipose stem cells (ASC) are mesenchymal-like stem cells with adipogenesis and multipotent differentiation potential. ASC from distinct fat pads have long been reported to present distinct proliferation and differentiation potentials that are maintained in culture, yet the origins of these intrinsic differences are still unknown. Metabolism is central to stem cell fate decision in line with environmental changes. In this study, we performed high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomic analyses of ASC culture supernatants in order to characterize their metabolic phenotype in culture. We identified and quantified 29 ASC exometabolites and evaluated their consumption or secretion over 72 h of cell culture. Both ASC used glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism, as evidenced by the high secretions of lactate and citrate, respectively, but V-ASC mostly used glycolysis. By varying the composition of the cell culture medium, we showed that glutaminolysis, rather than glycolysis, supported the secretion of pyruvate, alanine, and citrate, evidencing a peculiar metabolism in ASC cells. The comparison of the two types of ASC in glutamine-free culture conditions also revealed the role of glutaminolysis in the limitation of pyruvate routing towards the lactate synthesis, in S-ASC but not in V-ASC. Altogether, our results suggest a difference between depots in the capacity of ASC mitochondria to assimilate pyruvate, with probable consequences on their differentiation potential in pathways requiring an increased mitochondrial activity. These results highlight a pivotal role of metabolic mechanisms in the discrimination between ASC and provide new perspectives in the understanding of their functional differences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31223312
doi: 10.1155/2019/9323864
pmc: PMC6541987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9323864Références
Endocr Rev. 2000 Dec;21(6):697-738
pubmed: 11133069
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2002 May;282(5):R1286-96
pubmed: 11959668
Diabetologia. 2002 Sep;45(9):1201-10
pubmed: 12242452
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jan;288(1):E267-77
pubmed: 15383371
Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7
pubmed: 16923606
Diabetes. 2006 Sep;55(9):2571-8
pubmed: 16936206
Diabetes. 2007 Apr;56(4):1010-3
pubmed: 17287468
FASEB J. 2008 Jan;22(1):9-18
pubmed: 17855623
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(11):2692-703
pubmed: 18007604
Stem Cells. 2009 Oct;27(10):2563-70
pubmed: 19658193
Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):829-34
pubmed: 20703299
Cell Stem Cell. 2010 Sep 3;7(3):380-90
pubmed: 20804973
J Cell Physiol. 2011 Oct;226(10):2562-70
pubmed: 21792913
Stem Cell Rev. 2012 Jun;8(2):375-92
pubmed: 21892603
EMBO J. 2011 Nov 15;30(24):4860-73
pubmed: 22085932
J Lipid Res. 2012 Feb;53(2):227-46
pubmed: 22140268
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Feb;97(2):E183-92
pubmed: 22162470
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36569
pubmed: 22574183
Cell Stem Cell. 2013 Jan 3;12(1):62-74
pubmed: 23290137
Nat Cell Biol. 2013 Mar;15(3):302-8
pubmed: 23434825
Bioinformatics. 2013 May 15;29(10):1348-9
pubmed: 23508967
Biochimie. 2013 Dec;95(12):2222-8
pubmed: 23770442
Open Bone J. 2012;4:null
pubmed: 24194797
J Regen Med Tissue Eng. 2013 May;2:null
pubmed: 24194979
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e77077
pubmed: 24204740
Cell Metab. 2014 Jan 7;19(1):8-20
pubmed: 24239569
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):960-5
pubmed: 24395786
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Apr;15(4):243-56
pubmed: 24651542
Nat Cell Biol. 2015 Apr;17(4):376-85
pubmed: 25730471
Stem Cells Dev. 2015 Sep 1;24(17):1957-71
pubmed: 26134242
Stem Cells. 2016 May;34(5):1163-76
pubmed: 27146024
Anal Chim Acta. 2016 Aug 31;934:194-202
pubmed: 27506360
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 25;18(9):null
pubmed: 28841158
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D608-D617
pubmed: 29140435
Stem Cells Int. 2018 Aug 19;2018:8031718
pubmed: 30210552
J Clin Invest. 1983 Oct;72(4):1200-8
pubmed: 6630508
J Clin Invest. 1997 Dec 15;100(12):3149-53
pubmed: 9399962
Diabetes. 1998 Aug;47(8):1365-8
pubmed: 9703343