The Role of Intentional Strength in Shaping the Sense of Agency.
intentional binding
intentional strength
intentions
rewards
sense of agency
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
29
04
2019
entrez:
25
6
2019
pubmed:
25
6
2019
medline:
25
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Awareness of action is a pervasive personal experience that is crucial in understanding self-generated and other-generated actions as well as their effects. A large body of research suggests that action awareness, as measured by the magnitude of temporal binding between an action and its effect in an operant action task (i.e., intentional binding), is rooted in the human capacity to experience self-agency and establish action intentions. Whereas previous research mainly addressed the role of intentionality itself in these socially well-shared experiences, in the present study we focused specifically on one important aspect of it: the quality or strength of action intentions. We expected and established that stronger intentions increase intentional binding. Specifically, the magnitude of the binding effect, as assessed by the Libet clock task in which two actions were followed by the same neutral tone, was elevated for the action that was enacted with stronger intentions. We briefly discuss the implications of the observed role of intentional strength in temporal binding between action and effect, for promoting a better understanding and examination of how the concept of intentionality is associated with action awareness in general, and the experience of being the agent of one's own actions in particular.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31231265
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01124
pmc: PMC6558416
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1124Références
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 29;355(1404):1771-88
pubmed: 11205340
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Apr 1;5(4):171-178
pubmed: 11287271
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):382-5
pubmed: 11896397
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):237-242
pubmed: 12039604
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Conscious Cogn. 2002 Dec;11(4):481-7
pubmed: 12470618
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):65-69
pubmed: 12584024
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):343-353
pubmed: 14979809
Emotion. 2004 Jun;4(2):189-200
pubmed: 15222855
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:403-50
pubmed: 16022602
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Sep;14(3):439-58
pubmed: 16091264
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:87-115
pubmed: 16318590
Science. 2008 Mar 21;319(5870):1639
pubmed: 18356517
Neuroscientist. 2008 Aug;14(4):319-25
pubmed: 18660462
Brain. 2010 Oct;133(10):3104-12
pubmed: 20685805
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):943-74
pubmed: 20822210
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010 Oct 1;4(10):951-967
pubmed: 21116462
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):532-7
pubmed: 21317370
Emotion. 2012 Feb;12(1):132-41
pubmed: 21707153
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1847-54
pubmed: 21920776
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(1):105-12
pubmed: 21936738
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1865-71
pubmed: 21963403
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Mar;21(1):501-6
pubmed: 22115726
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53421
pubmed: 23285293
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 29;7:514
pubmed: 24009575
Curr Biol. 2013 Oct 21;23(20):2028-32
pubmed: 24094850
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 26;5:657
pubmed: 25018743
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 17;5:1483
pubmed: 25566155
Cortex. 2015 Apr;65:149-58
pubmed: 25706808
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Jun;108(6):850-66
pubmed: 25984787
Curr Biol. 2016 Mar 7;26(5):585-92
pubmed: 26898470
Mindfulness (N Y). 2016;7(6):1416-1422
pubmed: 27909466
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Mar;49:25-34
pubmed: 28107726
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):882-893
pubmed: 28488908
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Oct;55:245-253
pubmed: 28942359
Psychol Rev. 1970 Mar;77(2):73-99
pubmed: 5454129
Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):623-42
pubmed: 6640273
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061