Teens Using Screens for Help: Impact of Suicidal Ideation, Anxiety, and Depression Levels on Youth Preferences for Telemental Health Resources.

adolescent anxiety depression health resources help-seeking behavior mental health mental health services online social networking students suicidal ideation telemedicine

Journal

JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 22 12 2018
accepted: 30 04 2019
revised: 22 03 2019
entrez: 23 6 2019
pubmed: 23 6 2019
medline: 23 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

High rates of mental illness, stress, and suicidality among teens constitute a major public health concern in the United States. However, treatment rates remain low, partially because of barriers that could be mitigated with tech-based telemental health (TMH) resources, separate from or in addition to traditional care. This study aimed to analyze TMH resource usage by high school students to establish current user characteristics and provide a framework for future development. A total of 2789 students were surveyed regarding demographics, recent anxiety and depression symptoms, suicidality, and stress; people with whom they could openly and honestly discuss stress or problems, and prior TMH use. Logistic regression models and a general linear model were used to test relationships between variables. Overall, 30.58% (853/2789) and 22.91% (639/2789) of students reported moderate to severe anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively, in the past 2 weeks; 16.24% (414/2550) had seriously considered suicide in the past year, consistent with national averages. Meanwhile, 16.03% (447/2789) of students had previously used at least 1 of 4 types of TMH resources (ie, self-help, anonymous chat, online counselor, or crisis text line). Teens reporting depression symptoms, higher stress, or suicidality were less likely to talk to a parent about stress or problems and more likely to tell no one. Suicidality was related to the use of all 4 types of TMH resources. Depression symptoms were related to the use of anonymous chat and crisis text line, and those with higher stress were more likely to have used an online counselor. Those reporting anxiety symptoms were less likely to have no one to talk to and more likely to have used a self-help resource. Youth struggling with mental health symptoms, some of whom lack real-life confidants, are using existing TMH support, with resource preferences related to symptoms. Future research should consider these preferences and assist in the creation of specialized, evidence-based TMH resources.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
High rates of mental illness, stress, and suicidality among teens constitute a major public health concern in the United States. However, treatment rates remain low, partially because of barriers that could be mitigated with tech-based telemental health (TMH) resources, separate from or in addition to traditional care.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to analyze TMH resource usage by high school students to establish current user characteristics and provide a framework for future development.
METHODS METHODS
A total of 2789 students were surveyed regarding demographics, recent anxiety and depression symptoms, suicidality, and stress; people with whom they could openly and honestly discuss stress or problems, and prior TMH use. Logistic regression models and a general linear model were used to test relationships between variables.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 30.58% (853/2789) and 22.91% (639/2789) of students reported moderate to severe anxiety and depression symptoms, respectively, in the past 2 weeks; 16.24% (414/2550) had seriously considered suicide in the past year, consistent with national averages. Meanwhile, 16.03% (447/2789) of students had previously used at least 1 of 4 types of TMH resources (ie, self-help, anonymous chat, online counselor, or crisis text line). Teens reporting depression symptoms, higher stress, or suicidality were less likely to talk to a parent about stress or problems and more likely to tell no one. Suicidality was related to the use of all 4 types of TMH resources. Depression symptoms were related to the use of anonymous chat and crisis text line, and those with higher stress were more likely to have used an online counselor. Those reporting anxiety symptoms were less likely to have no one to talk to and more likely to have used a self-help resource.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Youth struggling with mental health symptoms, some of whom lack real-life confidants, are using existing TMH support, with resource preferences related to symptoms. Future research should consider these preferences and assist in the creation of specialized, evidence-based TMH resources.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31228179
pii: v6i6e13230
doi: 10.2196/13230
pmc: PMC6611146
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e13230

Informations de copyright

©Tammy Toscos, Amanda Coupe, Mindy Flanagan, Michelle Drouin, Maria Carpenter, Lauren Reining, Amelia Roebuck, Michael J Mirro. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 21.06.2019.

Références

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999 Jul 15;56(14):1405-26
pubmed: 10428449
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;11(4):290-295
pubmed: 25808317
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):779-804
pubmed: 28930496
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 15;17(5):e123
pubmed: 25979680
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 16;16(9):e206
pubmed: 25226790
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;17(1):1-18
pubmed: 23645343
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;45(9):1023-1031
pubmed: 16840879
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1510-3
pubmed: 22193801
World Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;18(1):97-98
pubmed: 30600619
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 17;66(10):270-273
pubmed: 28301448
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;50(1):32-45
pubmed: 21156268
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1097-103
pubmed: 20368315
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Oct 27;3(4):e48
pubmed: 27789425
J Ment Health. 2015;24(5):313-20
pubmed: 26485198
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016 Aug;30(4):457-62
pubmed: 27455918
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;58(4):474-503
pubmed: 27943285
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 May 19;2(2):e19
pubmed: 26543923
Diabetes Care. 2012 Mar;35(3):498-502
pubmed: 22301127
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):221-9
pubmed: 25997643
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jul 31;6(1):19
pubmed: 30094291
Healthcare (Basel). 2014 May 06;2(2):220-33
pubmed: 27429272
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):462-6
pubmed: 26911820
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 14;9:686
pubmed: 30618866
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):649-54
pubmed: 22508463
J Rural Health. 2019 Mar;35(2):247-252
pubmed: 29940082
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;54(1):37-44.e2
pubmed: 25524788
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21
pubmed: 19996233
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 01;12(4):3741-55
pubmed: 25837350
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Mar 01;3(1):e7
pubmed: 26932350
Indian J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct-Dec;60(4):384-392
pubmed: 30581202
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 25;14(3):e67
pubmed: 22732135
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Aug;25(4):294-302
pubmed: 21784287
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jan 25;6(1):e11334
pubmed: 30681968
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Apr;25(2):113-22
pubmed: 26744309
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):29-34
pubmed: 25326599
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Dec;24(12):998-1005
pubmed: 29658826
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Aug;16(8):593-8
pubmed: 23679567
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2016;30(2):124-42
pubmed: 27333633
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Jun;29(Pt 2):253-69
pubmed: 21199497
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):345-59
pubmed: 20633738
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):477-84
pubmed: 26911822
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):449-55
pubmed: 26661717
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 30;10:113
pubmed: 21192795
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 28;14:124
pubmed: 24774644
J Affect Disord. 2010 Apr;122(1-2):86-95
pubmed: 19616305
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:15-22
pubmed: 28456072
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jun 19;14:84
pubmed: 23782796
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;5(10):845-854
pubmed: 30170964
Internet Interv. 2016 May;4(2):145-151
pubmed: 28090438
JAMIA Open. 2018 Apr 20;1(1):67-74
pubmed: 31984319
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):379-81
pubmed: 20622196
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2018 Jun 15;67(8):1-114
pubmed: 29902162
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;29(4):227-234A
pubmed: 29069107
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Jul;19(7):465-70
pubmed: 27428034
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:28-39
pubmed: 26048165
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):427-429
pubmed: 28412890

Auteurs

Tammy Toscos (T)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Amanda Coupe (A)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Mindy Flanagan (M)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Michelle Drouin (M)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.
Department of Psychology, Purdue University, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Maria Carpenter (M)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Lauren Reining (L)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Amelia Roebuck (A)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Michael J Mirro (MJ)

Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.

Classifications MeSH