Chiari type I and hydrocephalus.
Chiari I malformation
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy
Hydrocephalus
Posterior cranial fossa
Journal
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1433-0350
Titre abrégé: Childs Nerv Syst
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8503227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
22
04
2019
accepted:
30
05
2019
pubmed:
23
6
2019
medline:
24
10
2020
entrez:
23
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The association between Chiari type I malformation (CIM) and hydrocephalus raises a great interest because of the still unclear pathogenesis and the management implications. The goal of this paper is to review the theories on the cause-effect mechanisms of such a relationship and to analyze the results of the management of this condition. A review of the literature has been performed, focusing on the articles specifically addressing the problem of CIM and hydrocephalus and on the series reporting about its treatment. Also, the personal authors' experience is briefly discussed. As far as the pathogenesis is concerned, it seems clear that raised intracranial pressure due to hydrocephalus can cause a transient and reversible tonsillar caudal ectopia ("pressure from above" hypothesis), which is something different from CIM. A "complex" hypothesis, on the other hand, can explain the occurrence of hydrocephalus and CIM because of the venous engorgement resulting from the hypoplasia of the posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and the occlusion of the jugular foramina, leading to cerebellar edema (CIM) and CSF hypo-resorption (hydrocephalus). Nevertheless, such a mechanism can be advocated only in a minority of cases (syndromic craniosynostosis). In non-syndromic CIM subjects, the presence of hydrocephalus could be explained by an occlusion of the basal CSF pathways, which would occur completely in a minority of cases (only 7-10% of CIM patients show hydrocephalus) while it would be partial in the remaining cases (no hydrocephalus). This hypothesis still needs to be demonstrated. As far as the management is concerned, the strategy to treat the hydrocephalus first is commonly accepted. Because of the "obstructive" origin of CIM-related hydrocephalus, the use of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is straightforward. Actually, the analysis of the literature, concerning 63 cases reported so far, reveals very high success rates of ETV in treating hydrocephalus (90.5%), CIM (78.5%), and syringomyelia symptoms (76%) as well as in giving a radiological improvement of both CIM (74%) and syringomyelia (89%). The failures of ETV were not attributable to CIM or syringomyelia. Only 11% of cases required PCF decompression after ETV. The association between CIM and hydrocephalus probably results from different, multifactorial, and not yet completely understood mechanisms, which place the affected patients in a peculiar subgroup among those constituting the heterogeneous CIM population. ETV is confirmed as the best first approach for this subset of patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31227858
doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04245-6
pii: 10.1007/s00381-019-04245-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1701-1709Références
Neurosurgery. 1999 May;44(5):1005-17
pubmed: 10232534
Neurochirurgie. 1999 Sep;45(3):232-6
pubmed: 10567964
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Jan;21(1):151-8
pubmed: 10669242
Neurosurgery. 2000 May;46(5):1100-9; discussion 1109-11
pubmed: 10807242
Neurosurgery. 2000 Jul;47(1):233-5
pubmed: 10917368
J Neurosurg. 2000 Aug;93(2):326-9
pubmed: 10930021
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001 Sep;143(9):909-17; discussion 918
pubmed: 11685623
J Neurosurg. 2001 Nov;95(5):783-90
pubmed: 11702868
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002 Jan;36(1):54
pubmed: 11818750
Neurosurgery. 2002 Aug;51(2):500-3; discussion 503-4
pubmed: 12182791
Childs Nerv Syst. 2002 Nov;18(11):605-8
pubmed: 12420119
Med Hypotheses. 2003 Jun;60(6):859-63
pubmed: 12699714
J Child Neurol. 2003 Jul;18(7):496-8
pubmed: 12940656
Clin Dysmorphol. 2003 Oct;12(4):275
pubmed: 14564218
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1992;18(4):202-6
pubmed: 1472433
Childs Nerv Syst. 2004 May;20(5):341-8
pubmed: 14966661
J Neurosurg. 2004 Apr;100(4):626-33
pubmed: 15070116
Pediatr Neurol. 2004 Apr;30(4):278-80
pubmed: 15087107
J Neurol Sci. 2004 May 15;220(1-2):3-21
pubmed: 15140600
Neurosurg Rev. 2004 Jul;27(3):145-65; discussion 166-7
pubmed: 15164255
Childs Nerv Syst. 2005 Oct;21(10):889-901
