Visibility of Community Nursing Within an Administrative Health Classification System: Evaluation of Content Coverage.
World Health Organization
classification
community health services
data collection
medical informatics
nursing informatics
standardized nursing terminology
terminology
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 06 2019
26 06 2019
Historique:
received:
16
11
2018
accepted:
02
05
2019
revised:
11
04
2019
entrez:
28
6
2019
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization is in the process of developing an international administrative classification for health called the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI). The purpose of ICHI is to provide a tool for supporting intervention reporting and analysis at a global level for policy development and beyond. Nurses represent the largest resource carrying out clinical interventions in any health system. With the shift in nursing care from hospital to community settings in many countries, it is important to ensure that community nursing interventions are present in any international health information system. Thus, an investigation into the extent to which community nursing interventions were covered in ICHI was needed. The objectives of this study were to examine the extent to which International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) community nursing interventions were represented in the ICHI administrative classification system, to identify themes related to gaps in coverage, and to support continued advancements in understanding the complexities of knowledge representation in standardized clinical terminologies and classifications. This descriptive study used a content mapping approach in 2 phases in 2018. A total of 187 nursing intervention codes were extracted from the ICNP Community Nursing Catalogue and mapped to ICHI. In phase 1, 2 coders completed independent mapping activities. In phase 2, the 2 coders compared each list and discussed concept matches until consensus on ICNP-ICHI match and on mapping relationship was reached. The initial percentage agreement between the 2 coders was 47% (n=88), but reached 100% with consensus processes. After consensus was reached, 151 (81%) of the community nursing interventions resulted in an ICHI match. A total of 36 (19%) of community nursing interventions had no match to ICHI content. A total of 100 (53%) community nursing interventions resulted in a broader ICHI code, 9 (5%) resulted in a narrower ICHI code, and 42 (23%) were considered equivalent. ICNP concepts that were not represented in ICHI were thematically grouped into the categories family and caregivers, death and dying, and case management. Overall, the content mapping yielded similar results to other content mapping studies in nursing. However, it also found areas of missing concept coverage, difficulties with interterminology mapping, and further need to develop mapping methods.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization is in the process of developing an international administrative classification for health called the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI). The purpose of ICHI is to provide a tool for supporting intervention reporting and analysis at a global level for policy development and beyond. Nurses represent the largest resource carrying out clinical interventions in any health system. With the shift in nursing care from hospital to community settings in many countries, it is important to ensure that community nursing interventions are present in any international health information system. Thus, an investigation into the extent to which community nursing interventions were covered in ICHI was needed.
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this study were to examine the extent to which International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) community nursing interventions were represented in the ICHI administrative classification system, to identify themes related to gaps in coverage, and to support continued advancements in understanding the complexities of knowledge representation in standardized clinical terminologies and classifications.
METHODS
This descriptive study used a content mapping approach in 2 phases in 2018. A total of 187 nursing intervention codes were extracted from the ICNP Community Nursing Catalogue and mapped to ICHI. In phase 1, 2 coders completed independent mapping activities. In phase 2, the 2 coders compared each list and discussed concept matches until consensus on ICNP-ICHI match and on mapping relationship was reached.
RESULTS
The initial percentage agreement between the 2 coders was 47% (n=88), but reached 100% with consensus processes. After consensus was reached, 151 (81%) of the community nursing interventions resulted in an ICHI match. A total of 36 (19%) of community nursing interventions had no match to ICHI content. A total of 100 (53%) community nursing interventions resulted in a broader ICHI code, 9 (5%) resulted in a narrower ICHI code, and 42 (23%) were considered equivalent. ICNP concepts that were not represented in ICHI were thematically grouped into the categories family and caregivers, death and dying, and case management.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the content mapping yielded similar results to other content mapping studies in nursing. However, it also found areas of missing concept coverage, difficulties with interterminology mapping, and further need to develop mapping methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31244480
pii: v21i6e12847
doi: 10.2196/12847
pmc: PMC6617914
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e12847Informations de copyright
©Lorraine J Block, Leanne M Currie, Nicholas R Hardiker, Gillian Strudwick. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 26.06.2019.
Références
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 May;22(3):545-52
pubmed: 25670750
Rev Bras Enferm. 2011 Mar-Apr;64(2):248-53
pubmed: 21755206
Gerontologist. 2013 Jun;53(3):407-17
pubmed: 22563000
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1974;(558):1-28
pubmed: 4216177
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):536-46
pubmed: 16799121
Br J Community Nurs. 2017 Aug 2;22(8):398-406
pubmed: 28767308
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 May;52(5):988-1002
pubmed: 25661314
Public Health Nurs. 1994 Oct;11(5):315-23
pubmed: 7971696
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jun;25(11-12):1683-92
pubmed: 26898819
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Nov;37(4-5):394-403
pubmed: 9865037
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jun;96(6):533-40
pubmed: 21429975
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:857-62
pubmed: 18487839
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jul 01;24(4):722-728
pubmed: 28339684
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2006 Oct-Dec;17(4):153-64
pubmed: 17117945
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 17;15(1):
pubmed: 29342077
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Apr;80:1-13
pubmed: 29462669
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:895-899
pubmed: 29678090
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:749-53
pubmed: 21893847
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Oct;76 Suppl 2:S274-80
pubmed: 17600764
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Feb;52(1):119-35
pubmed: 27264878
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 24;3(4):
pubmed: 23619089
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;236:40-47
pubmed: 28508777
J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;14(4):271-8
pubmed: 17345756
Image J Nurs Sch. 1996 Summer;28(2):137-41
pubmed: 8690430
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Jun;49:213-20
pubmed: 24632297
Int Nurs Rev. 2002 Jun;49(2):99-110
pubmed: 12094837
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:9-12
pubmed: 29132637