Conformational transitions of a neurotensin receptor 1-G


Journal

Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 19 02 2019
accepted: 31 05 2019
pubmed: 28 6 2019
medline: 27 11 2019
entrez: 28 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that engages multiple subtypes of G protein, and is involved in the regulation of blood pressure, body temperature, weight and the response to pain. Here we present structures of human NTSR1 in complex with the agonist JMV449 and the heterotrimeric G

Identifiants

pubmed: 31243364
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1337-6
pii: 10.1038/s41586-019-1337-6
pmc: PMC7065593
mid: NIHMS1530687
doi:

Substances chimiques

Oligopeptides 0
Receptors, Neurotensin 0
neurotensin type 1 receptor 0
JMV 449 139026-66-7
GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go EC 3.6.5.1

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

80-85

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM083118
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS028471
Pays : United States

Références

Carraway, R. & Leeman, S. E. The isolation of a new hypotensive peptide, neurotensin, from bovine hypothalami. J. Biol. Chem. 248, 6854–6861 (1973).
pubmed: 4745447
Vincent, J. P., Mazella, J. & Kitabgi, P. Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 20, 302–309 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(99)01357-7
Boules, M., Li, Z., Smith, K., Fredrickson, P. & Richelson, E. Diverse roles of neurotensin agonists in the central nervous system. Front. Endocrinol. 4, 36 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00036
Wu, Z., Martinez-Fong, D., Trédaniel, J. & Forgez, P. Neurotensin and its high affinity receptor 1 as a potential pharmacological target in cancer therapy. Front. Endocrinol. 3, 184 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00184
Mustain, W. C., Rychahou, P. G. & Evers, B. M. The role of neurotensin in physiologic and pathologic processes. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 18, 75–82 (2011).
doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283419052
Schroeder, L. E. & Leinninger, G. M. Role of central neurotensin in regulating feeding: implications for the development and treatment of body weight disorders. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1864, 900–916 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.12.036
Tanaka, K., Masu, M. & Nakanishi, S. Structure and functional expression of the cloned rat neurotensin receptor. Neuron 4, 847–854 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90137-5
Chalon, P. et al. Molecular cloning of a levocabastine-sensitive neurotensin binding site. FEBS Lett. 386, 91–94 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00397-3
Mazella, J. et al. Structure, functional expression, and cerebral localization of the levocabastine-sensitive neurotensin/neuromedin N receptor from mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 16, 5613–5620 (1996).
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-18-05613.1996
Mazella, J. et al. The 100-kDa neurotensin receptor is gp95/sortilin, a non-G-protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26273–26276 (1998).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26273
Kitabgi, P. Targeting neurotensin receptors with agonists and antagonists for therapeutic purposes. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 5, 764–776 (2002).
pubmed: 12630297
Besserer-Offroy, É. et al. The signaling signature of the neurotensin type 1 receptor with endogenous ligands. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 805, 1–13 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.03.046
White, J. F. et al. Structure of the agonist-bound neurotensin receptor. Nature 490, 508–513 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11558
Egloff, P. et al. Structure of signaling-competent neurotensin receptor 1 obtained by directed evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E655–E662 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317903111
Krumm, B. E., White, J. F., Shah, P. & Grisshammer, R. Structural prerequisites for G-protein activation by the neurotensin receptor. Nat. Commun. 6, 7895 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8895
Krumm, B. E. et al. Structure and dynamics of a constitutively active neurotensin receptor. Sci. Rep. 6, 38564 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/srep38564
Ballesteros, J. A. & Weinstein, H. in Receptor Molecular Biology, vol. 25 (ed. Sealfon, S. C.) Ch. 19 (Elsevier, 1995).
Dubuc, I. et al. JMV 449: a pseudopeptide analogue of neurotensin-(8–13) with highly potent and long-lasting hypothermic and analgesic effects in the mouse. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 219, 327–329 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(92)90314-T
Koehl, A. et al. Structure of the μ-opioid receptor–G
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0219-7
Noble, A. J. et al. Reducing effects of particle adsorption to the air–water interface in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 15, 793–795 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0139-3
Rasmussen, S. G. et al. Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β
doi: 10.1038/nature09648
Huang, W. et al. Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 315–321 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nature14886
Rasmussen, S. G. et al. Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor–G
doi: 10.1038/nature10361
Capper, M. J. & Wacker, D. How the ubiquitous GPCR receptor family selectively activates signalling pathways. Nature 558, 529–530 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05503-4
Dror, R. O. et al. Activation mechanism of the β2-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18684–18689 (2011).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110499108
Latorraca, N. R., Venkatakrishnan, A. J. & Dror, R. O. GPCR dynamics: structures in motion. Chem. Rev. 117, 139–155 (2017).
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177
Draper-Joyce, C. J. et al. Structure of the adenosine-bound human adenosine A
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0236-6
García-Nafría, J., Nehmé, R., Edwards, P. C. & Tate, C. G. Cryo-EM structure of the serotonin 5-HT
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0241-9
Wall, M. A. et al. The structure of the G protein heterotrimer G
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90220-1
Sun, D. et al. Probing Gα
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3070
Thomas, T. C., Schmidt, C. J. & Neer, E. J. G-protein alpha o subunit: mutation of conserved cysteines identifies a subunit contact surface and alters GDP affinity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10295–10299 (1993).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10295
Iiri, T., Herzmark, P., Nakamoto, J. M., van Dop, C. & Bourne, H. R. Rapid GDP release from G
doi: 10.1038/371164a0
Posner, B. A., Mixon, M. B., Wall, M. A., Sprang, S. R. & Gilman, A. G. The A326S mutant of G
doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.34.21752
Grishina, G. & Berlot, C. H. A surface-exposed region of G
