Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: association with favorable local tumor control following Gamma Knife radiosurgery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.

BM = brain metastasis EGFR EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor GKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgery Gamma Knife KPS = Karnofsky Performance Scale NSCLC = non–small cell lung cancer OS = overall survival RTOG = Radiation Therapy Oncology Group SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor WBRT = whole-brain radiotherapy brain metastasis epidermal growth factor receptor mutation oncology stereotactic radiosurgery survival tumor control wild type

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 17 02 2019
accepted: 03 04 2019
pubmed: 22 6 2019
medline: 22 6 2019
entrez: 22 6 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been associated with elevated radiosensitivity in vitro. However, results from clinical studies on radiosensitivity in cases of NSCLC with EGFR mutations are inconclusive. This paper presents a retrospective analysis of patients with NSCLC who underwent regular follow-up imaging after radiotherapy for brain metastases (BMs). The authors also investigated the influence of EGFR mutations on the efficacy of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). This study included 264 patients (1069 BMs) who underwent GKRS treatment and for whom EGFR mutation status, demographics, performance status, and tumor characteristics were available. Radiological images were obtained at 3 months after GKRS and at 3-month intervals thereafter. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression analysis were used to correlate EGFR mutation status and other clinical features with tumor control and overall survival. The tumor control rates and overall 12-month survival rates were 87.8% and 65.5%, respectively. Tumor control rates in the EGFR mutant group versus the EGFR wild-type group were 90.5% versus 79.4% at 12 months and 75.0% versus 24.5% at 24 months. During the 2-year follow-up period after SRS, the intracranial response rate in the EGFR mutant group was approximately 3-fold higher than that in the wild-type group (p < 0.001). Cox regression multivariate analysis identified EGFR mutation status, extracranial metastasis, primary tumor control, and prescribed margin dose as predictors of tumor control (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.026, respectively). Treatment with a combination of GKRS and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was the most important predictor of overall survival (p < 0.001). The current study demonstrated that, among patients with NSCLC-BMs, EGFR mutations were independent prognostic factors of tumor control. It was also determined that a combination of GKRS and TKI had the most pronounced effect on prolonging survival after SRS. In select patient groups, treatment with SRS in conjunction with EGFR-TKIs provided effective tumor control for NSCLC-BMs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31226692
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.JNS19446
pii: 2019.4.JNS19446
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Cheng-Chia Lee (CC)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
6Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Sanford P C Hsu (SPC)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Chung-Jung Lin (CJ)

2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Hsiu-Mei Wu (HM)

2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Yu-Wei Chen (YW)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Yung-Hung Luo (YH)

3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
5Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
8Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Chi-Lu Chiang (CL)

3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
5Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
8Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Yong-Sin Hu (YS)

2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Wen-Yuh Chung (WY)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Cheng-Ying Shiau (CY)

3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.
4Cancer Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

Wan-Yuo Guo (WY)

2Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

David Hung-Chi Pan (D)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
7Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University; and.

Huai-Che Yang (HC)

1Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei.

Classifications MeSH