Workplace homicides committed by firearm: recent trends and narrative text analysis.

Descriptive epidemiology Firearm violence Workplace homicide Workplace violence

Journal

Injury epidemiology
ISSN: 2197-1714
Titre abrégé: Inj Epidemiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101652639

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 18 12 2018
accepted: 04 02 2019
entrez: 28 6 2019
pubmed: 28 6 2019
medline: 28 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Firearm workplace homicides are a significant problem in the United States. We sought to provide a current, national-level examination of these crimes and examine how perpetrators accessed firearms used in workplace homicides. We abstracted information on all firearm workplace homicides from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries from 2011 to 2015. We classified deaths by perpetrator's relationship to the workplace/victim, motive (robbery v. non-robbery), circumstance (argument v. other circumstances), and firearm access points using narrative text fields. There were 1553 firearm workplace homicides during the study period. Robbery crime trended downward from 2011 to 2015. In contrast, non-robbery crimes constituted almost 50% of the homicides and trended upward in recent years. Customers and co-workers were the most frequent perpetrators of non-robbery crimes, most after an argument. While customers and co-workers who commit these crimes were often armed at the time of the argument, some were not and retrieved a firearm from an unspecified location before committing a homicide. Thus, immediate Limiting firearm access in the workplace is a possible measure for preventing deadly workplace violence and should be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy for addressing this reemerging public health concern.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Firearm workplace homicides are a significant problem in the United States. We sought to provide a current, national-level examination of these crimes and examine how perpetrators accessed firearms used in workplace homicides.
METHODS METHODS
We abstracted information on all firearm workplace homicides from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries from 2011 to 2015. We classified deaths by perpetrator's relationship to the workplace/victim, motive (robbery v. non-robbery), circumstance (argument v. other circumstances), and firearm access points using narrative text fields.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 1553 firearm workplace homicides during the study period. Robbery crime trended downward from 2011 to 2015. In contrast, non-robbery crimes constituted almost 50% of the homicides and trended upward in recent years. Customers and co-workers were the most frequent perpetrators of non-robbery crimes, most after an argument. While customers and co-workers who commit these crimes were often armed at the time of the argument, some were not and retrieved a firearm from an unspecified location before committing a homicide. Thus, immediate
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Limiting firearm access in the workplace is a possible measure for preventing deadly workplace violence and should be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy for addressing this reemerging public health concern.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31245254
doi: 10.1186/s40621-019-0184-0
pii: 184
pmc: PMC6582660
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

5

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Am J Ind Med. 2000 Jun;37(6):629-36
pubmed: 10797506
JAMA. 2002 Feb 27;287(8):1011-7
pubmed: 11866649
Am J Public Health. 2005 May;95(5):830-2
pubmed: 15855460
Am J Ind Med. 2007 Apr;50(4):316-25
pubmed: 17370317
J Safety Res. 2008;39(1):9-18
pubmed: 18325411
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):17-23
pubmed: 19423270
Ann Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):277-84
pubmed: 22463843
J Occup Environ Med. 2012 Dec;54(12):1533-8
pubmed: 23138043
Am J Ind Med. 2014 Feb;57(2):245-53
pubmed: 24248892
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2016 Sep 1;54(9):31-6
pubmed: 27576226
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 16;166(10):749-750
pubmed: 28462426
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1930-1936
pubmed: 29048957
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(12):1923-1929
pubmed: 29048964
Nurse Pract. 1996 Oct;21(10):95, 98, 101-2, passim
pubmed: 8895195
Occup Med. 1996 Apr-Jun;11(2):293-301
pubmed: 8936258
J Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jan;39(1):44-50
pubmed: 9029430

Auteurs

Mitchell L Doucette (ML)

1Injury Prevention Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut USA.
2Department of Health Sciences, Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT USA.

Maria T Bulzacchelli (MT)

Undergraduate Program in Public Health Studies, Johns Hopkins Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Baltimore, MD USA.

Shannon Frattaroli (S)

4Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.

Cassandra K Crifasi (CK)

4Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.

Classifications MeSH