pubmed: 10825378
Hu, J. et al. Structural basis of G protein-coupled receptor–G protein interactions. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 541–548 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nchembio.385
Hillenbrand, M., Schori, C., Schöppe, J. & Plückthun, A. Comprehensive analysis of heterotrimeric G-protein complex diversity and their interactions with GPCRs in solution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1181–E1190 (2015).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417573112
Inoue, A. et al. Illuminating G-protein-coupling selectivity of GPCRs. Cell 177, 1933–1947 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.044
Sounier, R. et al. Propagation of conformational changes during μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 375–378 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nature14680
Gregorio, G. G. et al. Single-molecule analysis of ligand efficacy in β
doi: 10.1038/nature22354
Van Eps, N. et al. G
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721896115
Dror, R. O. et al. Structural basis for nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins. Science 348, 1361–1365 (2015).
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5264
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003
Scheres, S. H. Processing of structurally heterogeneous cryo-EM data in RELION. Methods Enzymol. 579, 125–157 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.012
Heymann, J. B. Single particle reconstruction and validation using Bsoft for the map challenge. J. Struct. Biol. 204, 90–95 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.07.003
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/pro.3330
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/pro.3235
Jacobson, M. P. et al. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins 55, 351–367 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/prot.10613
Jacobson, M. P., Friesner, R. A., Xiang, Z. & Honig, B. On the role of the crystal environment in determining protein side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 320, 597–608 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00470-9
Eswar, N. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 50, 2.9.1–2.9.31 (2007).
doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0209s50
Ghanouni, P. et al. The effect of pH on β
doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3121
Ranganathan, A., Dror, R. O. & Carlsson, J. Insights into the role of Asp79
doi: 10.1021/bi5008723
Lomize, M. A., Lomize, A. L., Pogozheva, I. D. & Mosberg, H. I. OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database. Bioinformatics 22, 623–625 (2006).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk023
Betz, R.M. Dabble. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.836914 (2018).
Vilardaga, J. P., Bünemann, M., Krasel, C., Castro, M. & Lohse, M. J. Measurement of the millisecond activation switch of G protein-coupled receptors in living cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 807–812 (2003).
doi: 10.1038/nbt838
Lewis, G. N. A new principle of equilibrium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11, 179–183 (1925).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.11.3.179
Astumian, R. D. Microscopic reversibility as the organizing principle of molecular machines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 684–688 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.188
Hopkins, C. W., Le Grand, S., Walker, R. C. & Roitberg, A. E. Long-time-step molecular dynamics through hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 1864–1874 (2015).
doi: 10.1021/ct5010406
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
Huang, J. & MacKerell, A. D., Jr. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: validation based on comparison to NMR data. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2135–2145 (2013).
doi: 10.1002/jcc.23354
Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010).
doi: 10.1021/jp101759q
MacKerell, A. D. et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586–3616 (1998).
doi: 10.1021/jp973084f
Best, R. B., Mittal, J., Feig, M. & MacKerell, A. D. Jr. Inclusion of many-body effects in the additive CHARMM protein CMAP potential results in enhanced cooperativity of α-helix and β-hairpin formation. Biophys. J. 103, 1045–1051 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.042
Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ
doi: 10.1021/ct300400x
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Götz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S. & Walker, R. C. Routine microsecond molecular dynamics simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit solvent particle mesh ewald. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3878–3888 (2013).
doi: 10.1021/ct400314y
Pearlman, D. A. et al. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 1–41 (1995).
doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00041-D
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Coleman, D. E. & Sprang, S. R. Structure of G
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.16669
Grundmann, M. et al. Lack of beta-arrestin signaling in the absence of active G proteins. Nat. Commun. 9, 341 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02661-3
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014)
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316
Hattori, M., Hibbs, R. E. & Gouaux, E. A fluorescence-detection size-exclusion chromatography-based thermostability assay for membrane protein precrystallization screening. Structure 20, 1293–1299 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.06.009

Auteurs

Hideaki E Kato (HE)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Komaba Institute for Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Yan Zhang (Y)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Pathology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Department of Biophysics, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Hongli Hu (H)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Carl-Mikael Suomivuori (CM)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Francois Marie Ngako Kadji (FMN)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Junken Aoki (J)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Kaavya Krishna Kumar (K)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Rasmus Fonseca (R)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Daniel Hilger (D)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Weijiao Huang (W)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Naomi R Latorraca (NR)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Asuka Inoue (A)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Ron O Dror (RO)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Brian K Kobilka (BK)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. kobilka@stanford.edu.

Georgios Skiniotis (G)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. yiorgo@stanford.edu.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. yiorgo@stanford.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH