Classification of Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Profiles via Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.
connectome
diffusion tensor imaging
graph neural networks
graph-derived metrics
multiple sclerosis
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
18
02
2019
accepted:
24
05
2019
entrez:
28
6
2019
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
28
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent advances in image acquisition and processing techniques, along with the success of novel deep learning architectures, have given the opportunity to develop innovative algorithms capable to provide a better characterization of neurological related diseases. In this work, we introduce a neural network based approach to classify Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients into four clinical profiles. Starting from their structural connectivity information, obtained by diffusion tensor imaging and represented as a graph, we evaluate the classification performances using unweighted and weighted connectivity matrices. Furthermore, we investigate the role of graph-based features for a better characterization and classification of the pathology. Ninety MS patients (12 clinically isolated syndrome, 30 relapsing-remitting, 28 secondary-progressive, and 20 primary-progressive) along with 24 healthy controls, were considered in this study. This work shows the great performances achieved by neural networks methods in the classification of the clinical profiles. Furthermore, it shows local graph metrics do not improve the classification results suggesting that the latent features created by the neural network in its layers have a much important informative content. Finally, we observe that graph weights representation of brain connections preserve important information to discriminate between clinical forms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31244599
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00594
pmc: PMC6581753
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
594Références
Ann Neurol. 2018 Feb;83(2):223-234
pubmed: 29328531
Neurology. 2011 Mar 29;76(13):1161-7
pubmed: 21444901
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;90(2):219-226
pubmed: 30467210
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jan;14(1):11-22
pubmed: 14654453
Front Neurosci. 2018 Nov 08;12:818
pubmed: 30467462
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 24;19:633-639
pubmed: 29984171
Curr Opin Neurol. 2002 Jun;15(3):239-45
pubmed: 12045719
Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):606-16
pubmed: 16415308
Lancet Neurol. 2005 May;4(5):281-8
pubmed: 15847841
Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:671730
pubmed: 23606965
Neurology. 2015 Jan 6;84(1):81-8
pubmed: 25398229
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
Neurology. 2014 Jul 15;83(3):278-86
pubmed: 24871874
Front Neurosci. 2016 Oct 25;10:478
pubmed: 27826224
IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2009 Jan;20(1):61-80
pubmed: 19068426
Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7
pubmed: 11456302
Brain. 2010 Jul;133(Pt 7):1914-29
pubmed: 20534650
Brain. 2018 Jun 1;141(6):1665-1677
pubmed: 29741648
Neuroimage Clin. 2018;20:724-730
pubmed: 30238916
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32525
pubmed: 22479330
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
Nat Rev Neurol. 2009 Dec;5(12):672-82
pubmed: 19953117
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017 Apr;39(4):677-691
pubmed: 27608449
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Nov;33(10):1918-24
pubmed: 22790248
Neuroimage. 2017 Jul 15;155:159-168
pubmed: 28435096
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013 Sep;6(5):298-310
pubmed: 23997815
Brain. 2003 Apr;126(Pt 4):770-82
pubmed: 12615637
Lancet Neurol. 2005 Jun;4(6):341-8
pubmed: 15907738