Lamina cribrosa surface position in idiopathic intracranial hypertension with swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
lamina cribrosa
swept-source optical coherence tomography
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
6
2019
pubmed:
27
6
2019
medline:
5
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to compare the thickness and depth measurements of the lamina cribrosa (LC) obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) device in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients and healthy subjects. This retrospective, cross-sectional observational study included 16 eyes with IIH and 20 control eyes. The LC measurements with serial horizontal B scans of the optic nerve head were obtained using SS-OCT (Topcon 3D DRI OCT Triton). The anterior lamina surface (ALS) depth, posterior lamina surface (PLS) depth, and LC thickness measurements were evaluated. In patients with IIH, the mean ALS depth was 225.00 ± 58.57 μm and the mean PLS depth was 449.75 ± 63.50 μm. In the IIH control group, the corresponding values were 359.40 ± 105.38 and 570.10 ± 99.41 μm (P < 0.05). The difference in LC thickness between the IIH and control subjects was not statistically significant. LC can be evaluated using an SS-OCT device. LC was displaced anteriorly in patients with IIH compared with normal controls. The assessment of LC level with SS-OCT in IIH cases is a valuable and reproducible adjunctive imaging method in terms of diagnosis and follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31238417
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2019_67_7_1085_261014
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1736_18
pmc: PMC6611274
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1085-1088Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):e183-9
pubmed: 21875431
Med Hypotheses. 2012 Dec;79(6):719-24
pubmed: 22981592
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1995-2001
pubmed: 24133368
Br J Ophthalmol. 1947 Sep;31(9):551-65
pubmed: 18170379
Opt Express. 2006 May 15;14(10):4403-11
pubmed: 19516592
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;146(4):496-500
pubmed: 18639219
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):621-8
pubmed: 23972075
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 02;52(3):1206-19
pubmed: 21217108
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 19;27(1):55-61
pubmed: 27198638
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Dec;44(12):5189-95
pubmed: 14638716
Opt Express. 2005 May 2;13(9):3252-8
pubmed: 19495226
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008 May;225(5):441-2
pubmed: 18454392
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec;45(12):4388-99
pubmed: 15557447
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2014 Winter;54(1):73-94
pubmed: 24296373
Neuroophthalmology. 2016 May 27;40(4):165-170
pubmed: 27928402
Opt Express. 2007 May 14;15(10):6121-39
pubmed: 19546917
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1359-66
pubmed: 22464141
Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Mar;115(3):423-6
pubmed: 9076222
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):705-11
pubmed: 20547947