pubmed: 15875201
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005 Dec;108(1):87-92
pubmed: 16311156
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2005 Oct;48(5):302-5
pubmed: 16320194
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(1):14-9
pubmed: 16357496
Neurochirurgie. 2006 Feb;52(1):47-51
pubmed: 16609659
J Vet Sci. 2006 Jun;7(2):203-6
pubmed: 16645349
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Aug 15;247(1):71-5
pubmed: 16682058
Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Nov;22(11):1451-6
pubmed: 16733759
Hum Mutat. 2007 Mar;28(3):265-72
pubmed: 17054105
Childs Nerv Syst. 2007 Nov;23(11):1239-50
pubmed: 17639419
J Neurosurg. 2007 Sep;107(3 Suppl):188-92
pubmed: 17918522
Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(4):743-7
pubmed: 17919832
Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2008 Apr 11;5:7
pubmed: 18405364
J Neurosurg. 2008 Jun;108(6):1211-4
pubmed: 18518729
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Dec;24(12):1493-7
pubmed: 18626650
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Sep;2(3):179-87
pubmed: 18759599
Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Apr;25(4):443-52
pubmed: 19066913
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 May;149A(5):1036-40
pubmed: 19396835
Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Jan;26(1):13-8
pubmed: 19763591
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jan;5(1):68-74
pubmed: 20043738
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May;152A(5):1161-8
pubmed: 20425820
Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):950-6
pubmed: 21221038
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Mar;7(3):248-56
pubmed: 21361762
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Sep;31(3):E3
pubmed: 21882908
Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Oct;27(10):1653-64
pubmed: 21928030
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2011;(37):143-211
pubmed: 21997744
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Nov;154(11):2109-13; discussion 2113
pubmed: 22955871
Br J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;28(3):330-4
pubmed: 24066685
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(12):847-52
pubmed: 24140779
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;119:50-3
pubmed: 24635925
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Sep 15;344(1-2):240-2
pubmed: 25015845
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;126:130-6
pubmed: 25240132
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;43(7):1042-8
pubmed: 26051848
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015 Oct;26(4):495-9
pubmed: 26408057
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 May;17(5):525-32
pubmed: 26799408
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Jan;33(1):187-192
pubmed: 27447182
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Nov;41(5):E2
pubmed: 27798986
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jan;41(1):249-254
pubmed: 28326451
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:995.e1-995.e4
pubmed: 28899831
J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;4(1):45-54
pubmed: 29732422
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Aug;38(9):706-712
pubmed: 29927492
World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:55-58
pubmed: 30017764
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Oct;22(4):426-438
pubmed: 30028271
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Nov 1;22(5):508-512
pubmed: 30074451
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;58:165-171
pubmed: 30279122
J Pediatr. 2019 Mar;206:295
pubmed: 30528573
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Apr;35(4):657-664
pubmed: 30536026
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;176:122-126
pubmed: 30557765
Acta Neurol Belg. 2019 Jun;119(2):245-252
pubmed: 30737652
Neurosurgery. 1988 Sep;23(3):360-2
pubmed: 3226514
J Neurosurg. 1987 Oct;67(4):595-9
pubmed: 3309204
Pediatr Neurosci. 1987;13(1):3-8
pubmed: 3317333
J Neurosurg. 1971 Dec;35(6):672-6
pubmed: 5315737
Neurosurgery. 1995 Aug;37(2):214-8
pubmed: 7477771
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(5):251-4
pubmed: 7547457
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1993 Jul;21(5):181-8
pubmed: 8360349
J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan;86(1):40-7
pubmed: 8988080
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1996 Dec;39(4):130-2
pubmed: 9007832
Childs Nerv Syst. 1996 Nov;12(11):727-33
pubmed: 9118138
J Neurosurg. 1998 Feb;88(2):209-14
pubmed: 9452225
Childs Brain. 1976;2(3):167-76
pubmed: 971636