Optical coherence tomography angiography versus fluorescein angiography in diagnosing choroidal neovascularization in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.
Adult
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
/ complications
Choroid
/ blood supply
Choroidal Neovascularization
/ diagnosis
Chronic Disease
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
/ methods
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
/ pathology
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Visual Acuity
Choroidal neovascular membrane
OCT angiography
chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
fluorescein angiography
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
6
2019
pubmed:
27
6
2019
medline:
5
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Diagnosis of choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) is difficult in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CCSC) due to overlapping features of both on conventional dye angiography. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) allows a quick and noninvasive detection of CNVM in these eyes. We compared the fluorescein angiography (FA) features of CNVM with those of OCTA to assess the role of FA in detecting CNVM in CCSC eyes. Patients with CCSC undergoing FA, spectral domain (SD)-OCT, and OCTA were identified (March 2015-June 2015). Four retina specialists individually reviewed FA images (without OCTA and SD-OCT) to determine whether CNVM was present. In parallel, two other retina specialists reviewed all images (FA/SD-OCT/OCTA) for CCSC features and confirmed whether CNVM was present using OCTA as the gold standard. The inter- and intraobserver variability was measured by Kappa (k) coefficient. The FA features of CNVM were compared and correlated with those on OCTA. Of 43 eyes (26 patients, mean age 45.6 ± 8.5 years, all males), a definite CNVM (detected by OCTA) was present in nine (20.9%) eyes. FA alone detected CNVM in 13 (30.2%) eyes [sensitivity 44.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.9-76.9), specificity 73.5% (95% CI: 58.7-88.3), positive and negative predictive values 30.8% and 83.3%, respectively, and accuracy 67.44% (95% CI: 53.4-81.4)]. When compared with OCTA, the FA was unable to characterize CNVM in CCSC (with a very low sensitivity and moderate specificity) as none of the specific dye leakage patterns on FA correlated with CNVM seen on OCTA, limiting its usefulness and accuracy in detecting CNVM in these eyes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31238419
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2019_67_7_1095_260968
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1238_18
pmc: PMC6611283
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1095-1100Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;160(3):581-587.e1
pubmed: 26133250
Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;24(1):20-3
pubmed: 2469527
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Aug;56(9):5229-37
pubmed: 26244299
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1228-38
pubmed: 25795476
Retina. 1996;16(3):203-13
pubmed: 8789858
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 May;159(5):890-903.e3
pubmed: 25709063
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 May;24(3):244-7
pubmed: 23518615
Ophthalmology. 1984 Dec;91(12):1554-72
pubmed: 6084221
Retina. 2018 Mar;38(3):629-638
pubmed: 28267114
Retina. 2012 Oct;32(9):1829-37
pubmed: 22850219
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:134783
pubmed: 26634150
Retina. 2002 Feb;22(1):19-24
pubmed: 11884873
Retina. 2015 Jan;35(1):1-9
pubmed: 25158945
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):899-906
pubmed: 25996386
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Sep;234(9):1161-1168
pubmed: 28514814
Ophthalmology. 1996 Dec;103(12):2070-9; discussion 2079-80
pubmed: 9003341
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 Apr 1;48(4):302-310
pubmed: 28419395
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul;121(7):1435-44
pubmed: 24679442
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571