The Importance of Reproducibility in Plastic Surgery Research.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
entrez:
28
6
2019
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
29
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the advent of big data and database-driven research, the need for reproducible methods has become especially relevant. Given the rise of evidence-based practice, it is crucial to ensure that findings making use of big data can be consistently replicated by other physician-scientists. A call for transparency and reproducibility must occur at the individual, institutional, and national levels. Given the rising popularity of national and large databases in research, the responsibility of authors to ensure reproducibility of clinical research merits renewed discussion. In this article, the authors offer strategies to increase clinical research reproducibility at both the individual and institutional levels, within the context of plastic surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31246840
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005784
pii: 00006534-201907000-00052
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
242-248Références
Zhu VZ, Tuggle CT, Au AF. Promise and limitations of big data research in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:453–458.
Tan SS, Gao G, Koch S. Big data and analytics in healthcare. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54:546–547.
Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, et al. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/McKinsey%20Digital/Our%20Insights/Big%20data%20The%20next%20frontier%20for%20innovation/MGI_big_data_exec_summary.ashx. Accessed April 24, 2018.
National Institutes of Health. PubMed search. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=NSQIP%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%28%22surgery%2C%20plastic%22%5BMeSH%20Terms%5D%20OR%20%28%22surgery%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%22plastic%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%20OR%20%22plastic%20surgery%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20OR%20%28%22plastic%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%20AND%20%22surgery%22%5BAll%20Fields%5D%29%29&cmd=DetailsSearch. Accessed May 1, 2018.
Raj AT, Patil S, Sarode S, Salameh Z. P-hacking: A wake-up call for the scientific community. Sci Eng Ethics 2018;24:1813–1814.
Gorman DM, Elkins AD, Lawley M. A systems approach to understanding and improving research integrity. Sci Eng Ethics2019;25:211–229.
Stodden V, Bailey DH, Borwein J, et al. Setting the default to reproducible: Reproducibility in computational and experimental mathematics. February 16, 2013. Available at: http://stodden.net/icerm_report.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2018.
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 2016;533:452–454.
Baker M. Over half of psychology studies fail reproducibility test. Available at: https://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248. Accessed April 24, 2018.
Begley CG, Ellis LM. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012;483:531–534.
Martinez C, Hollister J, Marwick B, et al. Reproducibility in science: A guide to enhancing reproducibility in scientific results and writing. Available at: http://ropensci.github.io/reproducibility-guide/sections/introduction/. Accessed April 28, 2018.
Huang Y, Gottardo R. Comparability and reproducibility of biomedical data. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:391–401.
Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature 2014;505:612–613.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Instructions for authors. Available at: http://edmgr.ovid.com/prs/accounts/ifauth.htm. Accessed May 31, 2018.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal. Instructions to authors. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/asj/pages/General_Instructions. Accessed May 31, 2018.
JAMA Network. Instructions for authors. Available at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamafacialplasticsurgery/pages/instructions-for-authors-SecChecklist. Accessed May 31, 2018.
Wiley Online Network. Author guidelines. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/10982752/homepage/ForAuthors.html. Accessed May 31, 2018.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Instructions for authors. Available at: https://www.springer.com/medicine/surgery/journal/266. Accessed May 31, 2018.
Announcement: Reducing our irreproducibility. Nature 2013;496:398.
Santori G. Research papers: Journals should drive data reproducibility. Nature 2016;535:355.
Barnes N. Publish your computer code: It is good enough. Nature 2010;467:753.
Ebert P, Müller F, Nordström K, Lengauer T, Schulz MH. A general concept for consistent documentation of computational analyses. Database (Oxford) 2015;2015:bav050.
Begley CG, Buchan AM, Dirnagl U. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Nature 2015;525:25–27.
Mobley A, Linder SK, Braeuer R, Ellis LM, Zwelling L. A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic. PLoS One 2013;8:e63221.
Freshwater MF. Plastic surgery spin: Suppressing clarity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:292–294.
Sarewitz D. The pressure to publish pushes down quality. Nature 2016;533:147.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16569–16572.
Therattil PJ, Hoppe IC, Granick MS, Lee ES. Application of the h-index in academic plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:545–549.
The Plastic Surgery Foundation. Research: Grants program. Available at: https://www.thepsf.org/research/grants-program. Accessed June 2, 2018.
Stodden V. Enabling Reproducible Research: Open Licensing for Scientific Innovation. 2009.Urbana-Champaign, Ill: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
Beaulieu-Jones BK, Wu ZS, Williams C, et al. Privacy-preserving generative deep neural networks support clinical data sharing. bioRxiv. Available at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/07/05/159756.full.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2018.
Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016;3:160018.
International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. ICHOM advances value-based health care with first-ever global health outcomes benchmarking program. March 10, 2016. Available at: http://www.ichom.org/news/ichom-advances-value-based-health-care-with-first-ever-global-health-outcomes-benchmarking-program/. Accessed August 28, 2018.
Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, et al. Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines. May 19, 2018. Available at: https://osf.io/xd6gr/?_ga=2.151606778.2133750148.1535124885-1694443555.1535124885. Accessed August 28, 2018.
Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, et al. Scientific standards: Promoting an open research culture. Science2015;348:1422–1425.
Ascha M, Ascha MS, Gastman B. Identification of risk factors in lymphatic surgeries for melanoma: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program review. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;79:509–515.
Ascha MS, Ascha ML. mustafaascha/nsqipr: Plastic surgery and the July effect in ACS-NSQIP. Zenodo. March 29, 2018. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1209964. Accessed July 1, 2018.
Center for Open Science. Preregistration makes your science better. Available at: https://cos.io/prereg/. Accessed May 8, 2018.
Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124.
Kidwell MC, Lazarević LB, Baranski E, et al. Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002456.
Rohrich RJ, Cho MJ. Evidence-based medicine in aesthetic surgery: The significance of level to aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:1195e–1202e.
Clapham PJ, Chung KC. A systematic review of the relationship between plastic surgery and the medical industry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1098–1105.
Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:619–625.
Sullivan D, Chung KC, Eaves FF III, Rohrich RJ. The level of evidence pyramid: Indicating levels of evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery articles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:311–314.