Analysis of completeness of reporting utilizing the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare Statement in gastroenterology clinical practice guidelines.


Journal

International journal of evidence-based healthcare
ISSN: 1744-1609
Titre abrégé: Int J Evid Based Healthc
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101247063

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 28 6 2019
medline: 14 4 2020
entrez: 28 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Assessing reporting quality is important as it allows distinctions to be made between poor methodology and poor reporting practices. The Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) Statement checklist was published in 2017 to improve the thoroughness and reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). CPGs are evidence-based recommendations developed to assist clinician decision-making in the diagnosis and management of patients. The aim of this study is to assess the completeness of reporting in CPGs listed by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and their frequency of reporting items listed in the RIGHT Statement. Using the 22 criteria (35 items) of the RIGHT Statement checklist, two researchers independently documented the adherence to each item for all eligible guidelines listed by the ACG. This study was conducted from 01/10/18 to 05/12/18. Data were recorded onto a prespecified Google data abstraction form and extracted into MS Excel for statistical analysis. Out of 38 eligible guidelines, nine of the 35 RIGHT (25.7%) checklist items were met with less than 50% adherence. The mean adherence was 26.8 (SD ± 9.5); median adherence was 30 (interquartile range 21.5-33.5). The publication dates ranged from 2007 to 2017 with seven of the guidelines (18.4%) published between 2007 and 2009, 11 (29%) published between 2010 and 2013, and 20 (52.6%) published between 2014 and 2017. The completeness of reporting in CPGs listed by the ACG remains inadequate in several key areas. Poor adherence to items of the RIGHT Statement checklist demonstrates that there is area for improvement in reporting quality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31246697
doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000174
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

173-178

Auteurs

Benjamin Howard (B)

Department of Institutional Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Chris Chapman (C)

Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

Chase Meyer (C)

Department of Institutional Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Corbin Walters (C)

Department of Institutional Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Matt Vassar (M)

Department of Institutional Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH