Mouse whole embryo culture: Evaluating the requirement for rat serum as culture medium.


Journal

Birth defects research
ISSN: 2472-1727
Titre abrégé: Birth Defects Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101701004

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2019
Historique:
received: 27 04 2019
revised: 31 05 2019
accepted: 06 06 2019
pubmed: 27 6 2019
medline: 9 7 2020
entrez: 26 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whole embryo culture is a valuable research method in mammalian developmental biology and birth defects research, enabling longitudinal studies of explanted organogenesis-stage rodent embryos. Rat serum is the primary culture medium, and can sustain growth and development over limited periods as in utero. However, the cost, labor, and time to produce culture serum are factors limiting the uptake of the methodology. The goal of replacing or at least reducing rat serum usage in culture would be in accordance with the principles of "replacement, reduction, and refinement" of animals in research (the 3Rs). We performed cultures of mouse embryos for 24 hr from embryonic day 8.5 in serum-free media or in rat serum diluted with defined media, compared with 100% rat serum. Developmental parameters scored after culture included yolk sac circulation, dorsal axial length, somite number, protein content, and completion of cranial neural tube closure. A literature review revealed use of both serum-free and diluted rat serum-based media in whole embryo culture studies, but with almost no formal comparisons of culture success against 100% rat serum. Two serum-free media were tested, but neither could sustain development as in 100% rat serum. Dilution of rat serum 1:1 with Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium plus defined supplements supported growth and development as well as whole rat serum, whereas other diluent media yielded substandard outcomes. Rat serum usage cannot be avoided, to achieve high quality mouse embryo cultures, but rat usage can be reduced using medium containing diluted serum.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Whole embryo culture is a valuable research method in mammalian developmental biology and birth defects research, enabling longitudinal studies of explanted organogenesis-stage rodent embryos. Rat serum is the primary culture medium, and can sustain growth and development over limited periods as in utero. However, the cost, labor, and time to produce culture serum are factors limiting the uptake of the methodology. The goal of replacing or at least reducing rat serum usage in culture would be in accordance with the principles of "replacement, reduction, and refinement" of animals in research (the 3Rs).
METHODS
We performed cultures of mouse embryos for 24 hr from embryonic day 8.5 in serum-free media or in rat serum diluted with defined media, compared with 100% rat serum. Developmental parameters scored after culture included yolk sac circulation, dorsal axial length, somite number, protein content, and completion of cranial neural tube closure.
RESULTS
A literature review revealed use of both serum-free and diluted rat serum-based media in whole embryo culture studies, but with almost no formal comparisons of culture success against 100% rat serum. Two serum-free media were tested, but neither could sustain development as in 100% rat serum. Dilution of rat serum 1:1 with Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium plus defined supplements supported growth and development as well as whole rat serum, whereas other diluent media yielded substandard outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Rat serum usage cannot be avoided, to achieve high quality mouse embryo cultures, but rat usage can be reduced using medium containing diluted serum.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31237114
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1538
pmc: PMC6778057
mid: EMS83735
doi:

Substances chimiques

Culture Media 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1165-1177

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 087525
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
ID : NC/M001555/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. Birth Defects Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1980 Aug;58:1-12
pubmed: 6160192
Methods. 2001 May;24(1):35-42
pubmed: 11327800
Genesis. 2003 Mar;35(3):164-8
pubmed: 12640621
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1967 Jun;17(3):513-25
pubmed: 4860575
J Vis Exp. 2014 Aug 03;(90):e51969
pubmed: 25145996
Dev Biol. 1978 Aug;65(2):396-403
pubmed: 680369
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981 Dec;66:109-16
pubmed: 7338707
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1978 Feb;53(1):81-122
pubmed: 352414
Placenta. 1996 Nov;17(8):635-41
pubmed: 8916213
Cell Struct Funct. 1995 Feb;20(1):1-12
pubmed: 7796462
J Reprod Fertil. 1997 Jan;109(1):153-64
pubmed: 9068427
Teratology. 1986 Feb;33(1):73-84
pubmed: 3738811
Teratology. 1989 Feb;39(2):195-213
pubmed: 2928966
Development. 2013 Jan 1;140(1):226-36
pubmed: 23175632
J Nutr. 1995 Jun;125(6):1587-99
pubmed: 7540202
Differentiation. 2004 Mar;72(2-3):92-102
pubmed: 15066189
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;136:135-60
pubmed: 10840706
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 Dec 25;468(4):813-9
pubmed: 26603939
Reprod Toxicol. 1991;5(5):417-26
pubmed: 1806151
J Exp Zool. 1987 Nov;244(2):319-24
pubmed: 3430125
Teratology. 1969 Aug;2(3):181-5
pubmed: 5823342
Science. 1980 Mar 28;207(4438):1471-3
pubmed: 7361097
Teratology. 1981 Aug;24(1):65-78
pubmed: 7302873
J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Feb;21(1):109-18
pubmed: 5413345
Dev Dyn. 2013 Oct;242(10):1202-9
pubmed: 23873840
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1974 Jun;31(3):707-19
pubmed: 4448946
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1976 Aug;36(1):133-44
pubmed: 988108
Teratology. 1970 May;3(2):153-61
pubmed: 5446881
Mech Dev. 2018 Feb;149:20-26
pubmed: 29225143
Experientia. 1979 Jan 15;35(1):138-40
pubmed: 33822
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1980 Oct;59:131-43
pubmed: 7217867
Genesis. 2003 Sep;37(1):38-43
pubmed: 14502576
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Mar;54(2):198-208
pubmed: 25836967
J Exp Zool. 1988 Mar;245(3):264-9
pubmed: 3385368
J Nutr. 1989 Nov;119(11):1716-25
pubmed: 2600678
Anal Biochem. 1985 Oct;150(1):76-85
pubmed: 3843705
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;839:133-46
pubmed: 22218898
J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979 Jan;49:17-25
pubmed: 448268
J Reprod Fertil. 1966 Dec;12(3):509-24
pubmed: 5928270
J Vis Exp. 2014 Mar 01;(85):
pubmed: 24637443
J Reprod Fertil. 1979 Nov;57(2):505-10
pubmed: 513037
Biol Reprod. 2001 Jan;64(1):1-12
pubmed: 11133652
J Reprod Fertil. 1973 Oct;35(1):135-8
pubmed: 4742154
Birth Defects Res. 2019 Oct 1;111(16):1165-1177
pubmed: 31237114

Auteurs

Lucy H Culshaw (LH)

Newlife Birth Defects Research Centre, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Dawn Savery (D)

Newlife Birth Defects Research Centre, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Nicholas D E Greene (NDE)

Newlife Birth Defects Research Centre, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Andrew J Copp (AJ)

Newlife Birth Defects Research Centre, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH